| Literature DB >> 25620873 |
Midori Tanaka1, Motoaki Sugawara1, Yasuo Ogasawara2, Isao Suminoe3, Tadafumi Izumi4, Kiyomi Niki5, Fumihiko Kajiya2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Echocardiography; Exercise; Force−frequency relation; Wave intensity
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25620873 PMCID: PMC4300423 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-014-0554-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ultrason (2001) ISSN: 1346-4523 Impact factor: 1.314
Fig. 1Relation between W1 obtained by carotid arterial echography and max dP/dt obtained with a catheter-tipped micromanometer (From Ohte N et al. [9])
Fig. 2Representative recordings of carotid arterial diameter (D) and blood flow velocity (U), and calculated wave intensity (WD) in a healthy human. WD is the wave intensity defined by using D as WD = (1/D) (dD/dt) (dU/dt)
Fig. 3Measurements of diameter-change waveform and blood velocity. Left Long axis view of the common carotid artery and ultrasound beams. By setting the tracking positions displayed as small pink bars on the echo tracking beam (line A) to arterial walls, echo tracking automatically starts. The blood flow velocity averaged along the Doppler beam (line B) crossing the artery was measured using range-gated color Doppler signals. Right The diameter-change waveform, which is calculated by subtracting the distance to the near wall from that to the far wall, is displayed on the M-mode view. The blood flow velocity waveform is also displayed on the M-mode view
Baseline data of all the subjects
| Subject | Age (years) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | BMI (kg/m2) | HR at rest (bpm) | WD1 at rest (m/s3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | 23 | 171 | 64 | 21.9 | 65 | 27.77 |
| b | 23 | 171 | 64 | 21.9 | 74 | 32.19 |
| c | 21 | 175 | 62 | 20.2 | 61 | 10.17 |
| d | 21 | 163 | 55 | 20.7 | 84 | 22.94 |
| e | 21 | 170 | 60 | 20.8 | 74 | 19.00 |
| f | 20 | 172 | 65 | 22.0 | 65 | 20.71 |
| g | 21 | 173 | 54 | 18.0 | 82 | 8.95 |
| h | 19 | 175 | 63 | 20.6 | 78 | 18.00 |
| i | 21 | 171 | 87 | 29.8 | 73 | 22.40 |
| j | 22 | 172 | 66 | 22.3 | 74 | 23.00 |
| k | 19 | 177 | 71 | 22.7 | 61 | 9.10 |
| l | 19 | 160 | 56 | 21.9 | 88 | 50.00 |
| m | 19 | 180 | 69 | 21.3 | 62 | 19.00 |
| n | 21 | 173 | 70 | 23.4 | 62 | 22.40 |
| o | 22 | 170 | 60 | 20.8 | 79 | 17.40 |
| p | 21 | 168 | 63 | 22.3 | 76 | 17.10 |
| q | 21 | 159 | 55 | 21.8 | 104 | 23.60 |
| r | 22 | 168 | 85 | 30.1 | 74 | 25.50 |
| s | 21 | 173 | 53 | 17.7 | 74 | 36.50 |
| t | 19 | 160 | 52 | 20.3 | 66 | 33.74 |
| u | 22 | 176 | 90 | 29.1 | 84 | 13.66 |
| v | 22 | 174 | 78 | 25.8 | 71 | 34.98 |
| w | 19 | 177 | 60 | 19.2 | 71 | 44.51 |
| x | 21 | 165 | 50 | 18.4 | 73 | 42.02 |
| y | 21 | 172 | 54 | 18.3 | 86 | 27.29 |
| Mean | 20.8 | 170.6 | 64.2 | 22.0 | 74.3 | 24.9 |
| SD | 1.2 | 5.4 | 10.8 | 3.3 | 9.9 | 10.6 |
Fig. 4A representative relation between heart rate (HR) (bpm) and work load (W) in healthy male subjects. The solid line indicates the linear regression line, and the dotted curves show the 95 % confidence band of the regression line
Fig. 5Relations between the maximum values of WD (WD1) and heart rate (HR) (bpm). As representative data, WD1-HR relation with the greatest slope, that with the smallest slope, and those with moderate slopes are shown. The solid lines indicate the regression lines. The dotted curves show the 95 % confidence bands of the regression lines