Literature DB >> 25614087

The impact of maternal obesity on iron status, placental transferrin receptor expression and hepcidin expression in human pregnancy.

L Garcia-Valdes1, C Campoy2, H Hayes3, J Florido4, I Rusanova2, M T Miranda5, H J McArdle3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with decreased iron status, possibly due to a rise in hepcidin, an inflammatory protein known to reduce iron absorption. In animals, we have shown that maternal iron deficiency is minimised in the foetus by increased expression of placental transferrin receptor (pTFR1), resulting in increased iron transfer at the expense of maternal iron stores.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the effect of obesity during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal iron status in human cohorts and whether the placenta can compensate for decreased maternal iron stores by increasing pTFR1 expression. SUBJECTS/
METHODS: A total of 240 women were included in this study. One hundred and fifty-eight placentas (Normal: 90; Overweight: 37; Obese: 31) were collected at delivery. Maternal iron status was measured by determining serum transferrin receptor (sTFR) and ferritin levels at 24 and 34 weeks and at delivery. Hepcidin in maternal and cord blood was measured by ELISA and pTFR1 in placentas by western blotting and real-time RT-PCR.
RESULTS: Low iron stores were more common in obese women. Hepcidin levels (ng ml(-1)) at the end of the pregnancy were higher in obese than normal women (26.03±12.95 vs 18.00±10.77, P<0.05). Maternal hepcidin levels were correlated with maternal iron status (sTFR r=0.2 P=0.025), but not with neonatal values. mRNA and protein levels of pTFR1 were both inversely related to maternal iron status. For mRNA and all women, sTFR r=0.2 P=0.044. Ferritin mRNA levels correlated only in overweight women r=-0.5 P=0.039 with hepcidin (r=0.1 P=0.349), irrespective of maternal body mass index (BMI).
CONCLUSIONS: The data support the hypothesis that obese pregnant women have a greater risk of iron deficiency and that hepcidin may be a regulatory factor. Further, we show that the placenta responds to decreased maternal iron status by increasing pTFR1 expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25614087     DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2015.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


  54 in total

Review 1.  Obesity and the placenta: A consideration of nutrient exchange mechanisms in relation to aberrant fetal growth.

Authors:  L Higgins; S L Greenwood; M Wareing; C P Sibley; T A Mills
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Serum transferrin receptor for the detection of iron deficiency in pregnancy.

Authors:  M T Carriaga; B S Skikne; B Finley; B Cutler; J D Cook
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Recommendations to prevent and control iron deficiency in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  1998-04-03

4.  Maternal hepcidin is associated with placental transfer of iron derived from dietary heme and nonheme sources.

Authors:  Melissa F Young; Ian Griffin; Eva Pressman; Allison W McIntyre; Elizabeth Cooper; Thomas McNanley; Z Leah Harris; Mark Westerman; Kimberly O O'Brien
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Gut microbiota composition is associated with body weight, weight gain and biochemical parameters in pregnant women.

Authors:  A Santacruz; M C Collado; L García-Valdés; M T Segura; J A Martín-Lagos; T Anjos; M Martí-Romero; R M Lopez; J Florido; C Campoy; Y Sanz
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  Laboratory assessment of iron status in pregnancy.

Authors:  Thomas Walsh; Sean D O'Broin; Sharon Cooley; Jennifer Donnelly; John Kennedy; Robert F Harrison; Corinna McMahon; Michael Geary
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Inflammation and iron deficiency in the hypoferremia of obesity.

Authors:  L B Yanoff; C M Menzie; B Denkinger; N G Sebring; T McHugh; A T Remaley; J A Yanovski
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 8.  Soluble transferrin receptor for the evaluation of erythropoiesis and iron status.

Authors:  Yves Beguin
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.786

9.  Effect of iron deficiency on placental transfer of iron and expression of iron transport proteins in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  L Gambling; R Danzeisen; S Gair; R G Lea; Z Charania; N Solanky; K D Joory; S K Srai; H J McArdle
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 10.  Fetal regulation of iron transport during pregnancy.

Authors:  Lorraine Gambling; Christine Lang; Harry J McArdle
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  26 in total

1.  Maternal iron status during pregnancy compared with neonatal iron status better predicts placental iron transporter expression in humans.

Authors:  Cora M Best; Eva K Pressman; Chang Cao; Elizabeth Cooper; Ronnie Guillet; Olivia L Yost; Jonathan Galati; Tera R Kent; Kimberly O O'Brien
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Impact of maternal, antenatal and birth-associated factors on iron stores at birth: data from a prospective maternal-infant birth cohort.

Authors:  E K McCarthy; L C Kenny; J O B Hourihane; A D Irvine; D M Murray; M E Kiely
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Increased birth weight is associated with altered gene expression in neonatal foreskin.

Authors:  L J Reynolds; R I Pollack; R J Charnigo; C S Rashid; A J Stromberg; S Shen; J M O'Brien; K J Pearson
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Prevalence of anemia and associations between neonatal iron status, hepcidin, and maternal iron status among neonates born to pregnant adolescents.

Authors:  Sunmin Lee; Ronnie Guillet; Elizabeth M Cooper; Mark Westerman; Mark Orlando; Tera Kent; Eva Pressman; Kimberly O O'Brien
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 5.  The placenta: the forgotten essential organ of iron transport.

Authors:  Chang Cao; Mark D Fleming
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 6.  Iron status of North American pregnant women: an update on longitudinal data and gaps in knowledge from the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Kimberly O O'Brien; Yuan Ru
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Prepregnancy Obesity Is Not Associated with Iron Utilization during the Third Trimester.

Authors:  Mary Dawn Koenig; Elizabeth Klikuszowian; Kimberly O O'Brien; Heather Pauls; Alana Steffen; Victoria DeMartelly; Rungnapa Ruchob; Lauren Welke; Nefertiti Hemphill; Bazil LaBomascus; Lacey Pezley; Andrew McLeod; Bruni Hirsch; Carol Estwing Ferrans; Lisa Tussing-Humphreys
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Integrated bioinformatics analysis reveals novel key biomarkers and potential candidate small molecule drugs in gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Varun Alur; Varshita Raju; Basavaraj Vastrad; Anandkumar Tengli; Chanabasayya Vastrad; Shivakumar Kotturshetti
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Maternal Overweight and Obesity during Pregnancy Are Associated with Neonatal, but Not Maternal, Hepcidin Concentrations.

Authors:  Andrew D Jones; Zhen Shi; Nathalie J Lambrecht; Yaping Jiang; Jingmin Wang; Margit Burmeister; Ming Li; Betsy Lozoff
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 4.687

Review 10.  Are Pregnant Women Who Are Living with Overweight or Obesity at Greater Risk of Developing Iron Deficiency/Anaemia?

Authors:  Anna A Wawer; Nicolette A Hodyl; Susan Fairweather-Tait; Bernd Froessler
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.