M L Schmidtke1, A Dinkel, J E Gschwend, K Herkommer. 1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient counseling by using the IIEF to assess erectile function (EF) before and after radical prostatectomy (RPX) is only possible under limited circumstances. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) could be used in addition to the IIEF for the assessment of EF and patient preference regarding counseling for their sex life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: EF was evaluated in 307 patients 3-60 months after RPX using the IIEF-EF and EHS. Questionnaires assessed sexual activity/intercourse as well as satisfaction with sex life irrespective of EF (10-point Likert scale). Patients were further asked concerning development of new sexual methods independent of erection firm enough for penetration and further wishes regarding counseling for their sex life. RESULTS: Of 272 patients, 82.0% underwent bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy, 30.5% (n=83; mean age: 68.1 years) had sexual intercourse and 41.9% (n=114) were sexually active. EH Scores 1-2 and 4 coincided with compatible IIEF-EF Scores 1-21, and ≥ 26, respectively. Of the patients with an EHS of 3, 55.9% had an IIEF-EF score that was notably lower. Of patients with sexual intercourse, 65.8% were satisfied with their sex life; 53.2% of sexually active patients were satisfied without sexual intercourse. Alternative methods were manual/oral stimulation, cuddling, and the use of vibrators. Patients request individually tailored, realistic counseling. CONCLUSION: The advantage of the EHS compared to the IIEF is that the erectile function can be assessed irrespective of sexual intercourse and sexual partner. Counseling should assist patients towards the attainment of a satisfying sex life-even without an erection.
BACKGROUND:Patient counseling by using the IIEF to assess erectile function (EF) before and after radical prostatectomy (RPX) is only possible under limited circumstances. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) could be used in addition to the IIEF for the assessment of EF and patient preference regarding counseling for their sex life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: EF was evaluated in 307 patients 3-60 months after RPX using the IIEF-EF and EHS. Questionnaires assessed sexual activity/intercourse as well as satisfaction with sex life irrespective of EF (10-point Likert scale). Patients were further asked concerning development of new sexual methods independent of erection firm enough for penetration and further wishes regarding counseling for their sex life. RESULTS: Of 272 patients, 82.0% underwent bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy, 30.5% (n=83; mean age: 68.1 years) had sexual intercourse and 41.9% (n=114) were sexually active. EH Scores 1-2 and 4 coincided with compatible IIEF-EF Scores 1-21, and ≥ 26, respectively. Of the patients with an EHS of 3, 55.9% had an IIEF-EF score that was notably lower. Of patients with sexual intercourse, 65.8% were satisfied with their sex life; 53.2% of sexually active patients were satisfied without sexual intercourse. Alternative methods were manual/oral stimulation, cuddling, and the use of vibrators. Patients request individually tailored, realistic counseling. CONCLUSION: The advantage of the EHS compared to the IIEF is that the erectile function can be assessed irrespective of sexual intercourse and sexual partner. Counseling should assist patients towards the attainment of a satisfying sex life-even without an erection.
Authors: Farhang Rabbani; Jeffrey Schiff; Michael Piecuch; Luis Herran Yunis; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; John P Mulhall Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Andrea Salonia; Andrea Gallina; Giuseppe Zanni; Alberto Briganti; Federico Dehò; Antonino Saccà; Nazareno Suardi; Luigi Barbieri; Giorgio Guazzoni; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Irwin Goldstein; John P Mulhall; Andrew G Bushmakin; Joseph C Cappelleri; Kyle Hvidsten; Tara Symonds Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: John P Mulhall; Irwin Goldstein; Andrew G Bushmakin; Joseph C Cappelleri; Kyle Hvidsten Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2007-09-21 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Alexander Müller; Marilyn Parker; Bedford W Waters; Robert C Flanigan; John P Mulhall Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2009-08-28 Impact factor: 3.802