PURPOSE: Largazole is a potent class I-selective HDACi natural product isolated from the marine cyanobacteria Symploca sp. The purpose of this study was to test synthetic analogs of Largazole to identify potential scaffold structural modifications that would improve the drug-like properties of this clinically relevant natural product. METHODS: The impact of Largazole scaffold replacements on in vitro growth inhibition, cell cycle arrest, induction of apoptosis, pharmacokinetic properties, and in vivo activity using a xenograft model was investigated. RESULTS: In vitro studies in colon, lung, and pancreatic cancer cell lines showed that pyridyl-substituted Largazole analogs had low-nanomolar/high-picomolar antiproliferative activity, and induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at concentrations equivalent to or lower than the parent compound Largazole. Using IV bolus delivery at 5 mg/kg, two compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling on the peptide isostere analog of Largazole indicated improved pharmacokinetic parameters. In an A549 non-small cell lung carcinoma xenograft model using a dosage of 5 mg/kg administered intraperitoneally every other day, Largazole, Largazole thiol, and Largazole peptide isostere demonstrated tumor growth inhibition (TGI%) of 32, 44, and 66%, respectively. Largazole peptide isostere treatment was statistically superior to control (p = 0.002) and to Largazole (p = 0.006). Surprisingly, tumor growth inhibition was not observed with the potent pyridyl-based analogs. CONCLUSIONS: These results establish that replacing the depsipeptide linkage in Largazole with an amide may impart pharmacokinetic and therapeutic advantage and that alternative prodrug forms of Largazole are feasible.
PURPOSE:Largazole is a potent class I-selective HDACi natural product isolated from the marine cyanobacteria Symploca sp. The purpose of this study was to test synthetic analogs of Largazole to identify potential scaffold structural modifications that would improve the drug-like properties of this clinically relevant natural product. METHODS: The impact of Largazole scaffold replacements on in vitro growth inhibition, cell cycle arrest, induction of apoptosis, pharmacokinetic properties, and in vivo activity using a xenograft model was investigated. RESULTS: In vitro studies in colon, lung, and pancreatic cancer cell lines showed that pyridyl-substituted Largazole analogs had low-nanomolar/high-picomolar antiproliferative activity, and induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at concentrations equivalent to or lower than the parent compound Largazole. Using IV bolus delivery at 5 mg/kg, two compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling on the peptide isostere analog of Largazole indicated improved pharmacokinetic parameters. In an A549 non-small cell lung carcinoma xenograft model using a dosage of 5 mg/kg administered intraperitoneally every other day, Largazole, Largazole thiol, and Largazole peptide isostere demonstrated tumor growth inhibition (TGI%) of 32, 44, and 66%, respectively. Largazole peptide isostere treatment was statistically superior to control (p = 0.002) and to Largazole (p = 0.006). Surprisingly, tumor growth inhibition was not observed with the potent pyridyl-based analogs. CONCLUSIONS: These results establish that replacing the depsipeptide linkage in Largazole with an amide may impart pharmacokinetic and therapeutic advantage and that alternative prodrug forms of Largazole are feasible.
Authors: Hanae Benelkebir; Sabrina Marie; Annette L Hayden; Jason Lyle; Paul M Loadman; Simon J Crabb; Graham Packham; A Ganesan Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Yanxia Liu; Lilibeth A Salvador; Seongrim Byeon; Yongcheng Ying; Jason C Kwan; Brian K Law; Jiyong Hong; Hendrik Luesch Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Robert L Schlossman; Melissa Alsina; Donna M Weber; Steven E Coutre; Cristina Gasparetto; Sutapa Mukhopadhyay; Michael S Ondovik; Mahmudul Khan; Carole S Paley; Sagar Lonial Journal: Blood Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Mercedes Lobera; Kevin P Madauss; Denise T Pohlhaus; Quentin G Wright; Mark Trocha; Darby R Schmidt; Erkan Baloglu; Ryan P Trump; Martha S Head; Glenn A Hofmann; Monique Murray-Thompson; Benjamin Schwartz; Subhas Chakravorty; Zining Wu; Palwinder K Mander; Laurens Kruidenier; Robert A Reid; William Burkhart; Brandon J Turunen; James X Rong; Craig Wagner; Mary B Moyer; Carrow Wells; Xuan Hong; John T Moore; Jon D Williams; Dulce Soler; Shomir Ghosh; Michael A Nolan Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2013-03-24 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Thomas Beckers; Carmen Burkhardt; Heike Wieland; Petra Gimmnich; Thomas Ciossek; Thomas Maier; Karl Sanders Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2007-09-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Sukyung Woo; Erin R Gardner; Xiaohong Chen; Sandra B Ockers; Caitlin E Baum; Tristan M Sissung; Douglas K Price; Robin Frye; Richard L Piekarz; Susan E Bates; William D Figg Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marielle Fournel; Claire Bonfils; Yu Hou; Pu Theresa Yan; Marie-Claude Trachy-Bourget; Ann Kalita; Jianhong Liu; Ai-Hua Lu; Nancy Z Zhou; Marie-France Robert; Jeffrey Gillespie; James J Wang; Hélène Ste-Croix; Jubrail Rahil; Sylvain Lefebvre; Oscar Moradei; Daniel Delorme; A Robert Macleod; Jeffrey M Besterman; Zuomei Li Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Albert A Bowers; Thomas J Greshock; Nathan West; Guillermina Estiu; Stuart L Schreiber; Olaf Wiest; Robert M Williams; James E Bradner Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Dane J Clausen; William B Smith; Brandon E Haines; Olaf Wiest; James E Bradner; Robert M Williams Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Jehad Almaliti; Ayad A Al-Hamashi; Ahmed T Negmeldin; Christin L Hanigan; Lalith Perera; Mary Kay H Pflum; Robert A Casero; L M Viranga Tillekeratne Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Y Zhou; W Zeng; M Qi; Y Duan; J Su; S Zhao; W Zhong; M Gao; F Li; Y He; X Hu; X Xu; X Chen; C Peng; J Zhang Journal: Oncogenesis Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 7.485