Literature DB >> 25616458

Long-term outcomes in patients after epilepsy surgery failure.

Michal Ryzí1, Milan Brázdil2, Zdeněk Novák3, Jan Hemza4, Jan Chrastina5, Hana Ošlejšková6, Ivan Rektor7, Robert Kuba8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of patients who were classified as Engel IV one year after resective epilepsy surgery. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment options and to examine the reasons that the patients did not undergo resective reoperation.
METHODS: Our study was designed as a retrospective open-label investigation of the long-term outcomes of 34 patients (12% of all surgically treated patients) who were classified as Engel IV one year after epilepsy surgery.
RESULTS: At the last follow-up visit (average of 7.6 ± 4.2 years after surgery), 12 of the 34 examined patients (35.3%) were still classified as Engel IV; 22 of the 34 patients (64.7%) were improved (Engel I-III). Of the 34 patients, 8 (23.5%) achieved an excellent outcome, classified as Engel I, 3 patients (8.8%) were classified as Engel II, and 11 patients (32.4%) as Engel III. The seizure outcome in the patients classified as Engel I was achieved by resective reoperation in 4; by a change in antiepileptic medication in 3 patients; and by vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in 1 patient. The seizure outcome of Engel II was achieved by a change in antiepileptic medication in all 3 patients. Of the 34 patients, a total of 6 (17.6%) underwent resective reoperation only. The major reasons for this were the absence of a plausible hypothesis for invasive re-evaluation, the risk of postoperative deficit, and multifocal epilepsy in the rest of patients.
CONCLUSION: Although the reoperation rate was relatively low in our series, we can achieve better or even excellent seizure outcomes using other procedures in patients for whom resective surgery initially failed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilepsy surgery; Failure; Reoperation; Treatment options; Vagus nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25616458     DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Res        ISSN: 0920-1211            Impact factor:   3.045


  4 in total

1.  Failed epilepsy surgery: It is not too late.

Authors:  Dario J Englot
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 2.  Autonomic Regulation Therapy in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Una Buckley; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Jeffrey L Ardell
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-08

3.  Graph theoretical measures of fast ripples support the epileptic network hypothesis.

Authors:  Shennan A Weiss; Tomas Pastore; Iren Orosz; Daniel Rubinstein; Richard Gorniak; Zachary Waldman; Itzhak Fried; Chengyuan Wu; Ashwini Sharan; Diego Slezak; Gregory Worrell; Jerome Engel; Michael R Sperling; Richard J Staba
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 4.  Rates and predictors of success and failure in repeat epilepsy surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Max O Krucoff; Alvin Y Chan; Stephen C Harward; Shervin Rahimpour; John D Rolston; Carrie Muh; Dario J Englot
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.864

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.