Literature DB >> 25616144

The adaptive significance of provisioning and foraging coordination between breeding partners.

Mylene M Mariette1, Simon C Griffith.   

Abstract

Sexual conflict over parental care relies on the fundamental assumption that parents do not share the cost of their partner's effort on future reproduction. However, this is unlikely to be true whenever partners breed together more than once. In that case, individuals should try to optimize the cost and benefits for the pair, rather than only for themselves. Here we seek to establish whether the synchronization of parents' provisioning visits to the nest could fulfill this function. We conducted a brood-size manipulation experiment on wild zebra finches to test whether nest visit synchrony was flexible and beneficial for nestlings' growth, while controlling for the confounding effects of pair "quality" and synchrony away from the nest during foraging. Using a network of readers to track parents at nests and feeding stations, we found that nest visit synchrony responded directly to the brood manipulation and increased with brood size. Synchrony at the nest and while foraging were correlated, but the latter better predicted nestling mass, possibly because it was associated with more regular provisioning patterns. Our findings suggest that parental coordination could indeed play an important role in partners' investment decisions, underpinning the evolution of the most prominent mating system in birds.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25616144     DOI: 10.1086/679441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  17 in total

1.  Familiarity enhances moment-to-moment behavioral coordination in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) dyads.

Authors:  Nora H Prior; Edward Smith; Robert J Dooling; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Female birds monitor the activity of their mates while brooding nest-bound young.

Authors:  Jonathan B Jenkins; Alexander J Mueller; Charles F Thompson; Scott K Sakaluk; E Keith Bowers
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Diurnal and Reproductive Stage-Dependent Variation of Parental Behaviour in Captive Zebra Finches.

Authors:  Boglárka Morvai; Sabine Nanuru; Douwe Mul; Nina Kusche; Gregory Milne; Tamás Székely; Jan Komdeur; Ádám Miklósi; Ákos Pogány
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Seabird parents provision their chick in a coordinated manner.

Authors:  Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas; Marcelo Araya-Salas; Dariusz Jakubas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Turn-taking in cooperative offspring care: by-product of individual provisioning behavior or active response rule?

Authors:  James L Savage; Lucy E Browning; Andrea Manica; Andrew F Russell; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Decreasing parental task specialization promotes conditional cooperation.

Authors:  Arne Iserbyt; Nolwenn Fresneau; Tiffanie Kortenhoff; Marcel Eens; Wendt Müller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Vocal exchanges during pair formation and maintenance in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  Pietro Bruno D'Amelio; Lisa Trost; Andries Ter Maat
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Body proportions for the facilitation of walking, running and flying: the case of partridges.

Authors:  Jesús Nadal; Carolina Ponz; Antoni Margalida
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Fitness Benefits of Mate Choice for Compatibility in a Socially Monogamous Species.

Authors:  Malika Ihle; Bart Kempenaers; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Implications of nutritional stress as nestling or fledgling on subsequent attractiveness and fecundity in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  Mariam Honarmand; E Tobias Krause; Marc Naguib
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.