Literature DB >> 25617604

Letter to the Editor in response to "publication performance of women compared to men in German cardiology" by Boehm et al. (2014).

Constance G Weismann1, Eve R Colson2, Eugene D Shapiro2.   

Abstract

Based on their review of abstracts submitted to the German Cardiac Society, Boehm et al. (2014) report better success of female vs male cardiologists publishing in journals with an impact factor ≥5. However, only 25% of conference abstracts were submitted by women, perhaps suggesting a paucity of women in academic cardiology. In this 'letter to the editor' we review gender statistics in the medical field using Germany and the US as examples. While women are well represented in early career stages, only fewfull professors are women. This reflects a wasted opportunity to benefit from the best of both genders. Recent gender research has shown that subtle gender bias may play a role. To change the gender statistics in academic medicine a multifaceted approach is necessary. This will ultimately lead to a more equal representation of women in senior roles, and bring science, medical care, and leadership to a new level.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiology; Career; Gender bias; Promotion; Women in medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25617604     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  1 in total

1.  An index to characterize female career promotion in academic medicine.

Authors:  Dörthe Brüggmann; David A Groneberg
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.646

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.