April R Levin1, Nathan A Fox2, Charles H Zeanah3, Charles A Nelson4. 1. Boston Children's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston. Electronic address: April.Levin@childrens.harvard.edu. 2. University of Maryland, College Park. 3. Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans. 4. Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience at Boston Children's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, and the Harvard Center on the Developing Child, Cambridge, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of difficulties with social communication and restricted/repetitive behaviors as well as the rate of autism in children institutionalized in early infancy and to assess the impact of a foster care intervention on ameliorating this risk. METHOD:Children abandoned at birth and raised in institutions in Bucharest, Romania were randomly assigned to a care-as-usual group (institutional care, CAUG), or placed in family-centered foster care (FCG) as part of the Bucharest Early Intervention Project (BEIP). At approximately 10 years of age, the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) was administered to caregivers of children in both groups as well as to parents of a typically developing community sample (Never-Institutionalized group [NIG]) residing in Bucharest, Romania. Children scoring ≥12 on the SCQ underwent clinical evaluation for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). RESULTS: Caregivers of children with a history of institutionalization reported that these children had significantly more deviant behavior than never-institutionalized children on all subdomains of the SCQ (all p < 0.001). Children in the FCG had significantly lower scores on the SCQ than children in the CAUG (p < .001), particularly in the reciprocal social interaction domain, indicating that the intervention reduced problems in social communication. Three of 60 CAUG children, 2 of 57 FCG children, and none of the NIG children received a formal ASD diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Early institutional rearing was associated with an increased risk of social communication difficulties and ASD. A family-centered foster care intervention improved social communication skills.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of difficulties with social communication and restricted/repetitive behaviors as well as the rate of autism in children institutionalized in early infancy and to assess the impact of a foster care intervention on ameliorating this risk. METHOD:Children abandoned at birth and raised in institutions in Bucharest, Romania were randomly assigned to a care-as-usual group (institutional care, CAUG), or placed in family-centered foster care (FCG) as part of the Bucharest Early Intervention Project (BEIP). At approximately 10 years of age, the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) was administered to caregivers of children in both groups as well as to parents of a typically developing community sample (Never-Institutionalized group [NIG]) residing in Bucharest, Romania. Children scoring ≥12 on the SCQ underwent clinical evaluation for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). RESULTS: Caregivers of children with a history of institutionalization reported that these children had significantly more deviant behavior than never-institutionalized children on all subdomains of the SCQ (all p < 0.001). Children in the FCG had significantly lower scores on the SCQ than children in the CAUG (p < .001), particularly in the reciprocal social interaction domain, indicating that the intervention reduced problems in social communication. Three of 60 CAUG children, 2 of 57 FCGchildren, and none of the NIG children received a formal ASD diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Early institutional rearing was associated with an increased risk of social communication difficulties and ASD. A family-centered foster care intervention improved social communication skills.
Authors: Jennifer Windsor; Joann P Benigno; Christine A Wing; Patrick J Carroll; Sebastian F Koga; Charles A Nelson; Nathan A Fox; Charles H Zeanah Journal: Child Dev Date: 2011-06-16
Authors: Karen Bos; Charles H Zeanah; Nathan A Fox; Stacy S Drury; Katie A McLaughlin; Charles A Nelson Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Anna T Smyke; Charles H Zeanah; Mary Margaret Gleason; Stacy S Drury; Nathan A Fox; Charles A Nelson; Donald Guthrie Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Nathan A Fox; Alisa N Almas; Kathryn A Degnan; Charles A Nelson; Charles H Zeanah Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Alisa N Almas; Kathryn A Degnan; Anca Radulescu; Charles A Nelson; Charles H Zeanah; Nathan A Fox Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bernard F Fuemmeler; Pamela Behrman; Maija Taylor; Rebeccah Sokol; Emily Rothman; Lisette T Jacobson; Danielle Wischenka; Kenneth P Tercyak Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2016-09-09
Authors: Kathryn L Humphreys; Laurel Gabard-Durnam; Bonnie Goff; Eva H Telzer; Jessica Flannery; Dylan G Gee; Valentina Park; Steve S Lee; Nim Tottenham Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2019-10
Authors: Margaret A Sheridan; Katie A McLaughlin; Warren Winter; Nathan Fox; Charles Zeanah; Charles A Nelson Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 14.919