Literature DB >> 25616193

Monitoring chemical reactions by low-field benchtop NMR at 45 MHz: pros and cons.

Maria Victoria Silva Elipe1, Robert R Milburn1.   

Abstract

Monitoring chemical reactions is the key to controlling chemical processes where NMR can provide support. High-field NMR gives detailed structural information on chemical compounds and reactions; however, it is expensive and complex to operate. Conversely, low-field NMR instruments are simple and relatively inexpensive alternatives. While low-field NMR does not provide the detailed information as the high-field instruments as a result of their smaller chemical shift dispersion and the complex secondary coupling, it remains of practical value as a process analytical technology (PAT) tool and is complimentary to other established methods, such as ReactIR and Raman spectroscopy. We have tested a picoSpin-45 (currently under ThermoFisher Scientific) benchtop NMR instrument to monitor three types of reactions by 1D (1) H NMR: a Fischer esterification, a Suzuki cross-coupling, and the formation of an oxime. The Fischer esterification is a relatively simple reaction run at high concentration and served as proof of concept. The Suzuki coupling is an example of a more complex, commonly used reaction involving overlapping signals. Finally, the oxime formation involved a reaction in two phases that cannot be monitored by other PAT tools. Here, we discuss the pros and cons of monitoring these reactions at a low-field of 45 MHz by 1D (1) H NMR.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1D 1H NMR; 45 MHz; Fischer esterification; NMR; Suzuki coupling; low-field NMR; reaction monitoring; tubeless NMR; two-phase reaction

Year:  2015        PMID: 25616193     DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Chem        ISSN: 0749-1581            Impact factor:   2.447


  9 in total

1.  Application of Ultra-Centrifugation and Bench-Top 19F NMR for Measuring Drug Phase Partitioning for the Ophthalmic Oil-in-Water Emulsion Products.

Authors:  Xinyi Wang; Sharadrao M Patil; David A Keire; Xiaoming Xu; Kang Chen
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  FoodPro: A Web-Based Tool for Evaluating Covariance and Correlation NMR Spectra Associated with Food Processes.

Authors:  Eisuke Chikayama; Ryo Yamashina; Keiko Komatsu; Yuuri Tsuboi; Kenji Sakata; Jun Kikuchi; Yasuyo Sekiyama
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2016-10-19

Review 3.  NMR reaction monitoring in flow synthesis.

Authors:  M Victoria Gomez; Antonio de la Hoz
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.883

4.  Benchtop Low-Frequency 60 MHz NMR Analysis of Urine: A Comparative Metabolomics Investigation.

Authors:  Justine Leenders; Martin Grootveld; Benita Percival; Miles Gibson; Federico Casanova; Philippe B Wilson
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-04-16

5.  Real-Time Insights into Biological Events: In-Cell Processes and Protein-Ligand Interactions.

Authors:  Linda Cerofolini; Stefano Giuntini; Letizia Barbieri; Matteo Pennestri; Anna Codina; Marco Fragai; Lucia Banci; Enrico Luchinat; Enrico Ravera
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Deeper Insight into Photopolymerization: The Synergy of Time-Resolved Nonuniform Sampling and Diffusion NMR.

Authors:  Kristina Kristinaityte; Adam Mames; Mariusz Pietrzak; Franz F Westermair; Wagner Silva; Ruth M Gschwind; Tomasz Ratajczyk; Mateusz Urbańczyk
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 16.383

7.  Monitoring Heterogeneously Catalyzed Hydrogenation Reactions at Elevated Pressures Using In-Line Flow NMR.

Authors:  Koen C H Tijssen; Bram J A van Weerdenburg; Hainan Zhang; J W G Janssen; Martin C Feiters; P Jan M van Bentum; Arno P M Kentgens
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Benchtop NMR for Online Reaction Monitoring of the Biocatalytic Synthesis of Aromatic Amino Alcohols.

Authors:  C Claaßen; K Mack; D Rother
Journal:  ChemCatChem       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 5.686

9.  Chemical Reaction Monitoring using Zero-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Enables Study of Heterogeneous Samples in Metal Containers.

Authors:  Dudari B Burueva; James Eills; John W Blanchard; Antoine Garcon; Román Picazo-Frutos; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Dmitry Budker
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 15.336

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.