Literature DB >> 25614228

Interprofessional communication failures in acute care chains: How can we identify the causes?

Janneke E van Leijen-Zeelenberg1, Arno J A van Raak, Inge G P Duimel-Peeters, Mariëlle E A L Kroese, Peter R G Brink, Hubertus J M Vrijhoef.   

Abstract

Although communication failures between professionals in acute care delivery occur, explanations for these failures remain unclear. We aim to gain a deeper understanding of interprofessional communication failures by assessing two different explanations for them. A multiple case study containing six cases (i.e. acute care chains) was carried out in which semi-structured interviews, physical artifacts and archival records were used for data collection. Data were entered into matrices and the pattern-matching technique was used to examine the two complementary propositions. Based on the level of standardization and integration present in the acute care chains, the six acute care chains could be divided into two categories of care processes, with the care chains equally distributed among the categories. Failures in communication occurred in both groups. Communication routines were embedded within organizations and descriptions of communication routines in the entire acute care chain could not be found. Based on the results, failures in communication could not exclusively be explained by literature on process typology. Literature on organizational routines was useful to explain the occurrence of communication failures in the acute care chains. Organizational routines can be seen as repetitive action patterns and play an important role in organizations, as most processes are carried out by means of routines. The results of this study imply that it is useful to further explore the role of organizational routines on interprofessional communication in acute care chains to develop a solution for failures in handover practices.

Keywords:  Communication; health services research; interprofessional practice

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25614228     DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2014.1003802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  5 in total

1.  Using Incident Reports to Assess Communication Failures and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth Umberfield; Amir A Ghaferi; Sarah L Krein; Milisa Manojlovich
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2019-03-29

2.  Patient involvement in interprofessional education: A qualitative study yielding recommendations on incorporating the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Sjim Romme; Matthijs H Bosveld; Marloes A Van Bokhoven; Jascha De Nooijer; Hélène Van den Besselaar; Jerôme J J Van Dongen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions.

Authors:  Gijs Hesselink; Sivera Berben; Thimpe Beune; Lisette Schoonhoven
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Heidelberger Interprofessionelle Ausbildungsstation (HIPSTA): a practice- and theory-guided approach to development and implementation of Germany's first interprofessional training ward.

Authors:  André L Mihaljevic; Jochen Schmidt; Anika Mitzkat; Pascal Probst; Theresa Kenngott; Johanna Mink; Christoph A Fink; Alexej Ballhausen; Jessy Chen; Aylin Cetin; Lisa Murrmann; Gisela Müller; Cornelia Mahler; Burkhard Götsch; Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2018-08-15

5.  Lack of focus on nutrition and documentation in nursing homes, home care- and home nursing: the self-perceived views of the primary care workforce.

Authors:  S J Håkonsen; P U Pedersen; A Bygholm; C N Thisted; M Bjerrum
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.