| Literature DB >> 25618747 |
Maeve Kelleher1, Audrey Dunn-Galvin1, Jonathan O'B Hourihane2, Deirdre Murray2, Linda E Campbell3, W H Irwin McLean3, Alan D Irvine4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Loss-of-function mutations in the skin barrier protein filaggrin (FLG) are a major risk for atopic dermatitis (AD). The pathogenic sequence of disturbances in skin barrier function before or during the early development of AD is not fully understood. A more detailed understanding of these events is needed to develop a clearer picture of disease pathogenesis. A robust, noninvasive test to identify babies at high risk of AD would be important in planning early intervention and/or prevention studies.Entities:
Keywords: Infant; TEWL; atopic dermatitis; biomarker; filaggrin; predictor; skin barrier
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25618747 PMCID: PMC4382348 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.12.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol ISSN: 0091-6749 Impact factor: 10.793
Baseline demographic characteristics
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Total enrolled | 1903 |
| Sex: male/female (%) | 50.4/49.6 |
| Birthweight (g), mean ± SD | 3489 ± 512 |
| Gestation (d), mean ± SD | 279.33 ± 10.77 |
FLG mutation rates
| Heterozygous rate (%) | Homozygous rate (%) | Total (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R501X | 4.0 (52 of 1300) | 0.23 (3 of 1300) | 4.23 (55 of 1300) |
| 2282Del4 | 3.62 (47 of 1300) | 0 | 3.6 (47 of 1300) |
| S3247X | 1.54 (20 of 1300) | 0.08 (1 of 1300) | 1.62 (21 of 1300) |
| R2447X | 1 (13 of 1300) | 0 | 1 (13 of 1300) |
| 10.15 (132 of 1300) | 0.31 (4 of 1300) | 10.46 (136 of 1300) |
TEWL by quartile at day 2 and month 2
| Birth TEWL | % of total sample | 2-mo TEWL test score value | % of total sample | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 7.3 | 10.9 | ||
| Median | 7.0 | 9.4 | ||
| Mode | 5.0 | 10.0 | ||
| SD | 3.3 | 7.9 | ||
| Minimum | 0.4 | 0.8 | ||
| Maximum | 34.0 | 92.3 | ||
| Percentiles | ||||
| 25 | 5.0 | 45 | 7.0 | 43 |
| 50 | 7.0 | 27 | 9.4 | 21 |
| 75 | 9.0 | 28 | 12.3 | 36 |
Relationship between FLG status and mean TEWL values
| Mean TEWL (gwater/m2/h) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1164 | 136 | |
| Birth | 7.3 ± 3.38 | 7.33 ± 3.62 | .91 |
| 2 mo | 10.7 ± 7.7 | 12.6 ± 10.1 | .04 |
| 6 mo | 10.42 ± 7.1 | 12.25 ± 6.53 | .007 |
| Δ Birth to 2 mo | 3.32 ± 8.1 | 5.44 ± 10.66 | .046 |
| Δ Birth to 6 mo | 2.93 ± 7.55 | 4.62 ± 7.11 | .03 |
| Δ 2 to 6 mo | 0.35 ± 10.11 | 0.75 ± 9.95 | .685 |
Univariate table
| Variable | OR | CIs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEWL birth percentiles | |||
| 25th (5.0 gwater/m2/h) | — | ||
| 50th (7.0 gwater/m2/h) | 1.9 | 1.27-2.86 | .002 |
| 75th (9.0 gwater/m2/h) | 1.6 | 1.10-2.53 | .03 |
| TEWL 2-mo percentiles | |||
| 25th (7.0 gwater/m2/h) | — | ||
| 50th (9.4 gwater/m2/h) | 1.4 | 0.95-1.95 | .9 |
| 75th (12.3 gwater/m2/h) | 3.1 | 2.21-4.22 | .0001 |
| Parental atopy | |||
