Literature DB >> 25612770

Development and validation of determinative and confirmatory LC-MS/MS methodologies for total florfenicol and tulathromycin residues in bovine, equine and porcine kidney, liver and muscle tissues.

Rick W Fedeniuk1, Del McKenzie2, Massey Mizuno3, Connie Neiser4, Collin O'Byrne5, Bryn Shurmer6.   

Abstract

Separate methods for the quantitation and confirmation of regulatory relevant residue concentrations of total florfenicol and tulathromycin residues in multiple tissue matrices were developed and validated. Total florfenicol residues, determined and expressed as florfenicol amine (FFA) equivalents, were quantified and confirmed over a concentration range of 100-4000ng/g, with an LOD of 33ng/g, while total tulathromyicn residues, determined as CP-60,300 and expressed as tulathromycin equivalents, were quantified and confirmed over a concentration range of 500-10,000ng/g, with an LOD of 300ng/g. A 2 or 1h acid digestion for the FFA and tulathromycin methods, respectively, followed by extraction, cleanup, and concentration using mixed-mode strong cation-exchange SPE cartridges was used. Quantitation and confirmation were accomplished using commercially available tri-deuterated FFA (FFA-D3) as internal standard and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of three transitions per target analyte. Mean recoveries and matrix effects were 60% and 25%; and 100% and 110%, respectively for the target analytes florfenicol amine and CP-60,300. Intra-lab method reproducibilities ranged from 7 to 11% RSD, which are within the AOAC recommended HORRATr guidelines for method reproducibilities estimated from single laboratory validation studies. Blind spikes showed that method bias was generally less than 15% for both methods within the calibration range. Both methods have been shown to meet requirements for use in national chemical residue monitoring programs. Crown
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid-hydrolysis; CP-60,300; Florfenicol; Matrix effects; Tulathromycin; Variance components

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25612770     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Presence and Levels of Enrofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Sulfaquinoxaline and Oxytetracycline in Broiler Chickens after Drug Administration.

Authors:  Débora Cristina Sampaio de Assis; Guilherme Resende da Silva; Isabela Pereira Lanza; Ana Cláudia Dos Santos Rossi Ribeiro; Ângela Maria Quintão Lana; Leonardo José Camargos Lara; Tadeu Chaves de Figueiredo; Silvana de Vasconcelos Cançado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A single LC-MS/MS validated method for tulathromycin quantification in plasma, seminal plasma, and urine to be applied in a pharmacokinetic study in bull.

Authors:  Andrea Barbarossa; Anisa Bardhi; Teresa Gazzotti; Gaetano Mari; Giampiero Pagliuca
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.234

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.