Literature DB >> 25619516

Insulin-like growth factor--phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase signaling in canine cortisol-secreting adrenocortical tumors.

M M J Kool1, S Galac, N van der Helm, S Corradini, H S Kooistra, J A Mol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypercortisolism is a common endocrine disorder in dogs, caused by a cortisol-secreting adrenocortical tumor (AT) in approximately 15% of cases. In adrenocortical carcinomas of humans, activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway by insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling represents a promising therapeutic target.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the involvement of PI3K signaling in the pathogenesis of ATs in dogs and to identify pathway components that may hold promise as future therapeutic targets or as prognostic markers. ANIMALS: Analyses were performed on 36 canine cortisol-secreting ATs (11 adenomas and 25 carcinomas) and 15 normal adrenal glands of dogs.
METHODS: mRNA expression analysis was performed for PI3K target genes, PI3K inhibitor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), IGFs, IGF receptors, IGF binding proteins and epidermal growth factor receptors. Mutation analysis was performed on genes encoding PTEN and PI3K catalytic subunit (PIK3CA).
RESULTS: Target gene expression indicated PI3K activation in carcinomas, but not in adenomas. No amino acid-changing mutations were detected in PTEN or PIK3CA and no significant alterations in IGF-II or IGFR1 expression were detected. In carcinomas, ERBB2 expression tended to be higher than in normal adrenal glands, and higher expression of inhibitor of differentiation 1 and 2 (ID1 and ID2) was detected in carcinomas with recurrence within 2.5 years after adrenalectomy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Based on these results, ERBB2 might be a promising therapeutic target in ATs in dogs, whereas ID1 and 2 might be valuable as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets.
Copyright © 2015 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adrenal; Dog; Hypercortisolism; Insulin-like growth factor; Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25619516      PMCID: PMC4858057          DOI: 10.1111/jvim.12528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Intern Med        ISSN: 0891-6640            Impact factor:   3.333


adrenocortical carcinoma adrenocortical tumor B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein cyclin D1 epidermal growth factor epidermal growth factor receptor erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog beta‐glucuronidase hypoxantine phosphoribosiltransferase inhibitor of differentiation insulin‐like growth factor binding protein insulin‐like growth factor insulin‐like growth factor receptor insulin receptor mammalian target of rapamycin phosphorylated AKT phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase catalytic subunit phosphatase and tensin homolog quantitative RT‐PCR ribosomal protein S19 ribosomal protein S5 serum glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1 snail slug small proline rich protein tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10 untranslated region X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis Hypercortisolism is 1 of the most common endocrine disorders in dogs.1 Approximately, 15% of spontaneous cases of hypercortisolism in dogs are due to cortisol‐secreting adrenocortical adenomas or carcinomas.1 Therapeutic options for dogs with adrenocortical tumors (ATs) are limited: complete adrenalectomy of the affected adrenal gland is the treatment of choice, provided no metastases are present at the time of presentation.2, 3 However, surgery is not possible or successful in all cases, and tumor recurrence and metastasis occur regularly.4 Options for medical management are limited to mitotane, a chemotherapeutic agent, or trilostane, which can only alleviate the clinical signs of hypercortisolism. The lack of reliable prognostic markers further complicates treatment. A pathway with the potential to provide both therapeutic targets and prognostic markers is the phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway (Fig 1). The PI3K pathway is 1 of the most frequently activated signal transduction pathways in cancers of humans, the activation of which also has been documented in ATs in humans.5, 6, 7 Pathway activation is initiated by receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the type 1 insulin‐like growth factor (IGF) receptor (IGFR1) or dimers of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor family (EGFR, ERBB2–4), and counteracted by the competitive PI3K inhibitor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). Upon activation of the PI3K pathway, phosphorylated AKT (p‐AKT) and its downstream effectors stimulate cell proliferation, survival and growth by transcriptional and posttranslational mechanisms.5
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway. Upon ligand binding, the epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR and ERBB 2–4) form homo‐ and heterodimers, activating their tyrosine kinase domain. The IGF receptors (IGFR1 and IGFR2) are activated by the binding of insulin‐like growth factor (IGF) I or II. IGF actions are modulated by high affinity IGF binding proteins (IGFBP 2–6). IGFR1 and the EGF receptors relay their intracellular signal to PI3K, which converts the inactive PIP2 to the active PIP3. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) counters PI3K action by converting PIP3 back to PIP2. PIP3 production leads to the phosphorylation of AKT to phospho‐AKT (P‐AKT), which in turn activates SGK1 and XIAP through phosphorylation, while it induces mRNA expression of target genes ID1, ID2, SNAI1, SNAI2, BCL2L1 and CCND1, and inhibits mRNA expression of TRAIL. Through its target genes, activation of the PI3K pathway results in increased cell survival, proliferation and growth. Target genes for qPCR analysis in this study are indicated in dark gray. SGK1, serum glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1; XIAP, X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis; ID1, inhibitor of differentiation 1; ID2, inhibitor of differentiation 2; SNAI1, snail; SNAI2, slug; BCL2L1, B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein; CCND1, cyclin D1; TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10.

