Uwe Zeymer1, Hans-Christian Mochmann2, Bernd Mark3, Hans-Richard Arntz2, Holger Thiele4, Frank Diller5, Gilles Montalescot6, Ralf Zahn3. 1. Klinikum Ludwigshafen and Institut für Herzinfarkt für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Electronic address: zeymeru@klilu.de. 2. Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. 3. Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany. 4. Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany. 5. Institut für Herzinfartktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany. 6. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtriėre, INSERM UMRS 1166, Paris, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study compared the timing of onset of antiplatelet action after treatment with clopidogrel and prasugrel at first medical contact in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) scheduled for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). BACKGROUND: Little is known about the timing of onset of antiplatelet action after a pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) loading dose of clopidogrel or prasugrel in patients with STEMI. METHODS: This double-blind, prospective study randomized 62 patients with STEMI scheduled for PPCI in the ambulance or the emergency department to 60 mg prasugrel (n = 31) or 600 mgclopidogrel (n = 31). The primary endpoint was the platelet reactivity index (PRI) measured with the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein assay 2 h after intake of the study medication. Secondary endpoints were PRI after 4 h, TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) patency of the infarct-related artery before and after PCI, and clinical events until day 30. RESULTS: The PRI after 2 h (50.4 ± 32.7% vs. 66.3 ± 22.2%; p = 0.035) and after 4 h (39.1 ± 27.5% vs. 54.5 ± 49.3%; p = 0.038) were significantly lower with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel. In addition, the rate of patients with a PRI <50% tended to be higher with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel after 2 h (46.7% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.15) and after 4 h (63.0% vs. 38.9%; p = 0.06). There were no significant differences in TIMI 2/3 patency before PCI (39.2% vs. 31.0%; p = 0.43) and TIMI 3 patency after PCI (88.5% vs. 89.3%; p = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: The pre-PCI administration of prasugrel in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI was associated with a significant faster platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel. Therefore, prasugrel should be preferred to clopidogrel in this setting. (ETAMI-Study: Early Thienopyridine Treatment to Improve Primary PCI in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction; NCT01327534).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This study compared the timing of onset of antiplatelet action after treatment with clopidogrel and prasugrel at first medical contact in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) scheduled for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). BACKGROUND: Little is known about the timing of onset of antiplatelet action after a pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) loading dose of clopidogrel or prasugrel in patients with STEMI. METHODS: This double-blind, prospective study randomized 62 patients with STEMI scheduled for PPCI in the ambulance or the emergency department to 60 mg prasugrel (n = 31) or 600 mg clopidogrel (n = 31). The primary endpoint was the platelet reactivity index (PRI) measured with the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein assay 2 h after intake of the study medication. Secondary endpoints were PRI after 4 h, TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) patency of the infarct-related artery before and after PCI, and clinical events until day 30. RESULTS: The PRI after 2 h (50.4 ± 32.7% vs. 66.3 ± 22.2%; p = 0.035) and after 4 h (39.1 ± 27.5% vs. 54.5 ± 49.3%; p = 0.038) were significantly lower with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel. In addition, the rate of patients with a PRI <50% tended to be higher with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel after 2 h (46.7% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.15) and after 4 h (63.0% vs. 38.9%; p = 0.06). There were no significant differences in TIMI 2/3 patency before PCI (39.2% vs. 31.0%; p = 0.43) and TIMI 3 patency after PCI (88.5% vs. 89.3%; p = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: The pre-PCI administration of prasugrel in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI was associated with a significant faster platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel. Therefore, prasugrel should be preferred to clopidogrel in this setting. (ETAMI-Study: Early Thienopyridine Treatment to Improve Primary PCI in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction; NCT01327534).
Authors: Dean J Kereiakes; Tim D Henry; Anthony N DeMaria; Ohad Bentur; Marilyn Carlson; Corinne Seng Yue; Linda H Martin; Jeff Midkiff; Michele Mueller; Terah Meek; Deborah Garza; C Michael Gibson; Barry S Coller Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 6.106