| None | — | ||
| One (yes) | 1.4 | 1.03-2.01 | .03 |
| Both (yes) | 2.5 | 1.67-3.66 | .0001 |
| Visible rash at 2 mo (yes) | 2.7 | 1.88-4.1 | .001 |
| 2.9 | 1.94-4.45 | .0001 | |
| Use of emollient | 1.1 | 0.6-2.4 | .1 |
| Baseline 1 vs 2 | 1.1 | 0.9-1.53 | .3 |
| Birthweight | 1.01 | 1.0-1.2 | .4 |
| Sex | 0.91 | 0.7-1.2 | .4 |
LR model for factors at birth influencing AD at 12 months
| Predictor variable at birth | OR; CI ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Parental atopy | |||
| None | — | — | — |
| One (yes) | 10.2; 1.4-11.8 (.05) | 1.7; 0.5-4.8 (.2) | 11.5; 0.3-5.6 (.1) |
| Both (yes) | 13.7; 1.0-25.4 (.05) | 9.0; 4.4-20.4 (.001) | 13.4; 1.2-14.0 (.1) |
| No | — | — | — |
| Yes | 8.6; 1.1-24.7 (.02) | — | 10.2; 1.2-18.5 (.3) |
| TEWL birth percentiles | |||
| 25th (5.0 gwater/m2/h) | — | — | — |
| 50th (7.0 gwater/m2/h) | — | 3.2; 0.9-15.0 (.07) | 1.9; 0.3-17.7 (.9) |
| 75th (9.0 gwater/m2/h) | — | 7.1; 1.8-12.9 (.001) | 6.9; 0.6-34.3 (.1) |
| Adjusted for | |||
| Use of emollient (yes) | 0.8; 0.3-2.5 (.8) | 0.8; 0.3-2.0 (.6) | 0.7; 0.2-2.2 (.7) |
| Sex (male) | 0.9; 0.3-4.0 (.7) | 0.8; 0.3-1.9 (.6) | 0.9; 0.3-2.5 (.8) |
| Birthweight | 1.0; 0.9-1.1 (.5) | 1.0; 0.9-1.1 (.5) | 1.0; 0.9-1.1 (.5) |
| Visible itchy rash | 1.3; 0.3-5.9 (.7) | 2.1; 0.7-6.3 (.2) | 0.7; 0.2-3.2 (.6) |
| Baseline 1 vs 2 | 2.8; 0.7-11.5 (.2) | 2.3; 0.6-8.1 (.2) | 3.1; 0.7-13.2 (.2) |
| Model χ2 statistic for overall model fit | 18.5 (.05) | 14.7 (.04) | 16.3 (.05) |
| AUC | 0.8; 0.7-0.9 (.01) | 0.8; 0.7-0.9 (.01) | 0.83; 0.7-0.9 (.01) |
Controlling for “use of emollient before test reading,” “visible itchy rash at 2 months,” “infant sex,” and “infant birthweight.”
LR model for factors at 2 months influencing AD at 12 months
| Predictor variable at birth | OR; CI ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Parental atopy | |||
| None | — | — | — |
| One (yes) | 1.4; 0.4-2.7 (.6) | 1.7; 0.5-4.8 (.2) | 1.5; 0.3-5.6 (.1) |
| Both (yes) | 2.7; 1.3-4.1 (.01) | 9.0; 4.4-20.4 (.001) | 6.5; 1.2-14.0 (.01) |
| No | — | — | — |
| Yes | 3.1; 2.0-4.9 (.02) | — | 2.9; 0.4-19.5 (.28) |
| TEWL 2-mo percentiles | |||
| 25th (7.0 gwater/m2/h) | — | — | — |
| 50th (9.4 gwater/m2/h) | — | 1.1; 0.3-3.8 (.9) | 1.5; 0.3-4.1 (.9) |
| 75th (12.3 gwater/m2/h) | — | 5.6; 1.8-12.9 (.001) | 7.9; 1.7-25.0 (.01) |
| Adjusted for | |||
| Use of emollient (yes) | 1.1; 0.3-3.5 (.8) | 1.2; 0.4-3.1 (.7) | 0.5; 0.5-6.1 (.3) |
| Sex (male) | 0.9; 0.3-2.4 (.7) | 0.9; 0.3-2.1 (.6) | 0.9; 0.8-1.1 (.8) |
| Birthweight | 1.0; 0.9-1.0 (.3) | 1.0; 0.9-1.0 (.4) | 0.9; 0.8-1.0 (.3) |
| Visible itchy rash | 1.3; 2.1-5.3 (.7) | 0.7; 0.2-2.4 (.6) | 1.6; 0.3-8.2 (.6) |
| Baseline 1 vs 2 | 2.8; 0.7-11.5 (.2) | 1.8; 0.5-6.5 (.4) | 2.6; 0.5-11.6 (.2) |
| Model χ2 statistic for overall model fit | 64.0 (.04) | 34.2 (.005) | 26.3 (.01) |
| AUC | 0.66 (.01) | 0.82 (.01) | 0.84 (.01) |
Controlling for “use of emollient before test reading,” “visible itchy rash at 2 months,” “infant sex,” and “infant birthweight.”