Schematic representation of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway. Upon ligand binding, the epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR and ERBB 2–4) form homo‐ and heterodimers, activating their tyrosine kinase domain. The IGF receptors (IGFR1 and IGFR2) are activated by the binding of insulin‐like growth factor (IGF) I or II. IGF actions are modulated by high affinity IGF binding proteins (IGFBP 2–6). IGFR1 and the EGF receptors relay their intracellular signal to PI3K, which converts the inactive PIP2 to the active PIP3. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) counters PI3K action by converting PIP3 back to PIP2. PIP3 production leads to the phosphorylation of AKT to phospho‐AKT (P‐AKT), which in turn activates SGK1 and XIAP through phosphorylation, while it induces mRNA expression of target genes ID1, ID2, SNAI1, SNAI2, BCL2L1 and CCND1, and inhibits mRNA expression of TRAIL. Through its target genes, activation of the PI3K pathway results in increased cell survival, proliferation and growth. Target genes for qPCR analysis in this study are indicated in dark gray. SGK1, serum glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1; XIAP, X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis; ID1, inhibitor of differentiation 1; ID2, inhibitor of differentiation 2; SNAI1, snail; SNAI2, slug; BCL2L1, B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein; CCND1, cyclin D1; TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10. The PI3K pathway contains multiple targets for therapeutic intervention, the choice of which depends on the mode of activation. In adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) of humans, frequent overexpression of IGF‐II and IGFR1 indicates IGF‐signaling as a likely mode for PI3K activation.8, 9, 10 Selective IGFR1 kinase inhibitors thus could be of benefit, and indeed have shown antitumor effects both in cell culture studies and preclinical and early phase clinical trials in humans with ACC.6, 10 For EGFR‐induced PI3K pathway activation, several specific inhibitors already have been approved for clinical use in humans.11 Activation of the PI3K pathway also may occur downstream of the receptors, for instance as a result of mutations in the genes encoding PTEN or the PI3K catalytic subunit (PIK3CA) or because of decreased expression of PTEN.12, 13 In these cases, single or dual inhibitors of PIK3CA and mTOR could be employed.14 In a human ACC cell line, use of these compounds has resulted in decreased cell proliferation and cortisol secretion.15, 16 In ACC of humans, IGF‐II is the most frequently and strongly overexpressed gene,17, 18 whereas in adenomas overexpression occurs only rarely.18, 19 Additionally, high IGF‐II expression in ACC of humans is associated with aggressive tumor behavior and increased risk of metastasis.20, 21 Therefore, in humans IGF‐II is a diagnostic and prognostic marker for ATs. The aim of this study was to investigate involvement of the PI3K signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of cortisol‐secreting ATs in dogs, to identify pathway components that may hold promise as future therapeutic targets or may serve as prognostic markers. Pathway activation was evaluated by means of target gene expression analysis, whereas mRNA expression analysis and mutation analysis were used to indicate mode of activation.

Materials and Methods

Patient Material

Patient material used in this study consisted of 36 cortisol‐secreting ATs from dogs and 15 whole tissue explants of normal canine adrenal glands. All normal adrenal glands from healthy dogs were available as archived tissue for comparison with AT tissue obtained from patients. The tumor group consisted of histologically confirmed ATs from patients with clinical signs of hypercortisolism, referred to the Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Utrecht between 2001 and 2012. The diagnosis of ACTH‐independent hypercortisolism because of a cortisol‐secreting AT was based upon (1) increased urinary corticoid‐to‐creatinine ratios, that were not suppressible with high doses of dexamethasone, (2) suppressed or undetectable basal plasma ACTH concentrations1 and (3) demonstration of an AT by ultrasonography, computed tomography or both.22 All dogs subsequently underwent unilateral adrenalectomy. The dogs’ ages at the time of surgery ranged from 2 to 12 years (mean, 9 years). Seven dogs were mongrels and the other dogs were of 22 different breeds. Eighteen of the dogs were male (8 castrated) and 18 female (12 spayed). After resection, all ATs and normal adrenal glands were immediately put on ice for inspection, and material was saved for quantitative RT‐PCR (qPCR) analysis and histopathology. Fragments for RNA isolation were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen within 10 minutes after resection and stored at −80°C until further use. The remaining part of the tissue was immersed in formalin for fixation and embedded in paraffin after 24–48 hours. Permission to use the AT tissue for this study was obtained from all patient owners and the study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Utrecht University.

Histopathology

Histopathological evaluation was performed on formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded tissue slides of all samples and used to confirm the diagnosis and classify the tumors. All histological evaluations were performed by a single pathologist. Classification was performed based on criteria described previously.23 Classification as a carcinoma was based on histological evidence of vascular invasion, peripheral fibrosis, capsular invasion, trabecular growth, hemorrhage, necrosis, and single cell necrosis. Typical histological characteristics of adenomas were hematopoiesis, fibrin thrombi, and cytoplasmic vacuolization. Based on these criteria, the tumor group consisted of 11 adenomas and 25 carcinomas.

Follow‐up

Of the dogs in the tumor group, follow‐up information was available for 15 dogs with histologically confirmed carcinomas: 7 of these dogs developed signs of hypercortisolism within 2.5 years after surgical removal of the tumor. Recurrence of hypercortisolism was confirmed by endocrine testing, and was caused by metastases in 6 of these dogs, and by regrowth of the AT in 1 dog. The remaining 8 dogs were in remission for at least 2.5 years after adrenalectomy.

