Literature DB >> 25616062

Why the definition of high risk has been inappropriately used in previous carotid trials.

G J De Borst1, M Schermerhorn, F L Moll.   

Abstract

Carotid artery revascularization by endarterectomy is an effective means of stroke prevention in selected patients with carotid stenosis. With the development of endovascular techniques, carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been proposed as a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA), particularly in patients considered at high risk for CEA. Guidelines have established criteria that outline these patients who are considered at "high risk" for complications after CEA, to whom CAS may provide benefit. The validity of these theoretical high-risk criteria, however, is yet unproven, and, as a consequence, there is no clear evidence suggesting that the risk with CAS is lower in these high-risk patients compared with CEA. This manuscript summarizes the role of "high risk" within recent trials and discusses why the optimal treatment for these patients with deemed high risk for surgery remains a matter of debate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25616062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)        ISSN: 0021-9509            Impact factor:   1.888


  1 in total

1.  The impact of contralateral carotid artery stenosis on outcomes after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Alexander B Pothof; Peter A Soden; Margriet Fokkema; Sara L Zettervall; Sarah E Deery; Thomas C F Bodewes; Gert J de Borst; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.268

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.