Literature DB >> 25614344

The use of glucocorticoids in marmoset wasting syndrome.

Pete Otovic1, Shanequa Smith, Eric Hutchinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Marmoset wasting syndrome (MWS) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in captive marmosets, and thus far no reliable treatment has been found. Glucocorticoids are used widely to treat inflammatory conditions of the GI tract such as human and feline inflammatory bowel disease, which, such as MWS, are histologically characterized by chronic lymphoplasmacytic inflammation in the intestines. Budesonide is a glucocorticoid with few reported side effects due to the majority of it being metabolized into inactive compounds by the liver before entering the systemic circulation.
METHOD: Eleven marmosets presented with antemortem signs consistent with MWS and were treated with oral prednisone or budesonide for 8 weeks.
RESULTS: The marmosets in our study demonstrated a significant increase in both weight and albumin levels (relative to pre-treatment values) after glucocorticoid therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Glucocorticoids are an effective therapy to ameliorate the clinical signs associated with MWS with minimal side effects.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Medical Primatology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  callitrichid; corticosteroids; inflammatory bowel disease; monkey

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25614344      PMCID: PMC4415595          DOI: 10.1111/jmp.12159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Primatol        ISSN: 0047-2565            Impact factor:   0.667


Introduction

Marmoset wasting syndrome (MWS) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in captive marmosets. Its prevalence has been reported to be as high as 60% in captive colonies 21, but these ranges may be misleading because one of the challenges surrounding MWS is that the same label has been applied inconsistently and to a dizzying array of disease processes. The only clinical sign consistently attributed to MWS is chronic weight loss, with concurrent alopecia and diarrhea also commonly reported, but paresis and paralysis have also been attributed to MWS (Table1). Associated clinical pathology findings have included increases in calprotectin and decreases in hematocrit, whereas others have failed to find such changes and instead revealed decreases in albumin (Table1). Histologically, many report a lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of the intestines, but even here, there is disagreement, with at least one report finding that neutrophils are the predominant white blood cell in the intestines.
Table 1

This is a list of published studies that operationalized marmoset wasting syndrome and used it to define a study population

CitationsClinical signsClinical pathologySignificant histological findings
Beglinger et al. 6Weight loss, emaciation, progressing to muscular weakness, and hindlimb paralysisAnemia, ↑ AST, ↑ ALP, ↑ ALTPancreatitis with Trichospirura eggs
Brack & Rothe 7Diarrhea, cachexia, and hindlimb paresis to paralysisN/APancreatic and renal fibrosis, lymphocytic inflammation and tubular degeneration of kidneys, and hepatic hemosiderosis
Kuehnel et al. 18Chronic diarrhea, weight loss, poor fur condition, and tail alopeciaN/AN/A
Baxter et al. 5Weight <325 g, weight loss >0.05% peak weight per dayAlbumin <3.5 g/dlChronic mild inflammation of 2 or more intestinal segments or chronic moderate or severe inflammation in one intestinal segment
Nakashima et al. 23Persistent high-viscosity diarrhea for at least 2 weeksFecal occult blood positive, ↓ hematocrit, ↑calprotectin, higher WBC than control groupNeutrophilic infiltrate in colon and apoptosis
Logan & Khan 20Weight loss, muscle atrophy, and tail alopeciaMacrocytic normochromic anemia, ↑ALP, ↓ ALB, ↓TP, ↑plateletsChronic active colitis with loss or tortuous, branching crypts
Lewis et al. 19Poor weight gain, anorexia, alopecia, and transient diarrheaAnemiaN/A
Barnard et al. 330% weight loss, alopecia, chronic diarrhea, and muscle atrophyN/AN/A
Shimwell et al. 28Failure to thrive and generalized weakness in weanlings↑ CK, ↑ AST, ↓ albuminN/A
King 17Weight loss, unkempt hair coat, stiff movement in hindlimb, tail base alopecia, selective eatingN/AN/A
Chalifoux et al. (1982) 1025–50% weight lossN/AWithin colon/cecum: decreased goblet cells, crypt abscesses, karyorrhexis and/or atypia of the epithelium, infiltration of lamina propria with mononuclear cells and/or neutrophils
This is a list of published studies that operationalized marmoset wasting syndrome and used it to define a study population While multiple groups have proposed etiologies and targeted therapies, no consensus has emerged in the literature. Gluten sensitivity is one proposed cause, with provision of a gluten-free diet appearing to ameliorate gastrointestinal symptoms in some animals 18. Even within this study, however, only a fraction of the animals with clinical symptoms of MWS demonstrated gluten sensitivity. MWS has also been linked to infestation with Trichospirura leptostoma, but these marmosets showed hindlimb paresis without a decrease in albumin or total protein, all of which contrast to most other published descriptions of MWS. In our colony and others 5,20, marmoset wasting disease is associated with weight loss and low serum albumin. In fact, a serum albumin below 3.5 g/dl or a weight of <325 g has 92% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 100% positive predictive value for postmortem lymphoplasmacytic inflammation in the small and/or large intestines in our animals 5. Thus, body weight and serum albumin may serve as useful markers of disease progression. Further, with no consensus as to etiology or specific therapeutic target for MWS, treatment might best be directed at the common clinical and pathological symptoms upon which most descriptions agree, namely GI inflammation and weight loss. Glucocorticoids are arguably the most effective treatment for inducing remission in humans with inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease), with remission rates up to 89% 27. While prednisone is one example of an effective glucocorticoid, there are several adverse side effects associated with its use 11. In humans, one of the most common side effects associated with prednisone use is osteopenia 9. This is especially problematic in marmosets affected with MWS in our colony, as marmosets with MWS are over seven times more likely to be concurrently afflicted with metabolic bone disease and corresponding loss of bone density 5, a finding that has been mirrored elsewhere 15. Budesonide is a glucocorticoid with few reported side effects, which largely result from up to 90% of it being metabolized into inactive compounds by the liver before entering the systemic circulation 2. In addition, budesonide has a 15–200 times greater affinity for glucocorticoid receptors than prednisolone. Thus, budesonide primarily exerts its actions in the GI tract by altering the production of IL-6, IL-1, NF-κB, and TNF-α 4. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of glucocorticoid therapy and specifically budesonide on MWS and predicted that the anti-inflammatory effects of such therapy would reverse the weight loss and decreases in serum albumin levels seen in our animals with MWS.

