Literature DB >> 25615757

Lack of security of networked medical equipment in radiology.

Vinu Moses1, Ipeson Korah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. There are few articles in the literature describing the security and safety aspects of networked medical equipment in radiology departments. Most radiologists are unaware of the security issues. We review the security of the networked medical equipment of a typical radiology department. MATERIALS AND METHODS. All networked medical equipment in a radiology department was scanned for vulnerabilities with a port scanner and a network vulnerability scanner, and the vulnerabilities were classified using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System. A network sniffer was used to capture and analyze traffic on the radiology network for exposure of confidential patient data. We reviewed the use of antivirus software and firewalls on the networked medical equipment. USB ports and CD and DVD drives in the networked medical equipment were tested to see whether they allowed unauthorized access. Implementation of the virtual private network (VPN) that vendors use to access the radiology network was reviewed. RESULTS. Most of the networked medical equipment in our radiology department used vulnerable software with open ports and services. Of the 144 items scanned, 64 (44%) had at least one critical vulnerability, and 119 (83%) had at least one high-risk vulnerability. Most equipment did not encrypt traffic and allowed capture of confidential patient data. Of the 144 items scanned, two (1%) used antivirus software and three (2%) had a firewall enabled. The USB ports were not secure on 49 of the 58 (84%) items with USB ports, and the CD or DVD drive was not secure on 17 of the 31 (55%) items with a CD or DVD drive. One of three vendors had an insecure implementation of VPN access. CONCLUSION. Radiologists and the medical industry need to urgently review and rectify the security issues in existing networked medical equipment. We hope that the results of our study and this article also raise awareness among radiologists about the security issues of networked medical equipment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  network security; networked medical equipment; networked radiology equipment; vulnerability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25615757     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.12882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Enterprise Imaging Value Proposition.

Authors:  Cheryl A Petersilge
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Cybersecurity of Hospitals: discussing the challenges and working towards mitigating the risks.

Authors:  Salem T Argaw; Juan R Troncoso-Pastoriza; Darren Lacey; Marie-Valentine Florin; Franck Calcavecchia; Denise Anderson; Wayne Burleson; Jan-Michael Vogel; Chana O'Leary; Bruce Eshaya-Chauvin; Antoine Flahault
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  The state of research on cyberattacks against hospitals and available best practice recommendations: a scoping review.

Authors:  Salem T Argaw; Nefti-Eboni Bempong; Bruce Eshaya-Chauvin; Antoine Flahault
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 2.796

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.