Chee M Chan1, Christian J Woods2, Theodore E Warkentin3, Jo-Ann I Sheppard3, Andrew F Shorr2. 1. Pulmonary and Critical Care Section, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. Electronic address: chee.m.chan@medstar.net. 2. Pulmonary and Critical Care Section, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. 3. Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Program and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin utilization. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is usually performed to assist in the diagnosis of HIT. ELISAs tend to be sensitive but lack specificity. We sought to use a new cutoff to define a positive HIT ELISA. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of hospitalized patients undergoing ELISA testing. All patients who underwent ELISA testing were eligible for inclusion (n = 496). Irrespective of the results, all subjects had confirmatory testing with a serotonin release assay (SRA). We compared a threshold optical density (OD) > 1.00 to the current definition of a positive ELISA (OD > 0.40) as a screening test for a positive SRA. We used sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve to determine whether an OD > 1.00 would improve diagnostic accuracy for HIT. RESULTS: The SRA was positive in 10 patients (prevalence, 2.0%). Adjusting the definition of a positive HIT ELISA to > 1.00 maintained the sensitivity and negative predictive value at 100% in the cohort. The positive predictive value of the higher cutoff OD was more than triple the positive predictive value of an OD > 0.40 (41.7% vs 13.3%). No patient with a positive SRA had an OD measurement ≤ 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the OD threshold enhances specificity without noticeably compromising sensitivity. Altering the definition of the HIT ELISA could prevent unnecessary testing and/or treatment with non-heparin-based anticoagulants in patients with possible HIT. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00946400; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
BACKGROUND:Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin utilization. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is usually performed to assist in the diagnosis of HIT. ELISAs tend to be sensitive but lack specificity. We sought to use a new cutoff to define a positive HIT ELISA. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of hospitalized patients undergoing ELISA testing. All patients who underwent ELISA testing were eligible for inclusion (n = 496). Irrespective of the results, all subjects had confirmatory testing with a serotonin release assay (SRA). We compared a threshold optical density (OD) > 1.00 to the current definition of a positive ELISA (OD > 0.40) as a screening test for a positive SRA. We used sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve to determine whether an OD > 1.00 would improve diagnostic accuracy for HIT. RESULTS: The SRA was positive in 10 patients (prevalence, 2.0%). Adjusting the definition of a positive HIT ELISA to > 1.00 maintained the sensitivity and negative predictive value at 100% in the cohort. The positive predictive value of the higher cutoff OD was more than triple the positive predictive value of an OD > 0.40 (41.7% vs 13.3%). No patient with a positive SRA had an OD measurement ≤ 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the OD threshold enhances specificity without noticeably compromising sensitivity. Altering the definition of the HIT ELISA could prevent unnecessary testing and/or treatment with non-heparin-based anticoagulants in patients with possible HIT. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00946400; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Authors: Anand Padmanabhan; Curtis G Jones; Brian R Curtis; Daniel W Bougie; Mia J Sullivan; Namrata Peswani; Janice G McFarland; Daniel Eastwood; Demin Wang; Richard H Aster Journal: Chest Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Ahmed Aljabri; Yvonne Huckleberry; Jason H Karnes; Mahdi Gharaibeh; Hussam I Kutbi; Yuval Raz; Seongseok Yun; Ivo Abraham; Brian Erstad Journal: Blood Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 22.113