Literature DB >> 25613534

Risk stratification of metastatic neck nodes by CT and PET in patients with head and neck cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy.

Ying-Chun Lin1, Shang-Wen Chen2, Te-Chun Hsieh3, Kuo-Yang Yen3, Shih-Neng Yang4, Yao-Ching Wang1, Chia-Hung Kao5.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT on the outcome of metastatic neck node (MNN) in patients with head and neck cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.
METHODS: This patient-based study included 91 patients diagnosed with pharyngeal cancers with MNN (N1, 15; N2, 70; N3, 6). All had pretreatment CT and PET/CT before definitive chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy. Parameters of MNNs for each patient, including maximal diameter, nodal volume, radiologic central necrosis, maximum standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), were retrieved for the analysis. Nodal relapse-free survival (NRFS) and survivals were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent predictors were identified using Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 18 mo, 64 patients remained nodal relapse-free, and 27 experienced neck recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that the application of 40% of the maximal uptake of nodal TLG (N-TLG40%) 38 g or greater (P = 0.03; hazard ratio, 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-6.30) and radiologic necrosis on CT scan (P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 10.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.56-47.62) were 2 adverse features for NRFS. Patients who had an N-TLG40% 38 g or greater and central radiologic necrosis had a significantly inferior 2-y NRFS (53% vs. 77% and 45% vs. 95%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The outcome of MNNs in patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy can be predicted according to radiologic necrosis and N-TLG40% value. The 2 adverse features should be validated in future trials. In this way, patients can be treated alternatively or aggressively.
© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG PET/CT; CT; head and neck cancer; metastatic neck lymph node; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25613534     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.148023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  7 in total

1.  PET-based prognostic survival model after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Joël Castelli; A Depeursinge; A Devillers; B Campillo-Gimenez; Y Dicente; J O Prior; E Chajon; F Jegoux; C Sire; O Acosta; E Gherga; X Sun; B De Bari; J Bourhis; R de Crevoisier
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Post-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Mehdi Taghipour; Esther Mena; Matthew J Kruse; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  Combined prognostic value of pretreatment anemia and cervical node necrosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A large-scale retrospective study.

Authors:  Lu-Lu Zhang; Guan-Qun Zhou; Yi-Yang Li; Ling-Long Tang; Yan-Ping Mao; Ai-Hua Lin; Jun Ma; Zhen-Yu Qi; Ying Sun
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Influence of Cervical Node Necrosis of Different Grades on the Prognosis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lu-Lu Zhang; Jia-Xiang Li; Guan-Qun Zhou; Ling-Long Tang; Jun Ma; Ai-Hua Lin; Zhen-Yu Qi; Ying Sun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Utility and limitations of metabolic parameters in head and neck cancer: finding a practical segmentation method.

Authors:  Jefferson Rijo-Cedeño; Jorge Mucientes; Ithzel María Villarreal; Ana Royuela; Patricia García Vicente; José Ramón García-Berrocal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.236

6.  Prognostic value of MTV and TLG of 18 F-FDG PET in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aihua Jin; Xing Lin; Xuezhe Yin; Yinfeng Cui; Liguang Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16- High Risk Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Madhava Aryal; Pin Li; Choonik Lee; Matthew Schipper; Peter G Hawkins; Christina Chapman; Dawn Owen; Aleksandar F Dragovic; Paul Swiecicki; Keith Casper; Francis Worden; Theodore S Lawrence; Avraham Eisbruch; Michelle Mierzwa
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.