Keith Hawton1, Helen Bergen2, Jayne Cooper3, Pauline Turnbull3, Keith Waters4, Jennifer Ness4, Nav Kapur3. 1. Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: keith.hawton@psych.ox.ac.uk. 2. Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK. 3. Centre for Suicide Prevention, Centre for Mental Health and Risk, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK. 4. Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-harm is a key risk factor for suicide and it is important to have contemporary information on the extent of risk. METHODS: Mortality follow-up to 2012 of 40,346 self-harm patients identified in the three centres of the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England between 2000 and 2010. RESULTS: Nineteen per cent of deaths during the study period (N=2704) were by suicide, which occurred in 1.6% of patients (2.6% of males and 0.9% of females), during which time the risk was 49 times greater than the general population risk. Overall, 0.5% of individuals died by suicide in the first year, including 0.82% of males and 0.27% of females. While the absolute risk of suicide was greater in males, the risk relative to that in the general population was higher in females. Risk of suicide increased with age. While self-poisoning had been the most frequent method of self-harm, hanging was the most common method of subsequent suicide, particularly in males. The number of suicides was probably a considerable underestimate as there were also a large number of deaths recorded as accidents, the majority of which were poisonings, these often involving psychotropic drugs. LIMITATIONS: The study was focussed entirely on hospital-presenting self-harm. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underline the importance of prevention initiatives focused on the self-harm population, especially during the initial months following an episode of self-harm. Estimates using suicide and open verdicts may underestimate the true risk of suicide following self-harm; inclusion of accidental poisonings may be warranted in future risk estimates.
BACKGROUND: Self-harm is a key risk factor for suicide and it is important to have contemporary information on the extent of risk. METHODS: Mortality follow-up to 2012 of 40,346 self-harm patients identified in the three centres of the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England between 2000 and 2010. RESULTS: Nineteen per cent of deaths during the study period (N=2704) were by suicide, which occurred in 1.6% of patients (2.6% of males and 0.9% of females), during which time the risk was 49 times greater than the general population risk. Overall, 0.5% of individuals died by suicide in the first year, including 0.82% of males and 0.27% of females. While the absolute risk of suicide was greater in males, the risk relative to that in the general population was higher in females. Risk of suicide increased with age. While self-poisoning had been the most frequent method of self-harm, hanging was the most common method of subsequent suicide, particularly in males. The number of suicides was probably a considerable underestimate as there were also a large number of deaths recorded as accidents, the majority of which were poisonings, these often involving psychotropic drugs. LIMITATIONS: The study was focussed entirely on hospital-presenting self-harm. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underline the importance of prevention initiatives focused on the self-harm population, especially during the initial months following an episode of self-harm. Estimates using suicide and open verdicts may underestimate the true risk of suicide following self-harm; inclusion of accidental poisonings may be warranted in future risk estimates.
Authors: Jeffrey A Bridge; Mark Olfson; Jeffrey M Caterino; Sara Wiesel Cullen; Amaya Diana; Martin Frankel; Steven C Marcus Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Julian Koenig; Romuald Brunner; Gloria Fischer-Waldschmidt; Peter Parzer; Paul L Plener; JiYeon Park; Camilla Wasserman; Vladimir Carli; Christina W Hoven; Marco Sarchiapone; Danuta Wasserman; Franz Resch; Michael Kaess Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Paul L Plener; Michael Kaess; Christian Schmahl; Stefan Pollak; Jörg M Fegert; Rebecca C Brown Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: William Gardner; Kathleen Pajer; Paula Cloutier; Lisa Currie; Ian Colman; Roger Zemek; Simon Hatcher; Isac Lima; Mario Cappelli Journal: CMAJ Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Mark Olfson; Carlos Blanco; Melanie Wall; Shang-Min Liu; Tulshi D Saha; Roger P Pickering; Bridget F Grant Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Caroline Daly; Eve Griffin; Darren M Ashcroft; Roger T Webb; Ivan J Perry; Ella Arensman Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Lindsay A Bornheimer; Kaipeng Wang; Anao Zhang; Juliann Li; Elise E Trim; Mark Ilgen; Cheryl A King Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Jamie Kammer; Mahfuza Rahman; Molly Finnerty; Deborah Layman; Katrina Vega; Hanga Galfalvy; Christa Labouliere; Gregory K Brown; Kelly Green; Anni Cummings; Prabu Vasan; Barbara Stanley Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 1.505