| Literature DB >> 25616193 |
Maria Victoria Silva Elipe1, Robert R Milburn1.
Abstract
Monitoring chemical reactions is the key to controlling chemical processes where NMR can provide support. High-field NMR gives detailed structural information on chemical compounds and reactions; however, it is expensive and complex to operate. Conversely, low-field NMR instruments are simple and relatively inexpensive alternatives. While low-field NMR does not provide the detailed information as the high-field instruments as a result of their smaller chemical shift dispersion and the complex secondary coupling, it remains of practical value as a process analytical technology (PAT) tool and is complimentary to other established methods, such as ReactIR and Raman spectroscopy. We have tested a picoSpin-45 (currently under ThermoFisher Scientific) benchtop NMR instrument to monitor three types of reactions by 1D (1) H NMR: a Fischer esterification, a Suzuki cross-coupling, and the formation of an oxime. The Fischer esterification is a relatively simple reaction run at high concentration and served as proof of concept. The Suzuki coupling is an example of a more complex, commonly used reaction involving overlapping signals. Finally, the oxime formation involved a reaction in two phases that cannot be monitored by other PAT tools. Here, we discuss the pros and cons of monitoring these reactions at a low-field of 45 MHz by 1D (1) H NMR.Entities:
Keywords: 1D 1H NMR; 45 MHz; Fischer esterification; NMR; Suzuki coupling; low-field NMR; reaction monitoring; tubeless NMR; two-phase reaction
Year: 2015 PMID: 25616193 DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Chem ISSN: 0749-1581 Impact factor: 2.447