OBJECTIVE: Exon-skipping therapies aim to convert Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) into less severe Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) by altering pre-mRNA splicing to restore an open reading frame, allowing translation of an internally deleted and partially functional dystrophin protein. The most common single exon deletion-exon 45 (Δ45)-may theoretically be treated by skipping of either flanking exon (44 or 46). We sought to predict the impact of these by assessing the clinical severity in dystrophinopathy patients. METHODS: Phenotypic data including clinical diagnosis, age at wheelchair use, age at loss of ambulation, and presence of cardiomyopathy were analyzed from 41 dystrophinopathy patients containing equivalent in-frame deletions. RESULTS: As expected, deletions of either exons 45 to 47 (Δ45-47) or exons 45 to 48 (Δ45-48) result in BMD in 97% (36 of 37) of subjects. Unexpectedly, deletion of exons 45 to 46 (Δ45-46) is associated with the more severe DMD phenotype in 4 of 4 subjects despite an in-frame transcript. Notably, no patients with a deletion of exons 44 to 45 (Δ44-45) were found within the United Dystrophinopathy Project database, and this mutation has only been reported twice before, which suggests an ascertainment bias attributable to a very mild phenotype. INTERPRETATION: The observation that Δ45-46 patients have typical DMD suggests that the conformation of the resultant protein may result in protein instability or altered binding of critical partners. We conclude that in DMD patients with Δ45, skipping of exon 44 and multiexon skipping of exons 46 and 47 (or exons 46-48) are better potential therapies than skipping of exon 46 alone.
OBJECTIVE: Exon-skipping therapies aim to convert Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) into less severe Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) by altering pre-mRNA splicing to restore an open reading frame, allowing translation of an internally deleted and partially functional dystrophin protein. The most common single exon deletion-exon 45 (Δ45)-may theoretically be treated by skipping of either flanking exon (44 or 46). We sought to predict the impact of these by assessing the clinical severity in dystrophinopathy patients. METHODS: Phenotypic data including clinical diagnosis, age at wheelchair use, age at loss of ambulation, and presence of cardiomyopathy were analyzed from 41 dystrophinopathy patients containing equivalent in-frame deletions. RESULTS: As expected, deletions of either exons 45 to 47 (Δ45-47) or exons 45 to 48 (Δ45-48) result in BMD in 97% (36 of 37) of subjects. Unexpectedly, deletion of exons 45 to 46 (Δ45-46) is associated with the more severe DMD phenotype in 4 of 4 subjects despite an in-frame transcript. Notably, no patients with a deletion of exons 44 to 45 (Δ44-45) were found within the United Dystrophinopathy Project database, and this mutation has only been reported twice before, which suggests an ascertainment bias attributable to a very mild phenotype. INTERPRETATION: The observation that Δ45-46 patients have typical DMD suggests that the conformation of the resultant protein may result in protein instability or altered binding of critical partners. We conclude that in DMDpatients with Δ45, skipping of exon 44 and multiexon skipping of exons 46 and 47 (or exons 46-48) are better potential therapies than skipping of exon 46 alone.
Authors: Nathalie M Goemans; Mar Tulinius; Johanna T van den Akker; Brigitte E Burm; Peter F Ekhart; Niki Heuvelmans; Tjadine Holling; Anneke A Janson; Gerard J Platenburg; Jessica A Sipkens; J M Ad Sitsen; Annemieke Aartsma-Rus; Gert-Jan B van Ommen; Gunnar Buyse; Niklas Darin; Jan J Verschuuren; Giles V Campion; Sjef J de Kimpe; Judith C van Deutekom Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sebahattin Cirak; Virginia Arechavala-Gomeza; Michela Guglieri; Lucy Feng; Silvia Torelli; Karen Anthony; Stephen Abbs; Maria Elena Garralda; John Bourke; Dominic J Wells; George Dickson; Matthew J A Wood; Steve D Wilton; Volker Straub; Ryszard Kole; Stephen B Shrewsbury; Caroline Sewry; Jennifer E Morgan; Kate Bushby; Francesco Muntoni Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-07-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Laura van Vliet; Christa L de Winter; Judith C T van Deutekom; Gert-Jan B van Ommen; Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Kevin M Flanigan; Diane M Dunn; Andrew von Niederhausern; Payam Soltanzadeh; Eduard Gappmaier; Michael T Howard; Jacinda B Sampson; Jerry R Mendell; Cheryl Wall; Wendy M King; Alan Pestronk; Julaine M Florence; Anne M Connolly; Katherine D Mathews; Carrie M Stephan; Karla S Laubenthal; Brenda L Wong; Paula J Morehart; Amy Meyer; Richard S Finkel; Carsten G Bonnemann; Livija Medne; John W Day; Joline C Dalton; Marcia K Margolis; Veronica J Hinton; Robert B Weiss Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Yi-Li Min; Francesco Chemello; Hui Li; Cristina Rodriguez-Caycedo; Efrain Sanchez-Ortiz; Alex A Mireault; John R McAnally; John M Shelton; Yu Zhang; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eric N Olson Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2020-05-30 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Jackie L McCourt; Katrina K Rhett; Michele A Jaeger; Joseph J Belanto; Dana M Talsness; James M Ervasti Journal: Skelet Muscle Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 4.912
Authors: Ayhan Atmanli; Andreas C Chai; Miao Cui; Zhaoning Wang; Takahiko Nishiyama; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eric N Olson Journal: Circ Res Date: 2021-08-10 Impact factor: 23.213