Literature DB >> 25620031

Validation of two accelerometers to determine mechanical loading of physical activities in children.

Ursina Meyer1, Dominique Ernst, Silvia Schott, Claudia Riera, Jan Hattendorf, Jacqueline Romkes, Urs Granacher, Beat Göpfert, Susi Kriemler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of accelerometers using force plates (i.e., ground reaction force (GRF)) during the performance of different tasks of daily physical activity in children. Thirteen children (10.1 (range 5.4-15.7) years, 3 girls) wore two accelerometers (ActiGraph GT3X+ (ACT), GENEA (GEN)) at the hip that provide raw acceleration signals at 100 Hz. Participants completed different tasks (walking, jogging, running, landings from boxes of different height, rope skipping, dancing) on a force plate. GRF was collected for one step per trial (10 trials) for ambulatory movements and for all landings (10 trials), rope skips and dance procedures. Accelerometer outputs as peak loading (g) per activity were averaged. ANOVA, correlation analyses and Bland-Altman plots were computed to determine validity of accelerometers using GRF. There was a main effect of task with increasing acceleration values in tasks with increasing locomotion speed and landing height (P < 0.001). Data from ACT and GEN correlated with GRF (r = 0.90 and 0.89, respectively) and between each other (r = 0.98), but both accelerometers consistently overestimated GRF. The new generation of accelerometer models that allow raw signal detection are reasonably accurate to measure impact loading of bone in children, although they systematically overestimate GRF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; children; ground reaction force; impact loading; physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25620031     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1004638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  7 in total

1.  Characterization of Vertical Accelerations Experienced by Older People Attending an Aerobics Class Designed to Produce High Impacts.

Authors:  Kimberly Hannam; Kevin Deere; Sue Worrall; April Hartley; Jon H Tobias
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 1.961

2.  Relationship between Social Isolation and Indoor and Outdoor Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Germany: Findings from the ActiFE Study

Authors:  Florian Herbolsheimer; Stephanie Mosler; Phil Richard Peter
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  App-technology to improve lifestyle behaviors among working adults - the Health Integrator study, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephanie E Bonn; Marie Löf; Claes-Göran Östenson; Ylva Trolle Lagerros
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Validity of New Technologies That Measure Bone-Related Dietary and Physical Activity Risk Factors in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alyse Davies; Yumeng Shi; Adrian Bauman; Margaret Allman-Farinelli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Validity of load rate estimation using accelerometers during physical activity on an anti-gravity treadmill.

Authors:  Susan Nazirizadeh; Maria Stokes; Nigel K Arden; Alexander Ij Forrester
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2021-06-02

Review 6.  Indirect Measurement of Ground Reaction Forces and Moments by Means of Wearable Inertial Sensors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Ancillao; Salvatore Tedesco; John Barton; Brendan O'Flynn
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Lauren C Benson; Anu M Räisänen; Christian A Clermont; Reed Ferber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.