| Literature DB >> 25614793 |
Julian Chantrey1, Timothy D Dale1, Jonathan M Read2, Steve White3, Fiona Whitfield3, David Jones2, Colin J McInnes4, Michael Begon1.
Abstract
Infectious disease introduced by non-native species is increasingly cited as a facilitator of native population declines, but direct evidence may be lacking due to inadequate population and disease prevalence data surrounding an outbreak. Previous indirect evidence and theoretical models support squirrelpox virus (SQPV) as being potentially involved in the decline of red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) following the introduction of the non-native gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) to the United Kingdom. The red squirrel is a major UK conservation concern and understanding its continuing decline is important for any attempt to mitigate the decline. The red squirrel-gray squirrel system is also exemplary of the interplay between infectious disease (apparent competition) and direct competition in driving the replacement of a native by an invasive species. Time series data from Merseyside are presented on squirrel abundance and squirrelpox disease (SQPx) incidence, to determine the effect of the pathogen and the non-native species on the native red squirrel populations. Analysis indicates that SQPx in red squirrels has a significant negative impact on squirrel densities and their population growth rate (PGR). There is little evidence for a direct gray squirrel impact; only gray squirrel presence (but not density) proved to influence red squirrel density, but not red squirrel PGR. The dynamics of red SQPx cases are largely determined by previous red SQPx cases, although previous infection of local gray squirrels also feature, and thus, SQPV-infected gray squirrels are identified as potentially initiating outbreaks of SQPx in red squirrels. Retrospective serology indicates that approximately 8% of red squirrels exposed to SQPV may survive infection during an epidemic. This study further highlights the UK red squirrel - gray squirrel system as a classic example of a native species population decline strongly facilitated by infectious disease introduced by a non-native species. It is therefore paramount that disease prevention and control measures are integral in attempts to conserve red squirrels in the United Kingdom.Entities:
Keywords: Ecology; epidemic; epidemiology; infection; mammal; rodent; wildlife
Year: 2014 PMID: 25614793 PMCID: PMC4301051 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Central map shows area of interest within the United Kingdom and location of study areas; (A) Southport urban (number of transects t = 2), (B) Southport rural (t = 1), (C) Ainsdale North (t = 4), (D) Ainsdale South (t = 4), (E) Formby North (t = 4), (F) Formby South (t = 3), (G) Hightown (t = 2), and (H) Ince Blundell (t = 5). The surrounding plots show the squirrel densities (mean, weighted by transect length) calculated from transect surveys within that area (upper chart in plot area). The dashed lines indicate actual estimated squirrel densities, while the solid lines show those data with two-point smoothing. Red squirrel pox incidence based on submission of squirrelpox virus (SQPV)-positive carcases is shown in the lower chart in plot areas at 0 m (within study area) and up to 1500 m from the study area (the distance that SQPx cases shown to have the strongest association to red squirrel PGR in subsequent analysis). SQPV-positive cases were assumed to be capable of affecting multiple study areas (no physical barriers were present); therefore, all SQPV-positive cases within 1500 m are plotted for each area irrespective of whether they feature in plots for other areas The vertical gray dashed lines indicate 6 months prior to and after the first and last cases of red squirrel SQPx in that area. Transects are grouped depending on geographic location and whether either or both species were observed.