Total RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription

Total RNA for quantitative RT‐PCR analysis was isolated from the adrenal tissue using the RNeasy mini kit,1 according to manufacturer's protocols. An additional DNAse step was performed to avoid genomic DNA contamination. RNA concentrations were measured on the NanoDrop ND‐1000.2 Synthesis of cDNA was performed using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit,3 according to the manufacturer's protocols. For all samples, 1 cDNA reaction was performed without reverse transcriptase (RT−), to check for contamination with genomic DNA.

Quantitative RT‐PCR

Primers for qPCR were designed to detect the mRNA expression levels of PI3K pathway target genes (Table 1), PI3K pathway inhibitor PTEN and major components of the IGF and EGF axis (Table 2). Primer design was performed using Perl‐primer v1.1.14 according to the parameters in the Bio‐Rad iCycler manual, and primers were ordered from Eurogentec.4 For all primer pairs, a temperature gradient was performed to determine the optimal annealing temperature. Formation of the proper PCR products was confirmed by a sequencing reaction, using the ABI3130XL Genetic analyzer5 according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Table 1

Quantitative RT‐PCR primer pairs for the detection of PI3K target genes: SNAI1, SNAI2, BCL2L1, ID1 and ID2, CCND1, SGK11, TNFSF10 or TRAIL, and XIAP. All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website

qPCR Primers (Position)Sequence (5′–3′)Annealing Temperature (°C)Product Length (bp)
cf_SNAI1
FwCAA GAT GCA CAT CCG AAG C61.6133
RvCAG TGG GAG CAG GAA AAC
cf_SNAI2
FwCTT CAC TCC GAC TCC AAA CG60148
RvTGG ATT TTG TGC TCT TGC AG
cf_BCL2L1
FwGGG GTG GTG AGG TAC AAA AA61.6112
RvCTG GGT CTA GCG TCC AAA AG
cf_ID1
FwCTC AAC GGC GAG ATC AG59.5135
RvGAG CAC GGG TTC TTC TC
cf_ID2
FwGCT GAA TAA ATG GTG TTC GTG60.5114
RvGTT GTT CTC CTT GTG AAA TGG
cf_CCND1
FwGCC TCG AAG ATG AAG GAG AC60117
RvCAG TTT GTT CAC CAG GAG CA
cf_TNFSF10
FwGCT GAT CCT CAT CTT CAC TG6290
RvTCC TGC ATC TGC TTC AG
cf_SGK11
FwTGG GCC TGA ACG ACT TTA TT62124
RvGAG GGG TTG GCA TTC ATA AG
cf_XIAP
FwACT ATG TAT CAC TTG AGG CTC TGG TTT C5480
RvAGT CTG GCT TGA TTC ATC TTG TGT TAT G

Accession numbers used: SNAI1: XM_543048.1; SNAI2: XM_543048.1; CDH1: XM_536807.3; BCL2L1: NM_001003072.1; ID1: XM_847117.2; ID2: XR_134413.1; CCND1: NM_001005757.1; SGK11: XM_003432525.1; TNFSF10: NM_001130836; XIAP: XM_003435664.1.

PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase; SNAI1, snail; SNAI2, slug; BCL2L1, B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein; ID1 and ID2, inhibitor of DNA binding 1 and 2; CCND1, CyclinD1; SGK11, serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1; TNFSF10 or TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10; XIAP, X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis; Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer.

Table 2

qPCR primer pairs for the detection of genes encoding components of the IGF‐ and EGF axis, and PTEN: EGFR, ERBB2–4, PTEN, IGF‐I and IGF‐II, IGFR1 and IGFR2, IGFBP 2–6, and INSR. All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website

qPCR Primers (Position)Sequence (5′–3′)Annealing Temperature (°C)Product Length (bp)
cf_EGFR
FwCTG GAG CAT TCG GCA53107
RvTGG CTT TGG GAG ACG
cf_ERBB2
FwCGT GCT GGA CAA TGG AGA CC64126
RvCCG CTG AAT CAA GAC CCC TC
cf_ERBB3
FwTAG TGG TGA AGG ACA ACG GCA G64103
RvGGT CTT GGT CAA TGT CTG GCA G
cf_ERBB4
FwCAG TTC TTG TGT GCG TGC CTG70121
RvATG ATC CTG TGC CGA TGC C
cf_PTEN
FwAGA TGT TAG TGA CAA TGA ACC T62101
RvGTG ATT TGT GTG TGC TGA TC
cf_IGF‐I
FwTGT CCT CCT CGC ATC TCT T58125
RvGTC TCC GCA CAC GAA CTG
cf_IGF‐II
FwCTT CTG GAG ACC TAC TGT GC61128
RvCTG CTT CCA GGT GTC GTA TTG
cf_IGFR1
FwCAT GCC TTG GTC TCC CTG T60129
RvGGT GGT CCC AAT CCC AAA G
cf_IGFR2
FwGAG TTC AGC CACG AGA C5494
RvGCA TTG TCA CCA TCA AGG
cf_IGFBP2
FwGAT CTC CAC CAT GCA CCT TC60127
RvGCT GCC CGT TCA GAG ACA TCT TG
cf_IGFBP3
FwCTG CAC ACG AAG ATG GAT GT61127
RvTAT TCC GTC TCC CGC TTG TA
cf_IGFBP4
FwAGC CTG CAG CCC TCT GAC A59120
RvTGG TGC TGC GGT CTC GAA T
cf_IGFBP5
FwTCG CAG AAA GAA GCT GAC C60131
RvGAA GCC TCC ATG TGT CTG C
cf_IGFBP6
FwCAA TCC TGG TGG TGT CC54136
RvAGA AGC CCT TAT GGT CAC
cf_INSR
FwGTG ACA GAC TAT TTA GAT GTC CC60166
RvACT CAG GGT TTG AAG AAG C

