Literature DB >> 25618066

Audio-visual speech scene analysis: characterization of the dynamics of unbinding and rebinding the McGurk effect.

Olha Nahorna1, Frédéric Berthommier1, Jean-Luc Schwartz1.   

Abstract

While audiovisual interactions in speech perception have long been considered as automatic, recent data suggest that this is not the case. In a previous study, Nahorna et al. [(2012). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 1061-1077] showed that the McGurk effect is reduced by a previous incoherent audiovisual context. This was interpreted as showing the existence of an audiovisual binding stage controlling the fusion process. Incoherence would produce unbinding and decrease the weight of the visual input in fusion. The present paper explores the audiovisual binding system to characterize its dynamics. A first experiment assesses the dynamics of unbinding, and shows that it is rapid: An incoherent context less than 0.5 s long (typically one syllable) suffices to produce a maximal reduction in the McGurk effect. A second experiment tests the rebinding process, by presenting a short period of either coherent material or silence after the incoherent unbinding context. Coherence provides rebinding, with a recovery of the McGurk effect, while silence provides no rebinding and hence freezes the unbinding process. These experiments are interpreted in the framework of an audiovisual speech scene analysis process assessing the perceptual organization of an audiovisual speech input before decision takes place at a higher processing stage.

Year:  2015        PMID: 25618066     DOI: 10.1121/1.4904536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  A simple and efficient method to enhance audiovisual binding tendencies.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; David R Wozny; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  Assessing the Role of the 'Unity Assumption' on Multisensory Integration: A Review.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

3.  What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Maryam Hedayati; Annie Zanger; Sasha Mayn; Lucia Ray; Naseem Dillman-Hasso; Julia F Strand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Auditory and Visual Motion Processing and Integration in the Primate Cerebral Cortex.

Authors:  Tristan A Chaplin; Marcello G P Rosa; Leo L Lui
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  A causal inference explanation for enhancement of multisensory integration by co-articulation.

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Kristen B Smith; Marcelo Salinas; Jacqunae Mays; Lin L Zhu; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The neural dynamics of hierarchical Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception.

Authors:  Tim Rohe; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Repeated exposure to either consistently spatiotemporally congruent or consistently incongruent audiovisual stimuli modulates the audiovisual common-cause prior.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Michael S Landy; Fangfang Hong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 8.  Defining Auditory-Visual Objects: Behavioral Tests and Physiological Mechanisms.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Ross K Maddox; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Emergence of β and γ networks following multisensory training.

Authors:  Daria La Rocca; Philippe Ciuciu; Denis-Alexander Engemann; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.