Literature DB >> 25617559

Nutritional and metabolic status of breast cancer women.

Tatiana Bering1, Sílvia Fernandes Maurício1, Jacqueline Braga da Silva1, Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The nutritional and metabolic status have been related to cancer risk factors as well as to cancer treatment morbimortality. Thus, its assessment is important for developing strategies for the promotion, maintenance and / or recovery of nutritional status and cancer outcome.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Several different methods for nutritional assessment in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy were used, including subjective global assessment (SGA), body mass index (BMI), triceps skinfold (TSF), mid-arm circumference (MAC), adductor pollicis muscle thickness (APMT), hand grip strength (HGS) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) was also evaluated. The occurrence of complications during cancer treatment versus the nutritional status was assessed.
RESULTS: We followed 78 women with a mean age of 53.2 } 11.6 years. Most patients were considered well nourished (80.8%). Excessive body fat mass by BIA and MetS were found in 80,8 % and 41.9% of the patients respectively. There were significant differences in BMI, TSF, WC (waist circumference) and % fat mass between patients with and without MetS. Most patients experienced complications during cancer treatment, but there was no association with nutritional or metabolic status.
CONCLUSION: In breast cancer women undergoing adjuvant therapy, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was high and, on the contrary, undernutrition was low. There were no short-term effects of metabolic syndrome or undernutrition on clinical outcomes. Copyright AULA MEDICA EDICIONES 2014. Published by AULA MEDICA. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25617559     DOI: 10.3305/nh.2015.31.2.8056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Hosp        ISSN: 0212-1611            Impact factor:   1.057


  6 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional assessment in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Fernando Gomes Romeiro; Laís Augusti
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-12-28

2.  Subjective taste and smell changes in treatment-naive people with solid tumours.

Authors:  L Spotten; C Corish; C Lorton; P Ui Dhuibhir; N O'Donoghue; B O'Connor; M Cunningham; N El Beltagi; C Gillham; D Walsh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  ADDUCTOR POLLICIS MUSCLE THICKNESS AND PREDICTION OF POSTOPERATIVE MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH STOMACH CANCER.

Authors:  Aline Kirjner Poziomyck; Oly Campos Corleta; Leandro Totti Cavazzola; Antonio Carlos Weston; Edson Braga Lameu; Luisa Jussara Coelho; Luis Fernando Moreira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-03-01

4.  Assessment of the awareness and knowledge of cancer survivors regarding the components of metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Yeji Seo; Ji-Su Kim; Eun-Shim Park; Eunjung Ryu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Bioelectrical Phase Angle in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Delia Morlino; Iolanda Cioffi; Maurizio Marra; Olivia Di Vincenzo; Luca Scalfi; Fabrizio Pasanisi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Effects of Perioperative Oral Nutrition Supplementation in Malaysian Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery for Breast and Colorectal Cancers-A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ting Xuan Wong; Wei Xiang Wong; Seong Ting Chen; Shu Hwa Ong; Sangeetha Shyam; Nurzarina Ahmed; Khairul Hazim Hamdan; Raflis Ruzairee Awang; Mohd Razali Ibrahim; Kandasami Palayan; Winnie Siew Swee Chee
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.