Materials and methods

Humane care guidelines

All experimental procedures were approved and overseen by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Johns Hopkins University. Strict adherence to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by the National Institutes of Health, the Animal Welfare Act by the United States Department of Agriculture, and the Weatherall report by the Medical Research Council was observed.

Study animals

As in 4,5, all marmosets in this study were between the ages of 2 and 6 years of age and housed in family units, in pairs, or singly as part of a large breeding and experimental colony at Johns Hopkins University, an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC)-accredited institution. Animals were permitted ad libitum access to water and were fed a complete and balanced diet consisting of a custom homogenized blend of Teklad 8794N New World Primate Diet (Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, USA), Zupreem 9920 CS canned marmoset diet (Shawnee, KS, USA), and Bio-Serv Newberne Hayes Vitamin Mix (San Diego, CA, USA), supplemented with various fruits and yogurt. Environmental enrichment in the form of visual and auditory contact with conspecifics, complex environments, and manipulanda were provided to all marmosets. Experienced animal care technicians observed animals at least once daily and more often if necessitated by experimental or medical need. The Johns Hopkins University Research Animal Resources veterinarians diagnosed, treated, and/or managed any medical illness or injury in the marmosets, and if euthanasia due to disease was warranted, marmosets were euthanized with an intravenous overdose of Euthasol (Virbac Corporation, Fort Worth, TX, USA) under deep ketamine anesthesia. Marmosets presenting for progressive weight loss, adult body weight of <325 g, alopecia, or diarrhea received a physical exam, complete blood count, and serum chemistry, and fecal flotation and cultures were performed. The blood was collected from the femoral vein using 25-gauge needles, stored in lithium heparin tubes, and analyzed using a Hemavet 950 hematology analyzer (Drew Scientific Inc, Oxford, CT, USA) and vetACE chemical analyzer (Alfa Wassermann, West Caldwell, NJ, USA). The fecal flotation was performed in house using zinc sulfate solution to detect the presence of parasites such as Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Toxoplasmosis, and nematodes. Fecal cultures were submitted to detect the presence of Klebsiella spp, EPEC, Campylobacter spp, Yersinia spp, and Shigella spp. Although we did not specifically rule out Trichospirura infestation in individual cases, the vast majority of animals from this long-standing colony receive complete necropsies upon euthanasia or death, and this parasite has never been found in our facilities. Animals were included in this study if their body weight was ≤325 g and their serum albumin was ≤3.5 g/dl 5. The body weight and albumin levels must have remained below their respective thresholds for at least two consecutive samples, drawn 2 weeks apart.

