Xiaolong Cao1, Haobo Jiang2. 1. Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA. 2. Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA. Electronic address: haobo.jiang@okstate.edu.
Abstract
The genome sequence of Manduca sexta was recently determined using 454 technology. Cufflinks and MAKER2 were used to establish gene models in the genome assembly based on the RNA-Seq data and other species' sequences. Aided by the extensive RNA-Seq data from 50 tissue samples at various life stages, annotators over the world (including the present authors) have manually confirmed and improved a small percentage of the models after spending months of effort. While such collaborative efforts are highly commendable, many of the predicted genes still have problems which may hamper future research on this insect species. As a biochemical model representing lepidopteran pests, M. sexta has been used extensively to study insect physiological processes for over five decades. In this work, we assembled Manduca datasets Cufflinks 3.0, Trinity 4.0, and Oases 4.0 to assist the manual annotation efforts and development of Official Gene Set (OGS) 2.0. To further improve annotation quality, we developed methods to evaluate gene models in the MAKER2, Cufflinks, Oases and Trinity assemblies and selected the best ones to constitute MCOT 1.0 after thorough crosschecking. MCOT 1.0 has 18,089 genes encoding 31,666 proteins: 32.8% match OGS 2.0 models perfectly or near perfectly, 11,747 differ considerably, and 29.5% are absent in OGS 2.0. Future automation of this process is anticipated to greatly reduce human efforts in generating comprehensive, reliable models of structural genes in other genome projects where extensive RNA-Seq data are available.
The genome sequence of nclass="Species">Manduca sexta was receclass="Chemical">ntly determiclass="Chemical">ned usiclass="Chemical">ng 454 techclass="Chemical">nology. Cuffliclass="Chemical">nks aclass="Chemical">nd MAKER2 were used to establish geclass="Chemical">ne models iclass="Chemical">n the geclass="Chemical">nome assembly based oclass="Chemical">n the RNA-Seq data aclass="Chemical">nd other species' sequeclass="Chemical">nces. Aided by the exteclass="Chemical">nsive RNA-Seq data from 50 tissue samples at various life stages, aclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">notators over the world (iclass="Chemical">ncludiclass="Chemical">ng the preseclass="Chemical">nt authors) have maclass="Chemical">nually coclass="Chemical">nfirmed aclass="Chemical">nd improved a small perceclass="Chemical">ntage of the models after speclass="Chemical">ndiclass="Chemical">ng moclass="Chemical">nths of effort. While such collaborative efforts are highly commeclass="Chemical">ndable, maclass="Chemical">ny of the predicted geclass="Chemical">nes still have problems which may hamper future research oclass="Chemical">n this iclass="Chemical">nsect species. As a biochemical model represeclass="Chemical">nticlass="Chemical">ng lepidopteraclass="Chemical">n pests, class="Chemical">n class="Species">M. sexta has been used extensively to study insect physiological processes for over five decades. In this work, we assembled Manduca datasets Cufflinks 3.0, Trinity 4.0, and Oases 4.0 to assist the manual annotation efforts and development of Official Gene Set (OGS) 2.0. To further improve annotation quality, we developed methods to evaluate gene models in the MAKER2, Cufflinks, Oases and Trinity assemblies and selected the best ones to constitute MCOT 1.0 after thorough crosschecking. MCOT 1.0 has 18,089 genes encoding 31,666 proteins: 32.8% match OGS 2.0 models perfectly or near perfectly, 11,747 differ considerably, and 29.5% are absent in OGS 2.0. Future automation of this process is anticipated to greatly reduce human efforts in generating comprehensive, reliable models of structural genes in other genome projects where extensive RNA-Seq data are available.
Authors: Christiam Camacho; George Coulouris; Vahram Avagyan; Ning Ma; Jason Papadopoulos; Kevin Bealer; Thomas L Madden Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Brian J Haas; Alexie Papanicolaou; Moran Yassour; Manfred Grabherr; Philip D Blood; Joshua Bowden; Matthew Brian Couger; David Eccles; Bo Li; Matthias Lieber; Matthew D MacManes; Michael Ott; Joshua Orvis; Nathalie Pochet; Francesco Strozzi; Nathan Weeks; Rick Westerman; Thomas William; Colin N Dewey; Robert Henschel; Richard D LeDuc; Nir Friedman; Aviv Regev Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Michael R Kanost; Estela L Arrese; Xiaolong Cao; Yun-Ru Chen; Sanjay Chellapilla; Marian R Goldsmith; Ewald Grosse-Wilde; David G Heckel; Nicolae Herndon; Haobo Jiang; Alexie Papanicolaou; Jiaxin Qu; Jose L Soulages; Heiko Vogel; James Walters; Robert M Waterhouse; Seung-Joon Ahn; Francisca C Almeida; Chunju An; Peshtewani Aqrawi; Anne Bretschneider; William B Bryant; Sascha Bucks; Hsu Chao; Germain Chevignon; Jayne M Christen; David F Clarke; Neal T Dittmer; Laura C F Ferguson; Spyridoula Garavelou; Karl H J Gordon; Ramesh T Gunaratna; Yi Han; Frank Hauser; Yan He; Hanna Heidel-Fischer; Ariana Hirsh; Yingxia Hu; Hongbo Jiang; Divya Kalra; Christian Klinner; Christopher König; Christie Kovar; Ashley R Kroll; Suyog S Kuwar; Sandy L Lee; Rüdiger Lehman; Kai Li; Zhaofei Li; Hanquan Liang; Shanna Lovelace; Zhiqiang Lu; Jennifer H Mansfield; Kyle J McCulloch; Tittu Mathew; Brian Morton; Donna M Muzny; David Neunemann; Fiona Ongeri; Yannick Pauchet; Ling-Ling Pu; Ioannis Pyrousis; Xiang-Jun Rao; Amanda Redding; Charles Roesel; Alejandro Sanchez-Gracia; Sarah Schaack; Aditi Shukla; Guillaume Tetreau; Yang Wang; Guang-Hua Xiong; Walther Traut; Tom K Walsh; Kim C Worley; Di Wu; Wenbi Wu; Yuan-Qing Wu; Xiufeng Zhang; Zhen Zou; Hannah Zucker; Adriana D Briscoe; Thorsten Burmester; Rollie J Clem; René Feyereisen; Cornelis J P Grimmelikhuijzen; Stavros J Hamodrakas; Bill S Hansson; Elisabeth Huguet; Lars S Jermiin; Que Lan; Herman K Lehman; Marce Lorenzen; Hans Merzendorfer; Ioannis Michalopoulos; David B Morton; Subbaratnam Muthukrishnan; John G Oakeshott; Will Palmer; Yoonseong Park; A Lorena Passarelli; Julio Rozas; Lawrence M Schwartz; Wendy Smith; Agnes Southgate; Andreas Vilcinskas; Richard Vogt; Ping Wang; John Werren; Xiao-Qiang Yu; Jing-Jiang Zhou; Susan J Brown; Steven E Scherer; Stephen Richards; Gary W Blissard Journal: Insect Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 4.714