Accession numbers used: EGFR: XM_533073.3; ERBB2: NM_001003217.1; ERBB3: XM_538226.4; ERBB4: XM_003640190.2; PTEN: NM_001003192.1; IGF‐I: XM_848024.1; IGF‐II: XM_858107.1; IGFR1: XM_853622.1; IGF‐IIR: NM_001122602; IGFBP2: XM_545637.2; IGFBP3: XM_548740.2; IGFBP4: XM_845091.1; IGFBP5: XM_847792.1; IGFBP6: XM_844250; INSR: XM_542108.

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERBB2–4, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2–4; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; IGF‐I and IGF‐II, insulin‐like growth factor 1 and 2; IGFR1 and IGFR2, IFG receptor type 1 and 2; IGFBP 2–6, IGF binding protein 2–6; INSR, insulin receptor; Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer.

Quantitative RT‐PCR primer pairs for the detection of PI3K target genes: SNAI1, SNAI2, BCL2L1, ID1 and ID2, CCND1, SGK11, TNFSF10 or TRAIL, and XIAP. All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website Accession numbers used: SNAI1: XM_543048.1; SNAI2: XM_543048.1; CDH1: XM_536807.3; BCL2L1: NM_001003072.1; ID1: XM_847117.2; ID2: XR_134413.1; CCND1: NM_001005757.1; SGK11: XM_003432525.1; TNFSF10: NM_001130836; XIAP: XM_003435664.1. PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase; SNAI1, snail; SNAI2, slug; BCL2L1, B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein; ID1 and ID2, inhibitor of DNA binding 1 and 2; CCND1, CyclinD1; SGK11, serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1; TNFSF10 or TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10; XIAP, X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis; Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer. qPCR primer pairs for the detection of genes encoding components of the IGF‐ and EGF axis, and PTEN: EGFR, ERBB2–4, PTEN, IGF‐I and IGF‐II, IGFR1 and IGFR2, IGFBP 2–6, and INSR. All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website Accession numbers used: EGFR: XM_533073.3; ERBB2: NM_001003217.1; ERBB3: XM_538226.4; ERBB4: XM_003640190.2; PTEN: NM_001003192.1; IGF‐I: XM_848024.1; IGF‐II: XM_858107.1; IGFR1: XM_853622.1; IGF‐IIR: NM_001122602; IGFBP2: XM_545637.2; IGFBP3: XM_548740.2; IGFBP4: XM_845091.1; IGFBP5: XM_847792.1; IGFBP6: XM_844250; INSR: XM_542108. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERBB2–4, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2–4; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; IGF‐I and IGF‐II, insulin‐like growth factor 1 and 2; IGFR1 and IGFR2, IFG receptor type 1 and 2; IGFBP 2–6, IGF binding protein 2–6; INSR, insulin receptor; Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer. For mRNA expression analysis of the EGF receptors, PI3K target genes and PTEN, a 10× diluted pool of cDNA samples was used to create a 4‐fold standard dilution series. The remaining cDNA was diluted 5 times with milliQ water, to achieve a working stock. Reactions were performed on a CFX384 real‐time PCR detection system.3 The following genes were measured as follows: EGF receptor (EGFR), erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2–4 (ERBB2–4), snail (SNAI1), slug (SNAI2), B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein (BCL2L1), cyclinD1 (CCND1), inhibitor of differentiation 1 and 2 (ID1 and ID2), tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10 (TNFSF10 or TRAIL), serum glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1 (SGK1), X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) and PTEN. To correct for differences in cDNA concentration, ribosomal protein S5 (RPS5), RPS19, small proline rich protein (SPRP) and hypoxantine phosphoribosiltransferase (HPRT) were used as reference genes.24, 25 For mRNA expression analysis of IGF‐I, IGF‐II, IGFR1, IGFR2, IGF binding proteins (IGFBP 2–6) and the insulin receptor (INSR), an undiluted pool of cDNA samples was used to create a 4‐fold standard dilution series. The remainder of the cDNA was diluted 10 times with milliQ water, to achieve a working stock. Reactions were performed on a MyIQ single color real‐time PCR detection system.3 To correct for differences in cDNA concentration, RPS5, RPS19, SPRP and beta‐glucuronidase (GUSB) were used as reference genes.24, 25 Detection was performed using SYBRgreen supermix3 and data were analyzed using CFX Manager 3.03 for the CFX384 real‐time PCR data and using iQ5 software3 for the MyIQ single color real‐time PCR data. The raw data were used to calculate the reaction efficiency. Reaction efficiencies between 90% and 110% were accepted. Analysis of the relative expression levels of the reference genes disclosed no significant differences among groups and reference gene expression was shown to be stable using GeNorm software,21 justifying the use as reference genes. Calculation of normalized relative expression levels for each of the target genes was performed using the 2−ΔΔCT method.26