Abbreviations used in GLMM analysis
| Parameter | Abbreviation |
|---|---|
| Year | yr |
| Season | seas |
| Red squirrel density | rd |
| Red squirrel population growth rate at | rPGR |
| Gray squirrel density | gd |
| Gray squirrel population growth rate at | gPGR |
| Gray squirrel presence at time | gpres |
| Red SQPx cases per month at | |
| Gray squirrel positive SQPx cases per month at |
Optimal model of red squirrel density, with parameter coefficients shown. The ΔAIC values displayed are those achieved when the explanatory variable is dropped from the optimal model
| Factor | Red squirrel density | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIC | ΔAIC | Coefficient | SE | |||
| Intercept | 1743.55 | – | 3.6 | 0.28 | 12.75 | <2e-16 |
| Yr | ||||||
| 2005 | 1764.32 | 20.78 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.96 | 0.34 |
| 2006 | – | – | 0.25 | 0.17 | 1.45 | 0.15 |
| 2007 | – | – | 0.36 | 0.17 | 2.12 | 0.034 |
| 2008 | – | – | −0.50 | 0.26 | −1.88 | 0.060 |
| 2009 | – | – | −0.53 | 0.22 | −2.39 | 0.017 |
| Seas | 1774.77 | 31.22 | −0.62 | 0.10 | −5.98 | 2.3e-09 |
| gpres24 | 1752.34 | 8.79 | −1.5 | 0.47 | −3.17 | 0.0015 |
| gPGR12 | 1746.36 | 2.81 | −3.6 | 1.7 | −2.19 | 0.029 |
| 1751.83 | 8.29 | −0.11 | 0.037 | −3.02 | 0.0026 | |
| 1746.15 | 2.60 | −1.4 | 0.68 | −2.02 | 0.043 | |
| (1|transect) | 1879.05 | 135.51 | – | – | – | – |
Optimal model of red squirrel PGR, with parameter coefficients shown. The ΔAIC values displayed are those achieved when the explanatory variable is dropped from the optimal model
| Factor | Red squirrel PGR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIC | ΔAIC | Coefficient | SE | |||
| Intercept | −403.81 | – | 0.0022 | 0.017 | 0.13 | 0.90 |
| yr | ||||||
| 2005 | −403.71 | −0.11 | 0.011 | 0.022 | 0.50 | 0.62 |
| 2006 | – | – | 0.012 | 0.021 | 0.57 | 0.57 |
| 2007 | – | – | −0.0022 | 0.020 | −0.11 | 0.91 |
| 2008 | – | – | −0.041 | 0.022 | −1.83 | 0.067 |
| 2009 | – | – | 0.039 | 0.025 | 1.59 | 0.11 |
| rd12 | −391.62 | 12.19 | −0.00045 | 0.00012 | −3.84 | 0.00012 |
| rd24 | −396.56 | 7.26 | 0.00034 | 0.00011 | 3.08 | 0.0021 |
| gPGR0 | −386.56 | 17.26 | 0.44 | 0.098 | 4.50 | 6.9e-06 |
| −373.41 | 30.40 | −0.026 | 0.0044 | −5.93 | 2.9e-09 | |
| −392.64 | 11.17 | −0.16 | 0.042 | −3.69 | 0.00022 | |
| (1|transect) | −405.81 | −2.00 | – | – | – | – |
Optimal model of red squirrel SQPx cases per month, with parameter coefficients shown. The ΔAIC values displayed are those achieved when the explanatory variable is dropped from the optimal model
| Red squirrelpox cases at 1000 m | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIC | ΔAIC | Coefficient | SE | |||
| Intercept | 137.11 | −22.11 | 5573 | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| yr | ||||||
| 2005 | 201.80 | 64.69 | 17.13 | 5573 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 2006 | – | – | 18.50 | 5573 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 2007 | – | – | 17.28 | 5573 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 2008 | – | – | 19.18 | 5573 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | – | – | 1.81 | 5573 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 178.90 | 41.79 | 0.67 | 0.13 | 5.31 | 1.1e-07 | |
| 168.49 | 31.38 | 1.93 | 0.34 | 5.64 | 1.7e-08 | |
| 140.50 | 3.39 | −1.26 | 0.61 | −2.07 | 0.038 | |
| 140.72 | 3.61 | −6.05 | 3.15 | −1.92 | 0.054 | |
| 139.51 | 2.40 | 1.46 | 0.78 | 1.87 | 0.061 | |
| (1|transect) | 135.11 | −2.00 | – | – | – | – |
Calculation of the predicted exposure and survival rates of squirrelpox virus (SQPV) at site E. The numbers in brackets are the predicted numbers of individuals from the equivalent sample population derived from 41 individuals caught postepidemic from October 2009 to March 2010. This equates to 16 individuals (number in bold) in March 2009 after the population grew by a factor of 2.6 from March 2009 (end of SQPx epidemic) to March 2010 (when sampling ceased)