Literature DB >> 25617461

Vocalisations of the bigeye Pempheris adspersa: characteristics, source level and active space.

Craig A Radford1, Shahriman Ghazali2, Andrew G Jeffs3, John C Montgomery3.   

Abstract

Fish sounds are an important biological component of the underwater soundscape. Understanding species-specific sounds and their associated behaviour is critical for determining how animals use the biological component of the soundscape. Using both field and laboratory experiments, we describe the sound production of a nocturnal planktivore, Pempheris adspersa (New Zealand bigeye), and provide calculations for the potential effective distance of the sound for intraspecific communication. Bigeye vocalisations recorded in the field were confirmed as such by tank recordings. They can be described as popping sounds, with individual pops of short duration (7.9±0.3 ms) and a peak frequency of 405±12 Hz. Sound production varied during a 24 h period, with peak vocalisation activity occurring during the night, when the fish are most active. The source level of the bigeye vocalisation was 115.8±0.2 dB re. 1 µPa at 1 m, which is relatively quiet compared with other soniferous fish. Effective calling range, or active space, depended on both season and lunar phase, with a maximum calling distance of 31.6 m and a minimum of 0.6 m. The bigeyes' nocturnal behaviour, characteristics of their vocalisation, source level and the spatial scale of its active space reported in the current study demonstrate the potential for fish vocalisations to function effectively as contact calls for maintaining school cohesion in darkness.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active space; Ambient sound; Contact call; Fish; Vocalisations

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25617461     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.115295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Coral reef soundscapes may not be detectable far from the reef.

Authors:  Maxwell B Kaplan; T Aran Mooney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Evidence for contact calls in fish: conspecific vocalisations and ambient soundscape influence group cohesion in a nocturnal species.

Authors:  L van Oosterom; J C Montgomery; A G Jeffs; C A Radford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Patterns of biophonic periodicity on coral reefs in the Great Barrier Reef.

Authors:  Jamie N McWilliam; Robert D McCauley; Christine Erbe; Miles J G Parsons
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Characterization of the acoustic community of vocal fishes in the Azores.

Authors:  Rita Carriço; Mónica A Silva; Gui M Menezes; Paulo J Fonseca; Maria Clara P Amorim
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Exploring spatial and temporal trends in the soundscape of an ecologically significant embayment.

Authors:  R L Putland; R Constantine; C A Radford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Underwater sound from vessel traffic reduces the effective communication range in Atlantic cod and haddock.

Authors:  Jenni A Stanley; Sofie M Van Parijs; Leila T Hatch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.