Mutation Analysis

Mutation analysis was performed on PTEN and PIK3CA. Primers for PCR amplification (Table 3) and sequence primers (Table 4) were designed using Perl‐primer v1.1.14 according to BioRad iCycler parameters, and ordered from Eurogentec.4 Sequence primers were located along the entire transcript, at a distance of 300–500 bp apart, or closer together when needed for complete coverage. Amplification primers were located in the 3′ and 5′untranslated regions (UTRs) of the gene to ensure amplification of the complete coding region. For PTEN, the canine 3′ UTR is not annotated and was deduced from the human 3′ UTR and the canine genomic sequence. If a gene could not be amplified in 1 stretch, overlapping primer pairs were used. All amplification primers were tested on a pool of adrenal samples, to determine the optimal annealing temperature. Correct product formation was evaluated by means of gel electrophoresis and sequencing.
Table 3

PCR primers pairs for amplification of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA). All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website

PCR Primers (Position)Sequence (5′–3′)Annealing Temperature (°C)Product Length (bp)
cf_PTEN
Fw75TCC TCC TTC CTC TCC AG55748
Rv822TGA ACT TGT CTT CCC GTC
Fw718CAA TGT TCA GTG GCG GA55743
Rv1460CGA GAT TGG TCA GGA AGA G
cf_PIK3CA
F1TTT CTG CTT TGG GAC AGC551536
R1537CTG GGA ACT TTA CCA CAC TG
Fw1438TGC TGA ACC CTA TTG GTG55449
Rv1887TAC AGT CCA GAA GCT CCA
Fw1516GCA GTG TGG TAA AGT TCC551843
Rv3359CAG TCT TTG CCT GTT GAC

Accession numbers used: PTEN: NM_001003192.1; PIK3CA: XM_545208.3.

Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer.

Table 4

Sequencing primers for the mutation analysis of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA). All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website

Sequence Primers (Position)Sequence (5′–3′)
cf_PTEN
Fw474CAC TGT AAA GCT GGA AAG GG
Fw1157TGT AGA GGA GCC ATC AAA CC
Rv249CAA AGG GTT CAT TCT CTG GG
Rv595TGT CTC TGG TCC TTA CTT CC
Rv1285CCT GTA TAC GCC TTC AAG TC
cf_PIK3CA
Fw375GTA ATT GAG CCA GTA GGC
Fw707CAA CCA TGA CTG TGT TCC
Fw1153TCT ATC ATG GAG GAG AAC CC
Fw1483CTC CAT GCT TAG AGT TGG AG
Fw1767CTA CCC AAA CTG CTT CTG
Fw2183TAG GCA AGT TGA GGC TAT GG
Fw2582TGG TTG TCT GTC AAT CGG
Fw2806TGG GAA TTG GAG ATC GTC
Fw2963GAT TAG TAA AGG AGC CCA GG
Rv358AAA GCC GAA GGT CAC AAA GC
Rv730GTT CTG GAA CAC AGT CAT GG
Rv1236TAG CCA TTC ATT CCA CCT GG
Rv1750CAC AAT AGT GTC TGT GGC TC
Rv2205TTC CAT AGC CTC AAC TTG CC
Rv2642GTG TGA GAA TTT CGC ACC
Rv2993TTT GTG CAT TCC TGG GCT
Rv3271CAT GCT GCT TAA TGG TGT GG

Accession numbers used: PTEN: NM_001003192.1; PIK3CA: XM_545208.3.

Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer.

PCR primers pairs for amplification of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA). All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website Accession numbers used: PTEN: NM_001003192.1; PIK3CA: XM_545208.3. Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer. Sequencing primers for the mutation analysis of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA). All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website Accession numbers used: PTEN: NM_001003192.1; PIK3CA: XM_545208.3. Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer. After PCR optimization, target genes in all samples were amplified on a C1000 Touch thermal cycler3 using Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase.6 The PCR products were amplified for sequencing using the BigDye Terminator version 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit7 and filtrated using Sephadex G‐50 Superfine.8 Sequencing reactions were performed on an ABI3130XL Genetic analyzer, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sequences obtained were aligned to the NCBI consensus mRNA sequence using DNAstar Lasergene core suite 9.1 SeqMan software. Mutations altering the amino acid sequence were confirmed by repeat RNA extraction and sequencing in both sense and antisense directions.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS20.9 Because of the non‐normal distribution of most of the variables, the nonparametric Mann‐Whitney U‐test was used to compare mRNA expression levels among groups. The relative mRNA expression levels were compared between ATs (adenomas and carcinomas) and normal adrenals and between ATs with and without recurrent disease. For the first comparison, a Bonferroni correction was applied and P < .025 was considered significant, whereas for the latter comparison, a P < .05 was considered significant.

Results

Relative mRNA Expression of PI3K Target Genes

To evaluate whether activation of the PI3K pathway was present in cortisol‐secreting ATs of dogs, mRNA expression analysis was performed on a selection of 10 known target genes of the pathway. Based on the literature, PI3K activation would increase mRNA expression of ID1,27, 28 ID2,29 SNAI1 and SNAI2,30 CCND1 and BCL2L1.31 In contrast, lower mRNA expression of TRAIL 31, 32 would be expected (Fig 1). The activation of SGK1 and XIAP occurs by means of phosphorylation; so for these genes, no effect on mRNA expression would be expected33, 34 (Fig 1). In ACC of dogs, the relative mRNA expression levels when compared to those in normal adrenal glands (Fig 2A) were significantly higher for ID1 (2.1‐fold, P = .021) and SNAI1 (1.8‐fold, P = .024), and significantly lower for SGK1 (0.5‐fold, P = .009). The relative mRNA expression of TRAIL (0.6‐fold, P = .028) tended to be lower. Thus, in carcinomas 3 of the 7 transcriptionally regulated target genes showed a change in accordance with pathway activation, whereas the mRNA expression of the other genes remained unchanged.
Figure 2

