Literature DB >> 25621378

The effect of horizontal eye movements on free recall: a preregistered adversarial collaboration.

Dora Matzke1, Sander Nieuwenhuis2, Hedderik van Rijn3, Heleen A Slagter4, Maurits W van der Molen1, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers1.   

Abstract

A growing body of research has suggested that horizontal saccadic eye movements facilitate the retrieval of episodic memories in free recall and recognition memory tasks. Nevertheless, a minority of studies have failed to replicate this effect. This article attempts to resolve the inconsistent results by introducing a novel variant of proponent-skeptic collaboration. The proposed approach combines the features of adversarial collaboration and purely confirmatory preregistered research. Prior to data collection, the adversaries reached consensus on an optimal research design, formulated their expectations, and agreed to submit the findings to an academic journal regardless of the outcome. To increase transparency and secure the purely confirmatory nature of the investigation, the 2 parties set up a publicly available adversarial collaboration agreement that detailed the proposed design and all foreseeable aspects of the data analysis. As anticipated by the skeptics, a series of Bayesian hypothesis tests indicated that horizontal eye movements did not improve free recall performance. The skeptics suggested that the nonreplication may partly reflect the use of suboptimal and questionable research practices in earlier eye movement studies. The proponents countered this suggestion and used a p curve analysis to argue that the effect of horizontal eye movements on explicit memory did not merely reflect selective reporting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25621378     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  15 in total

1.  How scientists fool themselves - and how they can stop.

Authors:  Regina Nuzzo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The best time to argue about what a replication means? Before you do it.

Authors:  Brian A Nosek; Timothy M Errington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Multisensory temporal processing in own-body contexts: plausibility of hand ownership does not improve visuo-tactile asynchrony detection.

Authors:  Robert T Keys; Anina N Rich; Regine Zopf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes From an Extended Adversarial Collaboration.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Clément Belletier; Jason M Doherty; Agnieszka J Jaroslawska; Stephen Rhodes; Alicia Forsberg; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Pierre Barrouillet; Valérie Camos; Robert H Logie
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06-08

5.  Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation.

Authors:  Nicholas T Van Dam; Marieke K van Vugt; David R Vago; Laura Schmalzl; Clifford D Saron; Andrew Olendzki; Ted Meissner; Sara W Lazar; Catherine E Kerr; Jolie Gorchov; Kieran C R Fox; Brent A Field; Willoughby B Britton; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; David E Meyer
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-10-10

Review 6.  The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.

Authors:  Johnny van Doorn; Don van den Bergh; Udo Böhm; Fabian Dablander; Koen Derks; Tim Draws; Alexander Etz; Nathan J Evans; Quentin F Gronau; Julia M Haaf; Max Hinne; Šimon Kucharský; Alexander Ly; Maarten Marsman; Dora Matzke; Akash R Komarlu Narendra Gupta; Alexandra Sarafoglou; Angelika Stefan; Jan G Voelkel; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06

7.  Optional stopping: no problem for Bayesians.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

8.  A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.

Authors:  Alexander Etz; Joachim Vandekerckhove
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Replication Requires Psychological Rather than Statistical Hypotheses: The Case of Eye Movements Enhancing Word Recollection.

Authors:  R Hans Phaf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-26

10.  Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming.

Authors:  Michiel van Elk; Dora Matzke; Quentin F Gronau; Maime Guan; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.