Charles Marcus1, Vasavi Paidpally1, Alexander Antoniou1, Atif Zaheer1, Richard L Wahl2, Rathan M Subramaniam3. 1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and. 3. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland rsubram4@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently ruled that only 3 posttherapy follow-up (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans are funded for a tumor type per patient and any additional follow-up PET/CT scans will be funded at the discretion of the local Medicare administrator. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the added value of 4 or more follow-up PET/CT scans to clinical assessment and impact on patient management. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective study. A total of 1,171 patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer who had undergone (18)F-FDG PET/CT at a single tertiary center from 2001 to 2013 were identified. Among these, 85 patients (7.3%) had undergone 4 or more follow-up PET/CT scans, for a total of 285 fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans. Median follow-up from the fourth follow-up PET/CT scan was 31.4 mo (range, 0-155.2 mo). The follow-up PET/CT scan results were correlated with clinical assessment and treatment changes. RESULTS: Of the 285 fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans, 149 (52.28%) were interpreted as positive and 136 (47.7%) as negative for recurrence or metastasis. A total of 47 patients (55.3%) died during the study period. PET/CT identified recurrence or metastasis in 44.3% of scans performed without prior clinical suspicion and ruled out recurrence or metastasis in 24.2% of scans performed with prior clinical suspicion. The PET/CT scan resulted in a treatment change in 28.1% (80/285) of the patients. New treatment was initiated for 20.4% (58/285) of the scans, treatment was changed in 5.6% (16/285), and ongoing treatment was stopped in 2.1% (6/285). CONCLUSION: The fourth and subsequent (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans performed during follow-up after completion of primary treatment added value to clinical assessment and changed management 28.1% of the time.
UNLABELLED: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently ruled that only 3 posttherapy follow-up (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans are funded for a tumor type per patient and any additional follow-up PET/CT scans will be funded at the discretion of the local Medicare administrator. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the added value of 4 or more follow-up PET/CT scans to clinical assessment and impact on patient management. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective study. A total of 1,171 patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer who had undergone (18)F-FDG PET/CT at a single tertiary center from 2001 to 2013 were identified. Among these, 85 patients (7.3%) had undergone 4 or more follow-up PET/CT scans, for a total of 285 fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans. Median follow-up from the fourth follow-up PET/CT scan was 31.4 mo (range, 0-155.2 mo). The follow-up PET/CT scan results were correlated with clinical assessment and treatment changes. RESULTS: Of the 285 fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans, 149 (52.28%) were interpreted as positive and 136 (47.7%) as negative for recurrence or metastasis. A total of 47 patients (55.3%) died during the study period. PET/CT identified recurrence or metastasis in 44.3% of scans performed without prior clinical suspicion and ruled out recurrence or metastasis in 24.2% of scans performed with prior clinical suspicion. The PET/CT scan resulted in a treatment change in 28.1% (80/285) of the patients. New treatment was initiated for 20.4% (58/285) of the scans, treatment was changed in 5.6% (16/285), and ongoing treatment was stopped in 2.1% (6/285). CONCLUSION: The fourth and subsequent (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans performed during follow-up after completion of primary treatment added value to clinical assessment and changed management 28.1% of the time.
Authors: Philip Joseph; Amorina Ishai; Venkatesh Mani; David Kallend; James H F Rudd; Zahi A Fayad; Ahmed Tawakol Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Julio Francisco Jiménez-Bonilla; Remedios Quirce; I Martínez-Rodríguez; María De Arcocha-Torres; José Manuel Carril; Ignacio Banzo Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2016-09-30