Box‐and‐whisker plot describing the relative mRNA expression of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase target genes in 37 canine adrenocortical tumors (ATs) and 15 normal adrenal glands, as measured by qPCR and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method. Relative expression in adenomas and carcinomas when compared to normal adrenal glands (A). Relative expression in ATs with recurrence within 2.5 years after adrenalectomy, when compared with ATs remaining in remission for at least 2.5 years (B). Significant changes (P < .05 for A and P < .025 for B) are marked with an asterisk. N, normal adrenal gland; C, adrenocortical carcinoma; A, adrenocortical adenoma; SNAI1, snail; SNAI2, slug; BCL2L1, B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein; ID1 and ID2, inhibitor of DNA binding 1 and 2; CCND1, CyclinD1; SGK11, serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1; TNFSF1, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10; XIAP, X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis.

Box‐and‐whisker plot describing the relative mRNA expression of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase target genes in 37 canine adrenocortical tumors (ATs) and 15 normal adrenal glands, as measured by qPCR and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method. Relative expression in adenomas and carcinomas when compared to normal adrenal glands (A). Relative expression in ATs with recurrence within 2.5 years after adrenalectomy, when compared with ATs remaining in remission for at least 2.5 years (B). Significant changes (P < .05 for A and P < .025 for B) are marked with an asterisk. N, normal adrenal gland; C, adrenocortical carcinoma; A, adrenocortical adenoma; SNAI1, snail; SNAI2, slug; BCL2L1, B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein; ID1 and ID2, inhibitor of DNA binding 1 and 2; CCND1, CyclinD1; SGK11, serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1; TNFSF1, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10; XIAP, X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis. In adenomas, the mRNA expression of none of the genes showed a significant change consistent with PI3K pathway activation (Fig 2A). The only significant finding was a lower relative expression of CCND1 (0.42‐fold, P = .004) when compared to that of normal adrenal glands. When comparing dogs with recurrent disease within 2.5 years to dogs remaining in remission (Fig 2B), a significantly higher expression of both ID1 (2.0‐fold, P = .033) and ID2 (2.4‐fold, P = .019) was detected in dogs with recurrent disease. No significant changes were detected in the expression of other target genes.

Relative mRNA Expression of PTEN and the Components of IGF and EGF Signaling

To evaluate for a potential cause of PI3K activation, mRNA expression levels of the components of the IGF axis, the EGF receptors and PI3K‐inhibitor PTEN were evaluated. Analysis of the components of the IGF axis in carcinomas (Fig 3A) disclosed a significantly higher expression of IGFBP2 (5.8‐fold, P = .001) and a significantly lower expression of IGFBP5 (0.5‐fold, P = .001). Likewise, in adenomas, IGFBP2 expression was significantly higher (7.2‐fold, P = .013) and IGFBP5 expression was significantly lower (0.4‐fold, P < .001). No significant differences in the expression levels of IGF‐II or the IGFR1 were detected.
Figure 3

Box‐and‐whisker plot describing the relative mRNA expression of genes encoding components of the IGF‐ and EGF axis, and in 37 canine ATs and 15 normal adrenal glands, as measured by qPCR and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method. Relative expression in adenomas and carcinomas when compared to normal adrenal glands (A). Relative expression in ATs with recurrence within 2.5 years after adrenalectomy, when compared with ATs remaining in remission for at least 2.5 years (B). Significant changes (P < .05 for A and P < .025 for B) are marked with an asterisk. N, normal adrenal gland; C, adrenocortical carcinoma; A, adrenocortical adenoma; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; IGF‐I and 2, insulin like growth factor 1 and 2; IGFR1, IFG receptor type 1; IGF‐IIR, IGF receptor type 2; IGFBP2–6, IGF binding protein 1–6; INSR, insulin receptor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERBB2–4, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2–4.

Box‐and‐whisker plot describing the relative mRNA expression of genes encoding components of the IGF‐ and EGF axis, and in 37 canine ATs and 15 normal adrenal glands, as measured by qPCR and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method. Relative expression in adenomas and carcinomas when compared to normal adrenal glands (A). Relative expression in ATs with recurrence within 2.5 years after adrenalectomy, when compared with ATs remaining in remission for at least 2.5 years (B). Significant changes (P < .05 for A and P < .025 for B) are marked with an asterisk. N, normal adrenal gland; C, adrenocortical carcinoma; A, adrenocortical adenoma; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; IGF‐I and 2, insulin like growth factor 1 and 2; IGFR1, IFG receptor type 1; IGF‐IIR, IGF receptor type 2; IGFBP2–6, IGF binding protein 1–6; INSR, insulin receptor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERBB2–4, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2–4. Analysis of the EGF receptors in carcinomas identified a tendency to higher ERBB2 expression (1.7‐fold, P = .027) and significantly lower expression of ERBB3 (0.4‐fold, P = .003). In adenomas, the only significant change was lower ERBB3 expression (0.2‐fold, P = .001). When comparing dogs with recurrent disease within 2.5 years to dogs remaining in remission (Fig 3B), significantly higher expression of IGF‐I (2.7‐fold, P = .042), IGFBP5 (6.8‐fold, P = .042) and INSR (2.3‐fold, P = .040) was detected.

