Literature DB >> 25617464

The role of egg-nest contrast in the rejection of brood parasitic eggs.

Zachary Aidala1, Rebecca Croston2, Jessica Schwartz3, Lainga Tong3, Mark E Hauber4.   

Abstract

Hosts of avian brood parasites can avoid the reproductive costs of raising genetically unrelated offspring by rejecting parasitic eggs. The perceptual cues and controls mediating parasitic egg discrimination and ejection are well studied: hosts are thought to use differences in egg color, brightness, maculation, size and shape to discriminate between their own and foreign eggs. Most theories of brood parasitism implicitly assume that the primary criteria to which hosts attend when discriminating eggs are differences between the eggs themselves. However, this assumption is confounded by the degree to which chromatic and achromatic characteristics of the nest lining co-vary with egg coloration, so that egg-nest contrast per se might be the recognition cue driving parasitic egg detection. Here, we systematically tested whether and how egg-nest contrast itself contributes to foreign egg discrimination. In an artificial parasitism experiment, we independently manipulated egg color and nest lining color of the egg-ejector American robin (Turdus migratorius), a host of the obligate brood parasitic brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). We hypothesized that the degree of contrast between foreign eggs and the nest background would affect host egg rejection behavior. We predicted that experimentally decreasing egg-nest chromatic and achromatic contrast (i.e. rendering parasitic eggs more cryptic against the nest lining) would decrease rejection rates, while increasing egg-nest contrast would increase rejection rates. In contrast to our predictions, egg-nest contrast was not a significant predictor of egg ejection patterns. Instead, egg color significantly predicted responses to parasitism. We conclude that egg-egg differences are the primary drivers of egg rejection in this system. Future studies should test for the effects of egg-nest contrast per se in predicting parasitic egg recognition in other host-parasite systems, including those hosts building enclosed nests and those parasites laying cryptic eggs, as an alternative to hypothesized effects of egg-egg contrast.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brood parasitism; Egg rejection; Visual ecology; Visual modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25617464     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.108449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

1.  A test of the nest sanitation hypothesis for the evolution of foreign egg rejection in an avian brood parasite rejecter host species.

Authors:  Alec B Luro; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-03-01

2.  Avian egg and nestling detection in the wild: should we rely on visual models or behavioural experiments?

Authors:  Jesús M Avilés
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Does contrast between eggshell ground and spot coloration affect egg rejection?

Authors:  Miri Dainson; Mark E Hauber; Analía V López; Tomáš Grim; Daniel Hanley
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-06-22

4.  Nest sanitation as an effective defence against brood parasitism.

Authors:  Michal Šulc; Anna E Hughes; Lisandrina Mari; Jolyon Troscianko; Oldřich Tomášek; Tomáš Albrecht; Václav Jelínek
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.899

5.  Which egg features predict egg rejection responses in American robins? Replicating Rothstein's (1982) study.

Authors:  Alec B Luro; Branislav Igic; Rebecca Croston; Analía V López; Matthew D Shawkey; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.