Guan-Yang Song1, Lei Hong1, Hui Zhang1, Jin Zhang1, Yue Li1, Hua Feng2. 1. Sports Medicine Service, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31, Xin Jie Kou East Street, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100035, China. 2. Sports Medicine Service, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31, Xin Jie Kou East Street, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100035, China. fenghua20080617@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Iatrogenic medial patellar instability (IMPI) is a disabling but easily missed condition that is most often seen as a late complication of lateral retinacular release (LRR) procedures. The purposes of this study were (1) to summarize the available diagnostic methods and (2) to explore the contributing factors of IMPI following LRR procedures. METHODS: The MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies including diagnosed IMPI cases following LRR procedures. All patients were first divided into IMPI group and non-IMPI group based on the diagnostic methods of IMPI collected from studies. Univariate analysis was performed by comparing the two groups with regard to individual patient data (age at initial LRR, gender) and surgical details (type, releasing scope, combined surgeries and indication) of LRR procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to identify independent contributing factors for IMPI and to calculate odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Eight studies with 274 patients (300 knees) were finally included. Of those, 161 patients (171 knees, 57.0 %) had IMPI and 113 patients (129 knees, 43.0 %) had no IMPI. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between both groups for releasing scope (P 1 < 0.001) and indication of LRR procedures (P 2 < 0.001), with releasing lateral retinaculum (LR) + vastus lateralis (VL) tendon and absence of tight LR during the initial LRR procedures being more common in patients with IMPI. The independent contributing factors for IMPI identified in the multivariate logistic regression analysis were releasing LR + VL (OR1 = 16.49) and absence of tight LR (OR2 = 14.37). CONCLUSIONS: The IMPI was more common in patient with an over-released LRR and patient who was absent of tight LR during the initial LRR procedures. Aggressive surgical corrections and inappropriate indications of initial LRR were two contributing factors for the late complications of IMPI. This study suggests that the IMPI may occur as a major complication of LRR, especially when the VL tendon is extensively released or when there is no confirmative clinical evidence of a tight LR preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
PURPOSE: Iatrogenic medial patellar instability (IMPI) is a disabling but easily missed condition that is most often seen as a late complication of lateral retinacular release (LRR) procedures. The purposes of this study were (1) to summarize the available diagnostic methods and (2) to explore the contributing factors of IMPI following LRR procedures. METHODS: The MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies including diagnosed IMPI cases following LRR procedures. All patients were first divided into IMPI group and non-IMPI group based on the diagnostic methods of IMPI collected from studies. Univariate analysis was performed by comparing the two groups with regard to individual patient data (age at initial LRR, gender) and surgical details (type, releasing scope, combined surgeries and indication) of LRR procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to identify independent contributing factors for IMPI and to calculate odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Eight studies with 274 patients (300 knees) were finally included. Of those, 161 patients (171 knees, 57.0 %) had IMPI and 113 patients (129 knees, 43.0 %) had no IMPI. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between both groups for releasing scope (P 1 < 0.001) and indication of LRR procedures (P 2 < 0.001), with releasing lateral retinaculum (LR) + vastus lateralis (VL) tendon and absence of tight LR during the initial LRR procedures being more common in patients with IMPI. The independent contributing factors for IMPI identified in the multivariate logistic regression analysis were releasing LR + VL (OR1 = 16.49) and absence of tight LR (OR2 = 14.37). CONCLUSIONS: The IMPI was more common in patient with an over-released LRR and patient who was absent of tight LR during the initial LRR procedures. Aggressive surgical corrections and inappropriate indications of initial LRR were two contributing factors for the late complications of IMPI. This study suggests that the IMPI may occur as a major complication of LRR, especially when the VL tendon is extensively released or when there is no confirmative clinical evidence of a tight LR preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Authors: Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso; Erik Montesinos-Berry; Joan Carles Monllau; Alan C Merchant Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Mario Tartarone; Alessandro Patricola; Elizabeth W Paxton; Donald C Fithian Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Daniel K Schneider; Brian Grawe; Robert A Magnussen; Adrick Ceasar; Shital N Parikh; Eric J Wall; Angelo J Colosimo; Christopher C Kaeding; Gregory D Myer Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Maximilian Petri; Max Ettinger; Timo Stuebig; Stephan Brand; Christian Krettek; Michael Jagodzinski; Mohamed Omar Journal: Arch Trauma Res Date: 2015-09-01
Authors: Jourdan M Cancienne; David R Christian; Michael L Redondo; Hailey P Huddleston; Elizbeth F Shewman; Jack Farr; Brian J Cole; Adam B Yanke Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2019-12-19