Budesonide therapy

Eleven animals met these inclusion criteria and were begun on glucocorticoid therapy. Prednisone was used as the initial treatment for four animals, starting at a once-daily oral dose of 1 mg/kg that was then adjusted according to response to therapy. All of these animals were subsequently switched to treatment with budesonide. The remaining seven animals received budesonide as their only therapy. Regardless of when budesonide therapy was begun, it was initiated at 0.5 mg per animal orally once per day for 8 weeks. If after the initial 8 weeks an animal had not responded to therapy (i.e., still met inclusion criteria), the dose was increased to 0.75 mg and the animal followed for an additional 8 weeks. The budesonide was compounded into a pina colada-flavored liquid suspension by Kaye's Pharmacy (Baltimore, MD, USA). Serum albumin and body weight were measured every 2 weeks during treatment.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed with a two-tailed repeated measures t-test using the stata statistical software (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas USA) package. For each individual animal, a mean of all available weight and serum albumin values prior to treatment was used as the ‘baseline’ condition, and this was compared to a mean of all values collected during treatment, regardless of duration or drug sequence. A Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was applied to base criteria for significance of P < 0.05. An ABAB single-subject research design and graph were used to depict the results from one of the study marmosets that happened to relapse after the cessation of the first 8-week course of glucocorticoid therapy. These data do not lend itself to statistical analysis and instead are presented in graphical form for visual inspection. However, this design allows the replication of both control and treatment conditions and encourages multiple data points to be collected and interpreted within each condition without being obscured via summary statistics.

Results

The results of a repeated measures t-test revealed that marmosets in our colony had a higher mean weight (M = 318.03 g) during treatment with glucocorticoids than they did prior to treatment [M = 287.75 g, t(10) = 2.75, P = 0.021]. Concordantly, a repeated measures t-test substantiated that marmosets had a high albumin during glucocorticoid therapy (M = 3.86 g/dl) than they did before treatment was initiated [M = 2.80 g/dl, t(10) = 6.23, P = 0.0001]. These results are depicted in Table2.
Table 2

Mean weight and albumin levels for each of the 11 marmosets included in our study both before and during glucocorticoid therapy

AnimalMean weight (g)Mean albumin (mg/dl)
Pre-treatmentDuring treatmentPre-treatmentDuring treatment
A2553462.354.53
B2933212.953.81
C2533102.503.85
D2493042.934.22
E2883083.334.15
F3182773.173.48
G3353402.833.58
H3003242.854.23
I2902813.303.52
J2733172.433.35
K3133722.153.78
Group means2883182.803.86
SE8.508.310.120.11

All weights are in grams and albumin is in milligrams per deciliter. SE, standard error.

Mean weight and albumin levels for each of the 11 marmosets included in our study both before and during glucocorticoid therapy All weights are in grams and albumin is in milligrams per deciliter. SE, standard error. The results from one marmoset using a single-subject (ABAB) design are depicted in Figs1 and 2. The graphs reveal stable and substantial increases in albumin (Fig.1) and body weight (Fig.2) in response to glucocorticoid therapy and decreases in both parameters after the cessation of therapy.
Figure 1

Change in albumin levels in one marmoset depending on its treatment status. Prior to therapy, albumin was below 2.0 g/dl. It steadily increased while being administered glucocorticoids and then sharply declined after the cessation of treatment. After treatment was re-initiated, albumin levels returned to the same level they were during the initial treatment period.

Figure 2

Body weight changes in one marmoset varied with treatment status. This marmoset's weight declined before glucocorticoid therapy was initiated and increased during the treatment. After discontinuing the first round of treatment, the marmoset's weight declined again and was ameliorated when glucocorticoids were readministered.

Change in albumin levels in one marmoset depending on its treatment status. Prior to therapy, albumin was below 2.0 g/dl. It steadily increased while being administered glucocorticoids and then sharply declined after the cessation of treatment. After treatment was re-initiated, albumin levels returned to the same level they were during the initial treatment period. Body weight changes in one marmoset varied with treatment status. This marmoset's weight declined before glucocorticoid therapy was initiated and increased during the treatment. After discontinuing the first round of treatment, the marmoset's weight declined again and was ameliorated when glucocorticoids were readministered.