Mutation Analysis of PTEN and PIK3CA

To determine whether inactivating mutations of PTEN or activating mutations of PIK3CA might be responsible for activation of the PI3K pathway, mutation analysis was performed. Mutation analysis of PTEN identified the presence of 1 silent mutation in codon 325 (CTC>CTT), which was present in 6 ATs and occurred in both homo‐ and hetero‐zygous form. No amino acid‐changing mutations were detected in of any of the ATs. Mutation analysis of PIK3CA identified the presence of 3 different heterozygous silent mutations (codon 149 CCA>CCC, codon 438 TCT>TCA and codon 842 GTG>GTT) in 3 different ATs. No amino acid‐changing mutations were detected in any of the ATs.

Discussion

In this study, we aimed to investigate activation of the PI3K pathway in cortisol‐secreting adrenocortical adenomas and carcinomas of dogs, to identify both potential therapeutic targets and prognostic markers for use in dogs with ATs. The presence of PI3K activation was assessed by means of target gene expression analysis. In adenomas, none of the target genes showed a significant change consistent with PI3K pathway activation, and there was even a significantly lower expression of CCND1. This may be explained by the fact that adrenocortical adenomas, based on histological characteristics and tumor behavior, are a highly differentiated tumor type, and repression of CCND1 expression is thought to be a hallmark of cell differentiation.35 In line with this reasoning, lower CCND1 expression was detected in adrenocortical adenomas of humans when compared to carcinomas.36 In contrast, in ACC of dogs all target genes that showed significant alteration in mRNA expression were altered in accordance with PI3K activation. The main modes of activation of the PI3K pathway are by intracellular alterations of signaling pathway components or through receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. With regard to intracellular pathway alterations, activating mutations of PIK3CA and inactivating mutations of PTEN are well‐documented.14 In this study, no amino acid‐changing mutations were detected in either PIK3CA or PTEN and no overall decreased expression of PTEN was detected in ATs. With regard to receptor tyrosine kinase induced activation, 1 of the most strongly documented changes that can activate the PI3K pathway in ACC of humans, is activation of the IGF axis. Several studies have demonstrated that in ACC of humans, IGF‐II is the most overexpressed gene.19, 37 In the healthy individual, 1 of the alleles of the IGF‐II locus is epigenetically silenced postnatally, but in ACC genetic and epigenetic alterations in the 11p15 locus cause both alleles to be active, resulting in IGF‐II overexpression.17 Likewise, high IGF‐II protein expression is characteristic of ACC in humans.17, 18 The mechanism by which high IGF‐II expression leads to activation of the PI3K pathway is by binding IGFR1, which like IGF‐II frequently shows increased expression in ACC of humans.8, 9 Taken together, these data suggest that in ACC of humans changes in the IGF axis could be responsible for PI3K activation. This notion is supported by studies in H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells, in which IGF‐II – IGFR1 signaling results in an increase in p‐AKT.6, 7, 38 Remarkably, this study did not identify a higher expression of either IGF‐II or IGFR1 in ATs of dogs. For IGFBP2, higher mRNA expression was detected in adenomas and carcinomas of dogs. The IGFBPs function as regulatory components of IGF signaling,39 and some studies have indicated that high IGFBP2 expression may contribute to ACC pathogenesis. In murine Y1 AT cells, long‐term increased IGFBP2 expression enhanced the malignant phenotype40 and in IGF‐II‐overexpressing ACC of humans increased expression of IGFBP2 has been reported.20 However, the significance of high IGFBP2 expression in the absence of IGF‐II overexpression is unknown. Theoretically, high IGFBP2 expression could lead to higher IGF‐II availability and thus increase IGFR1/PI3K signaling. However, the fact that IGFBP2 overexpression also was detected in adenomas in the absence of increased target gene expression does not support a functional role of IGFBP2 overexpression in PI3K activation in dogs. In contrast, IGFBP5 showed an overall lower expression in ATs, but a 6.8‐fold higher expression in those carcinomas showing recurrence within 2.5 years after adrenalectomy. In different types of cancer in humans, IGFBP5 overexpression has been noted as a prognostic marker. In particular, in breast cancer, high IGFBP5 expression is associated with a shorter recurrence‐free, metastasis‐free and overall survival and IGFBP5 overexpression in breast cancer cell lines conferred resistance to IGFR1 inhibition.41 Our results therefore indicate the mRNA expression of IGFBP5 as a relevant prognostic factor in ACC in dogs. An alternative mechanism for receptor tyrosine kinase‐induced PI3K pathway activation is EGFR signaling. In this respect, the tendency toward higher ERBB2 mRNA expression in ACC of dogs is interesting. ERBB2 (also known as HER2) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that lacks a ligand‐binding domain, and functions by heterodimerization with the other EGF receptors. Aberrant ERBB2 activation, for instance because of receptor overexpression, results in activation of the PI3K pathway, growth stimulation and tumorigenesis in different tumor types, of which ERBB2‐positive breast cancer is the most prominent example.11, 42 Different drugs targeting ERBB2 have been approved for clinical use in cancer treatment, including antibodies that inhibit heterodimerization (trastuzumab and pertuzumab43, 44) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors that affect both EGFR (ie, ERBB1) and ERBB2 activity (lapatinib and afatinib45, 46). Recent studies suggest that simultaneously targeting EGFR and ERBB2 further increases antitumor activity.11 Based on the higher expression of ERBB2, this receptor might be a promising new therapeutic target in dogs with ACC, either singly or in combination with EGFR inhibition. Aside from therapeutic targets, we also aimed to investigate the pathway components for potential new prognostic markers. In this regard, aside from IGFBP5, SGK1, ID1 and ID2 also are worth mentioning. The relative mRNA expression of SGK1 was significantly lower in carcinomas. At first glance, this seems surprising, because SGK1 is activated by PI3K signaling only at the protein level, by phosphorylation.33 Recently, however, SGK1 microdeletions and low SGK1 mRNA expression have been reported in cortisol‐secreting ATs of humans, but not in nonsecreting or aldosterone‐secreting ATs.47, 48, 49 Low SGK1 protein expression was found to be an independent prognostic factor for shorter overall survival.48 Although this study did not identify significant differences in SGK1 mRNA expression between dogs with and without recurrent disease, low SGK1 expression in cortisol‐secreting carcinomas does suggest a functional role for SGK1. Additional studies involving SGK1 protein expression and overall survival analyses are needed to determine whether SGK1 expression might prove to be a prognostic marker in these tumors. In the group of dogs with recurrent disease, we did find an increase in both ID1 and ID2 expression. This observation is in accordance with studies reporting an association between high ID1 and ID2 expression and poor prognosis in several different tumor types in humans.50 Inhibitor of differentiation proteins are thought to keep cells in a poorly differentiated, proliferative state, and therefore a role for ID1 and 2 in the pathogenesis of malignant ATs in dogs appears likely. Based on our results, ID1 and 2 show promise as new prognostic markers for ACC in dogs. Future studies are needed to determine whether targeting IDs might also be feasible as a new therapeutic option.51, 52 In conclusion, our results suggest the presence of PI3K activation in cortisol‐secreting ACC in dogs, but not in adenomas. In contrast to 1 of the most prominent features of ACC in humans, no significant alterations in IGF‐II or IGFR1 expression were detected. Therefore, our results suggest that inhibition of IGF signaling is not likely to prove successful in dogs with ATs. However, we did find higher expression of ERBB2, providing a preclinical rationale for studying the potential of ERBB2 inhibition, as used in ERBB2‐positive breast cancer, in dogs with ACC. Finally, the lower expression of SGK1 in carcinomas and the higher expression of IGFBP5, ID1, and ID2 in ATs with early recurrence may represent an important step in the search for prognostic markers for cortisol‐secreting ACC in dogs.
  51 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Gene expression profiling of human adrenocortical tumors using complementary deoxyribonucleic Acid microarrays identifies several candidate genes as markers of malignancy.

