Literature DB >> 25613432

The application of valgus urethral mucosa anastomosis in the operation of posterior urethral stricture.

Linlin Zhang1, Dapeng Wu, Yule Chen, Dalin He, Xunyi Nan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of valgus mucosa anastomosis in posterior urethra reconstruction.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 116 patients who had undergone anastomotic repair of posterior urethral strictures between 2009 and 2013. Seventy-six patients underwent valgus urethral mucosa anastomosis (group A), and 40 underwent traditional end-to-end anastomosis (group B). The voiding status, complication rate, and adjuvant therapy were compared between the two groups. The clinical outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative intervention was needed.
RESULTS: Patient age ranged from 11 to 68 years (mean 38.2 ± 10.6). Follow-up was 5-59 months (mean 19.5 ± 13.2). The estimated urethral stricture length was 0.5-3.5 cm (mean 1.85 ± 0.40). Of all patients, the number of patients with simple stricture and complicated stricture were 47 and 69 respectively, and there was no significant difference in the complexity of stricture between group A and group B (60.5 vs. 57.5%, P > 0.05). Besides, there was no significant difference in the follow-up time and length of stricture between the two groups (31.6 ± 12.0 vs. 35.1 ± 14.8 months, P > 0.05). Compared to group B, the operation success rate in group A was greatly improved (92.1 vs. 80%, P < 0.05), while the incidence of complication was similar between the two groups (31.6 vs. 27.5%, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The valgus urethral mucosa anastomosis could significantly improve the operation success rate of end-to-end anastomosis, reduce the stricture recurrence rate, improve the long-term urination function, and not increase the incidence of complications. So, valgus urethral mucosa anastomosis is an easy, effective and reliable urethral anastomosis technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25613432     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-015-0912-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  11 in total

Review 1.  Reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption.

Authors:  George D Webster; Michael L Guralnick
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Predictors of surgical approach to repair pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects.

Authors:  Mamdouh M Koraitim
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption injuries: outcome analysis in 82 patients.

Authors:  A F Morey; J W McAninch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  On the art of anastomotic posterior urethroplasty: a 27-year experience.

Authors:  Mamdouh M Koraitim
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  1-Stage delayed bulboprostatic anastomotic repair of posterior urethral rupture: 60 patients with 1-year followup.

Authors:  J N Corriere
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Failed posterior urethroplasty: lessons learned.

Authors:  Mamdouh M Koraitim
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Analysis of factors contributing to success or failure of 1-stage urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  C G Roehrborn; J D McConnell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Male urethral strictures and their management.

Authors:  Lindsay A Hampson; Jack W McAninch; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Perineal repair of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects: experience in 120 patients during the last 10 years.

Authors:  Brian J Flynn; Fernando C Delvecchio; George D Webster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Prevention of complications resulting from pelvic fracture urethral injuries--and from their surgical management.

Authors:  R Turner-Warwick
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.