Discussion

The results of this study suggest that oral glucocorticoid therapy ameliorates decreases in the two diagnostic parameters most closely associated with MWS, body weight, and serum albumin. The lymphoplasmacytic inflammation found in the intestines of our marmosets with MWS shares histological characteristics with inflammatory bowel disease of dogs, cats, and humans, where oral glucocorticoids, most often in the form of prednisone, are the first-line therapy in mild to moderate cases. Although some research suggests that prednisone is more effective for inducing remission than budesonide 27, the side effects of prednisone administration make this drug less ideal and can include polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, redistribution of fat, thinning of skin, osteopenia, increased susceptibility to infections, and hyperglycemia 11. There is evidence that budesonide, a drug with fewer systemic affects due to high ‘first pass’ metabolism in the liver, is effective at inducing remission in humans with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis 16, microscopic colitis 22, and Crohn's disease 27. Further, budesonide has been observed to reduce disease activity indices or induce clinical improvement and has been observed in dogs with signs of gastrointestinal inflammation 13,24, in murine experimental models of colitis 1, and anecdotally in cats with inflammatory bowel disease 30. Unlike prednisone, which has fairly well-established dosing guidelines, there is no established dosing guide for budesonide therapy in any animal species, and dose-dependent efficacy varies greatly. For instance, humans with IBD have needed anywhere from 3 to 18 mg per day 2, while dogs have been given doses from 1 to 9 mg per day 13,24, and mice have been administered doses ranging from 0.168 to 0.5 mg/kg 1,26. While feline doses have not been published in the literature, clinical guidelines suggest doses of 1–2 mg per animal daily 30. It is worth noting that in mice, it has been demonstrated that higher doses are not necessarily more effective, but are more likely to cause adverse side effects 1,26. Moreover, humans are more likely to respond to treatment with a higher concentration once per day than they are to the same dose split and given every 12 hours 8. Thus, it is plausible that marmosets would also follow these trends. While our dosing of 0.5 mg per animal was somewhat arbitrary, this dose was based upon per animal clinical dosing guidelines used in cats and dogs. While budesonide is a relatively effective drug for inducing remission in humans with IBD, neither it nor prednisone is very effective at maintaining remission 2,27,29. Azathioprine, 6-MP, and methotrexate are used to maintain remission in Crohn's disease, and any of these drugs or aminosalicylates are effective at maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis 29. The relapse rate for patients treated with budesonide therapy has been reported to be as high as 67% 14. Thus far we have had one marmoset relapse approximately 2 months after the cessation of budesonide therapy. This animal responded well to a second 8-week course and is currently being maintained on 0.125 mg per day with no adverse consequences (Figs1 and 2). Of 11 marmosets that have been treated, six have ceased therapy (some for as long as 6 months) and continue to thrive. Although this study demonstrates the usefulness of budesonide as therapy for animals with chronic MWS, our clinical experience using budesonide for animals with more acute forms of GI illness has failed to produce similar results. In three cases, we initiated budesonide therapy to animals showing acute signs of gastrointestinal illness but not meeting the criteria for inclusion in this experiment. These three animals all died within a week of presentation despite budesonide therapy. However, remission rates and/or clinical improvement resulting from budesonide treatment can be as low as 18% in humans while still being more effective than placebo or other drugs. Moreover, budesonide is typically only indicated for mild to moderate forms of IBD in humans and thus is unlikely to be successful in the acute management of end stage disease 2,25. Other forms of therapy, which include TNF-α inhibitors, intravenous methylprednisolone, and cyclosporine, are more appropriate for refractory or severe IBD in humans and might be useful in such acute marmoset cases 12,29. However, TNF-α inhibitors may be cost prohibitive, limiting their availability in most vivaria. It is possible that budesonide treatment increased weight and albumin via mechanisms other than by reducing gastrointestinal inflammation. For instance, it is possible that the budesonide worked by simply increasing appetite as is seen with prednisone administration. While we cannot definitively rule this out, this is not a common side effect of budesonide in humans or dogs 11,13. Another possibility is that the animals included in this study would have improved regardless of budesonide therapy. However, this is not likely because MWS is known as a uniformly progressive disease without treatment, and these animals met previously established diagnostic criteria for MWS 5. Additionally, in the one animal that was observed to relapse after the cessation of budesonide therapy, reinstitution of budesonide treatment again reversed this animal's decline. In conclusion, glucocorticoid therapy has demonstrated substantial potential to ameliorate clinical signs of MWS in our colony. Further, budesonide is an effective choice of glucocorticoid and is preferable to prednisone because of its decreased risk of side effects. Future experiments could be aimed at refining dosage requirements or comparing budesonide to other anti-inflammatory treatments such as TNF-α inhibitors or mesalamine.
  27 in total

Review 1.  IBD in 2013: enriching the therapeutic armamentarium for IBD.

Authors:  Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Randomized, controlled trial of budesonide and prednisone for the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease in dogs.

