Literature DB >> 25614401

Antivascular ultrasound therapy: magnetic resonance imaging validation and activation of the immune response in murine melanoma.

Stephen J Hunt1, Terence Gade2, Michael C Soulen2, Stephen Pickup2, Chandra M Sehgal2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the treatment effects of antivascular ultrasound (US) with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced sonography, and histopathologic analysis in a murine melanoma model.
METHODS: Subcutaneous K1735 murine melanoma tumors were grown in syngeneic C3H/HeN mice. Quantitative tumor perfusion characteristics were measured before antivascular US treatment with both dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and high-resolution contrast-enhanced sonography. Tumors were subsequently treated with 1 or 3 minutes of continuous low-intensity US after intravenous administration of a US contrast agent. Treatment effects were assessed by quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, contrast-enhanced sonography, histopathologic analysis, and immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: Low-intensity antivascular US treatment resulted in approximately a doubling and tripling of the time to peak enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the 1- and 3-minute treatment groups, respectively, along with a significant decrease in contrast wash-out (P < .01). There was a potent reduction in tumor perfusion on contrast-enhanced sonography, with approximately 40% and 70% reductions in the tumor area perfused as assessed by contrast-enhanced sonography after 1 (P < .05) and 3 (P < .01) minutes of antivascular US. The pathologic and histologic changes spatially correlated with the regions of diminished perfusion seen on contrast-enhanced sonography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Antivascular US therapy resulted in a significant increase in the number of hypoxia-inducible factor 1A(+) cells, indicating tumor hypoxia (P < .01), and of CD45(+)/CD3(+) cells in tumors after treatment, in keeping with increased T-cell infiltration (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Antivascular US treatment effects extend beyond direct cytotoxicity from hemorrhagic necrosis to include ischemia-mediated cytotoxicity, enhanced small molecule retention, and intratumoral immune activation.
© 2015 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; immune; microbubble; therapeutic ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25614401     DOI: 10.7863/ultra.34.2.275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  13 in total

Review 1.  A review of low-intensity ultrasound for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrew K W Wood; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Fluid flow rate dictates the efficacy of low-intensity anti-vascular ultrasound therapy in a microfluidic model.

Authors:  Brandon J DeOre; Peter A Galie; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI detects changes in vascular transport rate constants following treatment with thermally-sensitive liposomal doxorubicin.

Authors:  Brett Z Fite; Azadeh Kheirolomoom; Josquin L Foiret; Jai W Seo; Lisa M Mahakian; Elizabeth S Ingham; Sarah M Tam; Alexander D Borowsky; Fitz-Roy E Curry; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 4.  Ultrasound and microbubble-mediated drug delivery and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Daiki Omata; Lisa Munakata; Kazuo Maruyama; Ryo Suzuki
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 5.  The role of anti-tumor immunity of focused ultrasound for the malignancies: depended on the different ablation categories.

Authors:  Luping Zhang; Chao Yang; Yixing Gao; Jinyun Chen; Wenzhi Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Dose-dependent effects of ultrasound therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Laith R Sultan; Julia C D'Souza; Mrigendra B Karmacharya; Stephen J Hunt; Angela K Brice; Terence Gade; Andrew Kw Wood; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp       Date:  2020-11-17

7.  The effects of percutaneous ethanol injection followed by 20-kHz ultrasound and microbubbles on rabbit hepatic tumors.

Authors:  Zhi Yong Shen; Gan Lin Xia; Ming Feng Wu; Lei Yan Ji; Yong Jun Li
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  Ultrasound-Responsive Cavitation Nuclei for Therapy and Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Klazina Kooiman; Silke Roovers; Simone A G Langeveld; Robert T Kleven; Heleen Dewitte; Meaghan A O'Reilly; Jean-Michel Escoffre; Ayache Bouakaz; Martin D Verweij; Kullervo Hynynen; Ine Lentacker; Eleanor Stride; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 9.  Synergies between therapeutic ultrasound, gene therapy and immunotherapy in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Nisi Zhang; James Wang; Josquin Foiret; Zhifei Dai; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 10.  Focused Ultrasound Immunotherapy for Central Nervous System Pathologies: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Colleen T Curley; Natasha D Sheybani; Timothy N Bullock; Richard J Price
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.