Literature DB >> 25616714

Role of Rhipicephalus microplus cheliceral receptors in gustation and host differentiation.

Lorena Lopes Ferreira1, Sara Fernandes Soares2, Jaires Gomes de Oliveira Filho3, Thaynara Tatielly Oliveira4, Adalberto A Pérez de León5, Lígia Miranda Ferreira Borges6.   

Abstract

Rhipicephalus microplus is considered the most economically important ectoparasite of cattle worldwide. It is known that zebuine breeds of cattle are less susceptible to tick infestation than taurine breeds. Contact chemoreceptors in the cheliceral pit sensilla of ticks respond selectively to phagostimulant compounds, however their role in blood feeding relative to host susceptibility to infestation remains to be fully understood. We addressed this topic by conducting taste electrophysiology experiments with cheliceral pit sensilla preparations of R. microplus females. Solutions of five known ixodid tick phagostimulants were tested at different concentrations: sodium (NaCl), and potassium chloride (KCl) (10(-3)-10(-1)M); glucose (10(-4)-10(-1)M); adenosine triphosphate (ATP) (10(-6)-10(-2)M); and reduced l-glutathione (GSH) (10(-6)-10(-2)M). Serum samples from six susceptible animals of the Girolando breed (5/8 Bos indicus×3/8 B. taurus) and six resistant Nelore bovines (pure B. indicus) were also tested. A dose-dependent response of gustatory neurons associated with the chelicerae sensillum to NaCl, glucose, GSH, and ATP were observed. Responses by the cheliceral inner digit pit sensilla of R. microplus to KCl and glucose were also observed and they are reported here for the first time. In addition to an electrophysiological response to known phagostimulants, chemoreceptors in the chelicera of R. microplus responded differently to serum from cattle susceptible and resistant to infestation. The cheliceral pit neurons were more responsive to serum of R. microplus resistant bovines with a higher mean spike frequency (53.5±2spikess(-1)) than to serum samples from susceptible cattle (40.3±2spikess(-1)). The implications of chemosensation during tick blood feeding are discussed.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood-feeding; Cheliceral sensilla; Electrophysiology; Gustation; Host selection; Rhipicephalus microplus

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25616714     DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis        ISSN: 1877-959X            Impact factor:   3.744


  4 in total

1.  Integrated Metabolomics, Transcriptomics and Proteomics Identifies Metabolic Pathways Affected by Anaplasma phagocytophilum Infection in Tick Cells.

Authors:  Margarita Villar; Nieves Ayllón; Pilar Alberdi; Andrés Moreno; María Moreno; Raquel Tobes; Lourdes Mateos-Hernández; Sabine Weisheit; Lesley Bell-Sakyi; José de la Fuente
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 2.  Cattle Tick Rhipicephalus microplus-Host Interface: A Review of Resistant and Susceptible Host Responses.

Authors:  Ala E Tabor; Abid Ali; Gauhar Rehman; Gustavo Rocha Garcia; Amanda Fonseca Zangirolamo; Thiago Malardo; Nicholas N Jonsson
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 3.  Rhipicephalus Tick: A Contextual Review for Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Li Peng Tan; Ruhil Hayati Hamdan; Basripuzi Nurul Hayyan Hassan; Mohd Farhan Hanif Reduan; Ibrahim Abdul-Azeez Okene; Shih Keng Loong; Jing Jing Khoo; Ahmad Syazwan Samsuddin; Seng Hua Lee
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 4.  Microbiomes of Blood-Feeding Arthropods: Genes Coding for Essential Nutrients and Relation to Vector Fitness and Pathogenic Infections. A Review.

Authors:  Daniel E Sonenshine; Philip E Stewart
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-11-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.