Authors:  T L Dye; K J Diehl; S L Wheeler; D S Westfall
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Plasma concentrations and therapeutic effects of budesonide in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Marco Pietra; Federico Fracassi; Alessia Diana; Teresa Gazzotti; Giuliano Bettini; Angelo Peli; Maria Morini; Giampiero Pagliuca; Paola Roncada
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.156

4.  Digestive efficiency mediated by serum calcium predicts bone mineral density in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michael R Jarcho; Michael L Power; Donna G Layne-Colon; Suzette D Tardif
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.371

5.  Once-daily budesonide MMX® extended-release tablets induce remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: results from the CORE I study.

Authors:  William J Sandborn; Simon Travis; Luigi Moro; Richard Jones; Theres Gautille; Robert Bagin; Michael Huang; Phil Yeung; E David Ballard
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  The influence of gluten on clinical and immunological status of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Friederike Kuehnel; Matthias Mietsch; Thomas Buettner; Ingrid Vervuert; Rayan Ababneh; Almuth Einspanier
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 0.667

7.  Efficacy of drugs used in the treatment of IBD and combinations thereof in acute DSS-induced colitis in mice.

Authors:  Holger Sann; Jasmin von Erichsen; Manuela Hessmann; Andreas Pahl; Angelika Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 8.  Clinical care and diseases of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Elisabeth Ludlage; Keith Mansfield
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.982

9.  Detection of calprotectin and apoptotic activity in the colon of marmosets with chronic diarrhea.

Authors:  Erika Nakashima; Yasushi Okano; Kimie Niimi; Eiki Takahashi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 1.267

10.  Serum albumin and body weight as biomarkers for the antemortem identification of bone and gastrointestinal disease in the common marmoset.

Authors:  Victoria K Baxter; Gillian C Shaw; Nathaniel P Sotuyo; Cathy S Carlson; Erik J Olson; M Christine Zink; Joseph L Mankowski; Robert J Adams; Eric K Hutchinson; Kelly A Metcalf Pate
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  Fecal Concentrations of N-methylhistamine in Common Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Joseph Cyrus Parambeth; Franklin R López; Rosana Lopez; Sarah B Keyser; Jonathan A Lidbury; Jan S Suchodolski; Jörg M Steiner
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Tranexamic Acid and Supportive Measures to Treat Wasting Marmoset Syndrome.

Authors:  Takuro Yoshimoto; Kimie Niimi; Eiki Takahashi
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Immunohistochemical Characterization of a Duodenal Adenocarcinoma with Pulmonary, Hepatic and Parapatellar Metastases in a Common Marmoset (Callithrixjacchus).

Authors:  Cornelia Peterson; Jessica Plunkard; Andrew Johanson; Jessica Izzi; Kathleen Gabrielson
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 1.311

4.  The Common Marmoset-Biomedical Research Animal Model Applications and Common Spontaneous Diseases.

Authors:  Hyo-Jeong Han; Sarah J Powers; Kathleen L Gabrielson
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 5.  Clinical Management of Gastrointestinal Disease in the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Casey Fitz; Anna Goodroe; Lauren Wierenga; Andres Mejia; Heather Simmons
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.521

6.  Serum matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) as a biochemical marker for wasting marmoset syndrome.

Authors:  Takuro Yoshimoto; Kimie Niimi; Eiki Takahashi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  The profile of lipid metabolites in urine of marmoset wasting syndrome.

Authors:  Arisa Yamazaki; Tatsuro Nakamura; Takako Miyabe-Nishiwaki; Akihiro Hirata; Rikako Inoue; Koji Kobayashi; Yusuke Miyazaki; Yuta Hamasaki; Akiyo Ishigami; Nanae Nagata; Akihisa Kaneko; Makoto Koizumi; Hiroki Ohta; Hirotaka James Okano; Takahisa Murata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Colonic inflammation affects myenteric alpha-synuclein in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Henry Resnikoff; Jeanette M Metzger; Mary Lopez; Viktoriya Bondarenko; Andres Mejia; Heather A Simmons; Marina E Emborg
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2019-05-07

9.  Measurement of the α1-proteinase inhibitor (α1-antitrypsin) of common marmoset and intestinal protein loss in wasting syndrome.

Authors:  Kimie Niimi; Hiromasa Morishita; Masaya Usui; Reiko Ito; Shino Kurata; Nobuko Mataga; Eiki Takahashi
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Novel gastrointestinal disease in common marmosets characterised by duodenal dilation: a clinical and pathological study.

Authors:  Takayuki Mineshige; Takashi Inoue; Masahiko Yasuda; Terumi Yurimoto; Kenji Kawai; Erika Sasaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.