Phyllis Holditch Niolon1, Alana M Vivolo-Kantor2, Natasha E Latzman2, Linda Anne Valle2, Henrietta Kuoh2, Tessa Burton2, Bruce G Taylor3, Andra T Tharp2. 1. Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: PNiolon@cdc.gov. 2. Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study describes the lifetime prevalence of teen dating violence (TDV) perpetration in a sample of middle school students from high-risk urban communities and examines the relation between TDV and related cognitive and behavioral risk factors. METHODS: Surveys were administered to 2,895 middle school students in four U.S. cities; 1,673 students (58%) reported having dated and were included in analyses. The sample was 52.3% female, 48.2% non-Hispanic black/African-American, 38.2% Hispanic, 4.8% non-Hispanic white, and 7.6% other race. Six types of TDV perpetration were assessed: threatening behaviors, verbal/emotional abuse, relational abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and stalking. RESULTS: Of the students who had dated, 77% reported perpetrating verbal/emotional abuse, 32% reported perpetrating physical abuse, 20% reported threatening a partner, 15% reported perpetrating sexual abuse, 13% reported perpetrating relational abuse, and 6% reported stalking. Girls were more likely than boys to report perpetrating threatening behaviors, verbal/emotional abuse, and physical abuse, and boys were more likely to report perpetrating sexual abuse. Involvement in bullying positively predicted perpetration of TDV, albeit, in different ways for boys and girls. Other risk factors differed by sex. For instance, alcohol use and sex initiation predicted multiple forms of TDV perpetration for boys, whereas weapon carrying and emotional symptoms predicted several forms of TDV perpetration for girls. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of TDV was high in our sample. Important sex differences in rates of perpetration and risk factors emerged. Comprehensive prevention programs that target TDV and related risk factors, such as bullying and other risk factors, seem warranted. Published by Elsevier Inc.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This study describes the lifetime prevalence of teen dating violence (TDV) perpetration in a sample of middle school students from high-risk urban communities and examines the relation between TDV and related cognitive and behavioral risk factors. METHODS: Surveys were administered to 2,895 middle school students in four U.S. cities; 1,673 students (58%) reported having dated and were included in analyses. The sample was 52.3% female, 48.2% non-Hispanic black/African-American, 38.2% Hispanic, 4.8% non-Hispanic white, and 7.6% other race. Six types of TDV perpetration were assessed: threatening behaviors, verbal/emotional abuse, relational abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and stalking. RESULTS: Of the students who had dated, 77% reported perpetrating verbal/emotional abuse, 32% reported perpetrating physical abuse, 20% reported threatening a partner, 15% reported perpetrating sexual abuse, 13% reported perpetrating relational abuse, and 6% reported stalking. Girls were more likely than boys to report perpetrating threatening behaviors, verbal/emotional abuse, and physical abuse, and boys were more likely to report perpetrating sexual abuse. Involvement in bullying positively predicted perpetration of TDV, albeit, in different ways for boys and girls. Other risk factors differed by sex. For instance, alcohol use and sex initiation predicted multiple forms of TDV perpetration for boys, whereas weapon carrying and emotional symptoms predicted several forms of TDV perpetration for girls. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of TDV was high in our sample. Important sex differences in rates of perpetration and risk factors emerged. Comprehensive prevention programs that target TDV and related risk factors, such as bullying and other risk factors, seem warranted. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
High risk; Middle school; Risk factors; Teen dating violence
Authors: Elizabeth Miller; Daniel J Tancredi; Heather L McCauley; Michele R Decker; Maria Catrina D Virata; Heather A Anderson; Brian O'Connor; Jay G Silverman Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Danice K Eaton; Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; Shari Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Joseph Hawkins; William A Harris; Richard Lowry; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Connie Lim; Howell Wechsler Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2012-06-08
Authors: David A Wolfe; Claire Crooks; Peter Jaffe; Debbie Chiodo; Ray Hughes; Wendy Ellis; Larry Stitt; Allan Donner Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2009-08
Authors: Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; Shari L Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Joseph Kawkins; William A Harris; Richard Lowry; Emily O'Malley Olsen; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Eboni Taylor; Zewditu Demissie; Nancy Brener; Jemekia Thornton; John Moore; Stephanie Zaza Journal: MMWR Suppl Date: 2014-06-13
Authors: Natasha E Latzman; Alana M Vivolo-Kantor; Phyllis Holditch Niolon; Sharon R Ghazarian Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Ryan C Shorey; Brian Wymbs; Liz Torres; Joseph R Cohen; Paula J Fite; Jeff R Temple Journal: Aggress Behav Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 2.917
Authors: Melissa F Peskin; Christine M Markham; Ross Shegog; Jeff R Temple; Elizabeth R Baumler; Robert C Addy; Belinda Hernandez; Paula Cuccaro; Efrat K Gabay; Melanie Thiel; Susan Tortolero Emery Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2016-09-24