Literature DB >> 25614420

1-year risk-adjusted mortality and costs of percutaneous coronary intervention in the Veterans Health Administration: insights from the VA CART Program.

P Michael Ho1, Colin I O'Donnell2, Steven M Bradley2, Gary K Grunwald2, Christian Helfrich3, Michael Chapko3, Chuan-Fen Liu3, Thomas M Maddox2, Thomas T Tsai2, Robert L Jesse4, Stephan D Fihn5, John S Rumsfeld2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is significant interest in measuring health care value, but this concept has not been operationalized in specific patient cohorts. The longitudinal outcomes and costs for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) provide an opportunity to measure an aspect of health care value.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated variations in 1-year outcomes (risk-adjusted mortality) and risk-standardized costs of care for all patients undergoing PCI in the Veterans Affairs (VA) system from 2007 to 2010.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated all veterans undergoing PCI at any of 60 hospitals in the VA health care system, using data from the national VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) program. Primary outcomes were 1-year mortality and costs following PCI. Risk-standardized mortality and cost ratios were calculated, adjusting for cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities.
RESULTS: A median of 261 PCIs were performed in the 60 hospitals during the study period. Median 1-year unadjusted hospital mortality rate was 6.13%. Four hospitals were significantly above the 1-year risk-standardized median mortality rate, with median mortality ratios ranging from 1.23 to 1.28. No hospitals were significantly below median mortality. Median 1-year total unadjusted hospital costs were $46,302 per patient. There were 16 hospitals above and 19 hospitals below the risk-standardized median cost, with risk-standardized ratios ranging from 0.45 to 2.09, reflecting a much larger magnitude of variability in costs than in mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: There is much smaller variation in 1-year risk adjusted mortality than in risk-standardized costs after PCI in the VA. These findings suggest that there are opportunities to improve PCI value by reducing costs without compromising outcomes. This approach to evaluating outcomes and costs together may be a model for other health systems and accountable care organizations interested in operationalizing value measurement.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCI; costs; health care delivery; ischemic heart disease; outcomes; value

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25614420     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

1.  Exploring the Healthcare Value of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Appropriateness, Outcomes, and Costs in Michigan Hospitals.

Authors:  Daniel M Alyesh; Milan Seth; David C Miller; James M Dupree; John Syrjamaki; Devraj Sukul; Simon Dixon; Eve A Kerr; Hitinder S Gurm; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-06

2.  A Systematic Review of Direct Cardiovascular Event Costs: An International Perspective.

Authors:  Steve Ryder; Kathleen Fox; Pratik Rane; Nigel Armstrong; Ching-Yun Wei; Sohan Deshpande; Lisa Stirk; Yi Qian; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Clinical Trials Versus Clinical Practice: When Evidence and Practice Diverge--Should Nondiabetic Patients With 3-Vessel Disease and Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Be Preferentially Treated With CABG?

Authors:  Pranav Kansara; Sandra Weiss; William S Weintraub; Matthew C Hann; James Tcheng; S Tanveer Rab; Lloyd W Klein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Association Between Spending and Survival of Chronic Heart Failure Across Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

Authors:  Peter W Groeneveld; Elina L Medvedeva; Lorrie Walker; Andrea G Segal; Diane M Menno; Andrew J Epstein
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-07-03

5.  Rethinking rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention: a protocol of a multicentre cohort study on continuity of care, health literacy, adherence and costs at all care levels (the CONCARDPCI).

Authors:  Tone M Norekvål; Heather G Allore; Bjørn Bendz; Cathrine Bjorvatn; Britt Borregaard; Gunhild Brørs; Christi Deaton; Nina Fålun; Heather Hadjistavropoulos; Tina Birgitte Hansen; Stig Igland; Alf Inge Larsen; Pernille Palm; Trond Røed Pettersen; Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen; Jan Schjøtt; Rikke Søgaard; Irene Valaker; Ann Dorthe Zwisler; Svein Rotevatn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index: A Novel Predictor of Coronary Thrombus Burden in Patients with Non-ST Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Uğur Özkan; Muhammet Gürdoğan; Cihan Öztürk; Melik Demir; Ömer Feridun Akkuş; Efe Yılmaz; Servet Altay
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Outcomes and regional differences in practice in a worldwide coronary stent registry.

Authors:  Murat Cimci; Jawed Polad; Mamas Mamas; Andres Iniguez-Romo; Bernard Chevalier; Rajpal Abhaichand; Adel Aminian; Ariel Roguin; Gabriel Maluenda; Michael Angioi; Graham Cassel; Shoichi Kuramitsu; Lotte Jacobs; Roxane Debrus; Fazila Malik; David Hildick-Smith; Peep Laanmets; Marco Roffi
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.365

8.  Patient and facility variation in costs of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander C Perino; Jun Fan; Susan K Schmitt; Daniel W Kaiser; Paul A Heidenreich; Sanjiv M Narayan; Paul J Wang; Andrew Y Chang; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.