Literature DB >> 25616718

Recruiting for values in healthcare: a preliminary review of the evidence.

Fiona Patterson1,2, Linda Prescott-Clements3, Lara Zibarras4, Helena Edwards5, Maire Kerrin5, Fran Cousans5.   

Abstract

Displaying compassion, benevolence and respect, and preserving the dignity of patients are important for any healthcare professional to ensure the provision of high quality care and patient outcomes. This paper presents a structured search and thematic review of the research evidence relating to values-based recruitment within healthcare. Several different databases, journals and government reports were searched to retrieve studies relating to values-based recruitment published between 1998 and 2013, both in healthcare settings and other occupational contexts. There is limited published research related to values-based recruitment directly, so the available theoretical context of values is explored alongside an analysis of the impact of value congruence. The implications for the design of selection methods to measure values is explored beyond the scope of the initial literature search. Research suggests some selection methods may be appropriate for values-based recruitment, such as situational judgment tests (SJTs), structured interviews and multiple-mini interviews (MMIs). Personality tests were also identified as having the potential to compliment other methods (e.g. structured interviews), as part of a values-based recruitment agenda. Methods including personal statements, references and unstructured/'traditional' interviews were identified as inappropriate for values-based recruitment. Practical implications are discussed in the context of values-based recruitment in the healthcare context. Theoretical implications of our findings imply that prosocial implicit trait policies, which could be measured by selection tools such as SJTs and MMIs, may be linked to individuals' values via the behaviours individuals consider to be effective in given situations. Further research is required to state this conclusively however, and methods for values-based recruitment represent an exciting and relatively unchartered territory for further research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare; Review; Selection; Values based recruitment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25616718     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-014-9579-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  5 in total

1.  The value of situational judgement tests for assessing non-academic attributes in dental selection.

Authors:  N Taylor; S Mehra; K Elley; F Patterson; F Cousans
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Personal statement versus psychological test as admission to the nursing degree: an evaluation.

Authors:  Marian Traynor; Colin Mc Neill; Audrey Roulston
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Socio-economic characteristics and career intentions of the WiSDOM health professional cohort in South Africa.

Authors:  Laetitia Charmaine Rispel; Prudence Ditlopo; Janine Anthea White; Duane Blaauw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Deanery placement and the Situational Judgement Test.

Authors:  Mycroft J Halliwell-Ewen; Charlotte Lee; Dipesh P Gopal
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-11-23

5.  Motivating provision of high quality care: it is not all about the money.

Authors:  Mylène Lagarde; Luis Huicho; Irene Papanicolas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-09-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.