| Literature DB >> 25617855 |
Suzhen Cao1, Xiaoli Duan2, Xiuge Zhao3, Beibei Wang3, Jin Ma3, Delong Fan4, Chengye Sun5, Bin He6, Fusheng Wei7, Guibin Jiang6.
Abstract
As a highly toxic heavy metal, the pollution and exposure risks of lead are of widespread concern for human health. However, the collection of blood samples for use as an indicator of lead pollution is not always feasible in most cohort or longitudinal studies, especially those involving children health. To evaluate the potential use of urinary lead as an indicator of exposure levels and source apportionment, accompanying with environmental media samples, lead concentrations and isotopic measurements (expressed as (207)Pb/(206)Pb, (208)Pb/(206)Pb and (204)Pb/(206)Pb) were investigated and compared between blood and urine from children living in the vicinities of a typical coking plant and lead-acid battery factory. The results showed urinary lead might not be a preferable proxy for estimating blood lead levels. Fortunately, urinary lead isotopic measurements could be used as an alternative for identifying the sources of children's lead exposure, which coincided well with the blood lead isotope ratio analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Blood lead; Exposure; Isotopic ratios; Pollution source; Urinary lead
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25617855 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Pollut ISSN: 0269-7491 Impact factor: 8.071