Authors:  Florence de Fraipont; Michelle El Atifi; Nadia Cherradi; Gwennaelle Le Moigne; Geneviève Defaye; Rémi Houlgatte; Jérôme Bertherat; Xavier Bertagna; Pierre-François Plouin; Eric Baudin; François Berger; Christine Gicquel; Olivier Chabre; Jean-Jacques Feige
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Insulin-like growth factor receptors in normal and tumorous adult human adrenocortical glands.

Authors:  M M Weber; C J Auernhammer; W Kiess; D Engelhardt
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 4.  PI3K and mTOR signaling pathways in cancer: new data on targeted therapies.

Authors:  Lise Willems; Jerome Tamburini; Nicolas Chapuis; Catherine Lacombe; Patrick Mayeux; Didier Bouscary
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Preclinical targeting of the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor in adrenocortical carcinoma.

Authors:  Ferdous M Barlaskar; Aaron C Spalding; Joanne H Heaton; Rork Kuick; Alex C Kim; Dafydd G Thomas; Thomas J Giordano; Edgar Ben-Josef; Gary D Hammer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Results of adrenalectomy in 36 dogs with hyperadrenocorticism caused by adreno-cortical tumour.

Authors:  F J van Sluijs; B E Sjollema; G Voorhout; T S van den Ingh; A Rijnberk
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.320

7.  The PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway mediates insulin-like growth factor 1-induced E-cadherin down-regulation and cell proliferation in ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Man-Tat Lau; Peter C K Leung
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 8.  ID proteins regulate diverse aspects of cancer progression and provide novel therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Radhika Nair; Wee Siang Teo; Vivek Mittal; Alexander Swarbrick
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 11.454

9.  FOXO transcription factors: key regulators of cell fate.

Authors:  E W-F Lam; R E Francis; M Petkovic
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.407

10.  The emerging role of the molecular marker p27 in the differential diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors.

Authors:  Sofia S Pereira; Tiago Morais; Madalena M Costa; Mariana P Monteiro; Duarte Pignatelli
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.335

View more
  2 in total

1.  Alterations of DNA methylation were associated with the rapid growth of cortisol-producing adrenocortical adenoma during pregnancy.

Authors:  Chuan Wang; Yujing Sun; Xiaofei Yin; Ruoqi Feng; Ruiying Feng; Mingyue Xu; Kai Liang; Ruxing Zhao; Gangli Gu; Xuewen Jiang; Peng Su; Xiaofang Zhang; Jinbo Liu
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 6.551

2.  Is there a role for the IGF system and epidermal growth factor (EGF) in the pathogenesis of adrenocortical adenomas? A preliminary case-control study.

Authors:  I Lazúrová; I Jochmanová; Š Sotak; I Špaková; M Mareková
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 1.881

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.