Literature DB >> 25612137

Rot is a key regulator of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation.

Joe M Mootz1, Meredith A Benson, Cortney E Heim, Heidi A Crosby, Jeffrey S Kavanaugh, Paul M Dunman, Tammy Kielian, Victor J Torres, Alexander R Horswill.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a significant cause of chronic biofilm infections on medical implants. We investigated the biofilm regulatory cascade and discovered that the repressor of toxins (Rot) is part of this pathway. A USA300 community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain deficient in Rot was unable to form a biofilm using multiple different assays, and we found rot mutants in other strain lineages were also biofilm deficient. By performing a global analysis of transcripts and protein production controlled by Rot, we observed that all the secreted protease genes were up-regulated in a rot mutant, and we hypothesized that this regulation could be responsible for the biofilm phenotype. To investigate this question, we determined that Rot bound to the protease promoters, and we observed that activity levels of these enzymes, in particular the cysteine proteases, were increased in a rot mutant. By inactivating these proteases, biofilm capacity was restored to the mutant, demonstrating they are responsible for the biofilm negative phenotype. Finally, we tested the rot mutant in a mouse catheter model of biofilm infection and observed a significant reduction in biofilm burden. Thus S. aureus uses the transcription factor Rot to repress secreted protease levels in order to build a biofilm.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25612137      PMCID: PMC4467170          DOI: 10.1111/mmi.12943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  62 in total

1.  Rot and SaeRS cooperate to activate expression of the staphylococcal superantigen-like exoproteins.

Authors:  Meredith A Benson; Sarit Lilo; Tyler Nygaard; Jovanka M Voyich; Victor J Torres
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Staphopains modulate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm integrity.

Authors:  Joe M Mootz; Cheryl L Malone; Lindsey N Shaw; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  sarA-mediated repression of protease production plays a key role in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus USA300 isolates.

Authors:  Agnieszka K Zielinska; Karen E Beenken; Lara N Mrak; Horace J Spencer; Ginell R Post; Robert A Skinner; Alan J Tackett; Alexander R Horswill; Mark S Smeltzer
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Genetic tools to enhance the study of gene function and regulation in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Bose; Paul D Fey; Kenneth W Bayles
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  A secreted bacterial protease tailors the Staphylococcus aureus virulence repertoire to modulate bone remodeling during osteomyelitis.

Authors:  James E Cassat; Neal D Hammer; J Preston Campbell; Meredith A Benson; Daniel S Perrien; Lara N Mrak; Mark S Smeltzer; Victor J Torres; Eric P Skaar
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 21.023

6.  Staphylococcus aureus Staphopain A inhibits CXCR2-dependent neutrophil activation and chemotaxis.

Authors:  Alexander J Laarman; Gerdien Mijnheer; Joe M Mootz; Willemien J M van Rooijen; Maartje Ruyken; Cheryl L Malone; Erik C Heezius; Richard Ward; Graeme Milligan; Jos A G van Strijp; Carla J C de Haas; Alexander R Horswill; Kok P M van Kessel; Suzan H M Rooijakkers
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  The staphylococcal accessory regulator, SarA, is an RNA-binding protein that modulates the mRNA turnover properties of late-exponential and stationary phase Staphylococcus aureus cells.

Authors:  John M Morrison; Kelsi L Anderson; Karen E Beenken; Mark S Smeltzer; Paul M Dunman
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 5.293

8.  A coverslip-based technique for evaluating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation on human plasma.

Authors:  Jennifer N Walker; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  A genetic resource for rapid and comprehensive phenotype screening of nonessential Staphylococcus aureus genes.

Authors:  Paul D Fey; Jennifer L Endres; Vijaya Kumar Yajjala; Todd J Widhelm; Robert J Boissy; Jeffrey L Bose; Kenneth W Bayles
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Low levels of β-lactam antibiotics induce extracellular DNA release and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Kaplan; Era A Izano; Prerna Gopal; Michael T Karwacki; Sangho Kim; Jeffrey L Bose; Kenneth W Bayles; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 7.867

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: a complex developmental organism.

Authors:  Derek E Moormeier; Kenneth W Bayles
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  Using Quantitative Spectrometry to Understand the Influence of Genetics and Nutritional Perturbations On the Virulence Potential of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jessica R Chapman; Divya Balasubramanian; Kayan Tam; Manor Askenazi; Richard Copin; Bo Shopsin; Victor J Torres; Beatrix M Ueberheide
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Evaluation of Antibiotics Active against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Based on Activity in an Established Biofilm.

Authors:  Daniel G Meeker; Karen E Beenken; Weston B Mills; Allister J Loughran; Horace J Spencer; William B Lynn; Mark S Smeltzer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Impact of Environmental Cues on Staphylococcal Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Development.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Kavanaugh; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  RbsR Activates Capsule but Represses the rbsUDK Operon in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Mei G Lei; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 6.  Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis in diverse host environments.

Authors:  Divya Balasubramanian; Lamia Harper; Bo Shopsin; Victor J Torres
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.166

7.  Hyaluronan Modulation Impacts Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Infection.

Authors:  Carolyn B Ibberson; Corey P Parlet; Jakub Kwiecinski; Heidi A Crosby; David K Meyerholz; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Regulatory Requirements for Staphylococcus aureus Nitric Oxide Resistance.

Authors:  Melinda R Grosser; Andy Weiss; Lindsey N Shaw; Anthony R Richardson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Development of an in vitro colonization model to investigate Staphylococcus aureus interactions with airway epithelia.

Authors:  Megan R Kiedrowski; Alexandra E Paharik; Laynez W Ackermann; Annie U Shelton; Sachinkumar B Singh; Timothy D Starner; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 10.  The Staphylococcal Biofilm: Adhesins, Regulation, and Host Response.

Authors:  Alexandra E Paharik; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.