Literature DB >> 25613426

Educational outcomes following breech delivery: a record-linkage study of 456947 children.

Daniel F Mackay1, Rachael Wood1, Albert King1, David N Clark1, Sally-Ann Cooper1, Gordon C S Smith1, Jill P Pell2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstetric management of term breech infants changed dramatically following the Term Breech Trial which suggested increased serious neonatal morbidity following trial of labour. Short-term morbidity is a poor proxy of long-term neurological sequelae. We determined whether vaginal breech delivery was associated with educational outcomes.
METHODS: We linked three Scotland-wide administrative databases at an individual level: the ScotXed school census; Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) examination results; and Scottish Morbidity Record (SMR02) maternity database. The linkage provided information on singleton children, born at term, attending Scottish schools between 2006 and 2011.
RESULTS: Of the 456 947 eligible children, 1574 (0.3%) had vaginal breech deliveries, 12 489 (2.7%) planned caesarean section for breech presentation and 442 090 (96.9%) vaginal cephalic deliveries. The percentage of term breech infants delivered vaginally fell from 23% to 7% among children who started school in 2006 and 2011, respectively. Of children born by vaginal breech delivery, 1.5% had a low 5-min Apgar score (≤3) compared with only 0.4% of those born by either breech caesarean section [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 6.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.44-8.54, p<0.001] or cephalic vaginal delivery (adjusted OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.99-4.93, p<0.001). Children born by vaginal breech delivery had lower examination attainment than those born by either planned caesarean section for breech presentation (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32, p=0.020) or vaginal cephalic delivery (adjusted OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28, p=0.029).
CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal delivery of term breech infants was associated with lower examination attainment, as well as poorer Apgar scores, suggesting that the adverse effects are not just short-term.
© The Author 2015; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apgar score; breech presentation; educational status; intellectual disability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25613426      PMCID: PMC4415090          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyu270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  30 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of cognitive outcome after breech presentation at birth.

Authors:  H T Sørensen; F H Steffensen; J Olsen; S Sabroe; M W Gillman; P Fischer; K J Rothman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marek Glezerman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Why vaginal breech delivery should still be offered.

Authors:  Savas M Menticoglou
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2006-05

4.  Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium.

Authors:  François Goffinet; Marion Carayol; Jean-Michel Foidart; Sophie Alexander; Serge Uzan; Damien Subtil; Gérard Bréart
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants.

Authors:  Christine C Th Rietberg; Patty M Elferink-Stinkens; Gerard H A Visser
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Outcome of term breech births: 10-year experience at a district general hospital.

Authors:  Poonam Pradhan; Michele Mohajer; Sanjeev Deshpande
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among term breech births: Swedish experience 1987-1993.

Authors:  J Roman; O Bakos; S Cnattingius
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal factors associated with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Deborah Bilder; Judith Pinborough-Zimmerman; Judith Miller; William McMahon
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Is breech presentation a risk factor for cerebral palsy? A Norwegian birth cohort study.

Authors:  Guro L Andersen; Lorentz M Irgens; Jon Skranes; Kjell A Salvesen; Alf Meberg; Torstein Vik
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 5.449

10.  Time trend in the risk of delivery-related perinatal and neonatal death associated with breech presentation at term.

Authors:  Dharmintra Pasupathy; Angela M Wood; Jill P Pell; Michael Fleming; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The association of birth by caesarean section and cognitive outcomes in offspring: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie A Blake; Madeleine Gardner; Jake Najman; James G Scott
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Planned mode of birth after previous caesarean section and special educational needs in childhood: a population-based record linkage cohort study.

Authors:  K E Fitzpatrick; J J Kurinczuk; M A Quigley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 7.331

3.  The Scottish school leavers cohort: linkage of education data to routinely collected records for mortality, hospital discharge and offspring birth characteristics.

Authors:  Catherine H Stewart; Ruth Dundas; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  David Wastlund; Alexandros A Moraitis; Alison Dacey; Ulla Sovio; Edward C F Wilson; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 11.069

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.