Literature DB >> 25619829

A novel recurrent CHEK2 Y390C mutation identified in high-risk Chinese breast cancer patients impairs its activity and is associated with increased breast cancer risk.

N Wang1, H Ding2, C Liu1,2, X Li2, L Wei1,3, J Yu2, M Liu2, M Ying1, W Gao1, H Jiang2, Y Wang1,4.   

Abstract

Certain predisposition factors such as BRCA1/2 and CHEK2 mutations cause familial breast cancers that occur early. In China, breast cancers are diagnosed at relatively younger age, and higher percentage of patients are diagnosed before 40 years, than that in Caucasians. However, the prevalence for BRCA1/2 mutations and reported CHEK2 germline mutations is much lower or absent in Chinese population, arguing for the need to study other novel risk alleles among Chinese breast cancer patients. In this study, we searched for CHEK2 mutations in young, high-risk breast cancer patients in China and detected a missense variant Y390C (1169A > G) in 12 of 150 patients (8.0%) and 2 in 250 healthy controls (0.8%, P = 0.0002). Four of the Y390C carriers have family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. In patients without family history, Y390C carriers tend to develop breast cancer early, before 35 years of age. The codon change at Y390, a highly conserved residue located in CHEK2's kinase domain, appeared to significantly impair CHEK2 activity. Functional analysis suggested that the CHEK2 Y390C mutation is deleterious as judged by the mutant protein's inability to inactivate CDC25A or to activate p53 after DNA damage. Cells expressing the CHEK2 Y390C variant showed impaired p21 and Puma expression after DNA damage, and the deregulated cell cycle checkpoint and apoptotic response may help conserve mutations and therefore contribute to tumorigeneisis. Taken together, our results not only identified a novel CHEK2 allele that is associated with cancer families and confers increased breast cancer risk, but also showed that this allele significantly impairs CHEK2 function during DNA damage response. Our results provide further insight on how the function of such an important cancer gene may be impaired by existing mutations to facilitate tumorigenesis. It also offers a new subject for breast cancer monitoring, prevention and management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25619829     DOI: 10.1038/onc.2014.443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  44 in total

1.  A CHEK2 genetic variant contributing to a substantial fraction of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Pia Vahteristo; Jirina Bartkova; Hannaleena Eerola; Kirsi Syrjäkoski; Salla Ojala; Outi Kilpivaara; Anitta Tamminen; Juha Kononen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Päivi Heikkilä; Kaija Holli; Carl Blomqvist; Jiri Bartek; Olli-P Kallioniemi; Heli Nevanlinna
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-07-28       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Evidence against a major genetic basis for combined breast and colorectal cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  H Brinkman; J Barwell; S Rose; L Tinworth; N Sodha; C Langman; L Brooks; S Payne; S Fisher; A Rowan; I Tomlinson; S Hodgson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Ten genes for inherited breast cancer.

Authors:  Tom Walsh; Mary-Claire King
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  About 1% of the breast and ovarian Spanish families testing negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 are carriers of RAD51D pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez; Sandra Bonache; Gorka Ruíz de Garibay; Ana Osorio; Marta Santamariña; Teresa Ramón y Cajal; Eva Esteban-Cardeñosa; Anna Tenés; Kira Yanowsky; Alicia Barroso; Gemma Montalban; Ana Blanco; Mònica Cornet; Neus Gadea; Mar Infante; Trinidad Caldés; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Judith Balmaña; Adriana Lasa; Ana Vega; Javier Benítez; Miguel de la Hoya; Orland Diez
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Characterization of tumor-associated Chk2 mutations.

Authors:  X Wu; S R Webster; J Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-26       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jirina Bartkova; Zuzana Horejsí; Karen Koed; Alwin Krämer; Frederic Tort; Karsten Zieger; Per Guldberg; Maxwell Sehested; Jahn M Nesland; Claudia Lukas; Torben Ørntoft; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene.

Authors:  Alfons Meindl; Heide Hellebrand; Constanze Wiek; Verena Erven; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Dieter Niederacher; Marcel Freund; Peter Lichtner; Linda Hartmann; Heiner Schaal; Juliane Ramser; Ellen Honisch; Christian Kubisch; Hans E Wichmann; Karin Kast; Helmut Deissler; Christoph Engel; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Kornelia Neveling; Marion Kiechle; Christopher G Mathew; Detlev Schindler; Rita K Schmutzler; Helmut Hanenberg
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  The alternative product from the human CDKN2A locus, p14(ARF), participates in a regulatory feedback loop with p53 and MDM2.

Authors:  F J Stott; S Bates; M C James; B B McConnell; M Starborg; S Brookes; I Palmero; K Ryan; E Hara; K H Vousden; G Peters
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  CHK2 kinase: cancer susceptibility and cancer therapy - two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  Laurent Antoni; Nayanta Sodha; Ian Collins; Michelle D Garrett
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Breast cancer in Chinese women younger than age 40: are they different from their older counterparts?

Authors:  Ava Kwong; Polly Cheung; Stephanie Chan; Silvia Lau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genomic analysis reveals frequent TRAF7 mutations in intraneural perineuriomas.

Authors:  Christopher J Klein; Yanhong Wu; Mark E Jentoft; Georges Mer; Robert J Spinner; P James B Dyck; Peter J Dyck; Michelle L Mauermann
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  KinView: a visual comparative sequence analysis tool for integrated kinome research.

Authors:  Daniel Ian McSkimming; Shima Dastgheib; Timothy R Baffi; Dominic P Byrne; Samantha Ferries; Steven Thomas Scott; Alexandra C Newton; Claire E Eyers; Krzysztof J Kochut; Patrick A Eyers; Natarajan Kannan
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2016-11-15

3.  Functional interrogation of DNA damage response variants with base editing screens.

Authors:  Raquel Cuella-Martin; Samuel B Hayward; Xiao Fan; Xiao Chen; Jen-Wei Huang; Angelo Taglialatela; Giuseppe Leuzzi; Junfei Zhao; Raul Rabadan; Chao Lu; Yufeng Shen; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  CHEK2 represses breast stromal fibroblasts and their paracrine tumor-promoting effects through suppressing SDF-1 and IL-6.

Authors:  Maha A Al-Rakan; Siti-Faujiah Hendrayani; Abdelilah Aboussekhra
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Prevalence of the CHEK2 R95* germline mutation.

Authors:  Stian Knappskog; Beryl Leirvaag; Liv B Gansmo; Pål Romundstad; Kristian Hveem; Lars Vatten; Per E Lønning
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.857

6.  Recurrent Germline Mutations of CHEK2 as a New Susceptibility Gene in Patients with Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas.

Authors:  Yinjie Gao; Chao Ling; Xiaosen Ma; Huiping Wang; Yunying Cui; Min Nie; Anli Tong
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.257

7.  Study on the Mechanism of Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinase 2 (CHEK2) Gene Dysfunction in Chemotherapeutic Drug Resistance of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Li Luo; Wei Gao; Jinghui Wang; Dingxue Wang; Xiaobo Peng; Zhaoyang Jia; Ye Jiang; Gongzhuo Li; Dongxin Tang; Yajie Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-05-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.