Literature DB >> 25611189

Structure-based design of combinatorial mutagenesis libraries.

Deeptak Verma1, Gevorg Grigoryan, Chris Bailey-Kellogg.   

Abstract

The development of protein variants with improved properties (thermostability, binding affinity, catalytic activity, etc.) has greatly benefited from the application of high-throughput screens evaluating large, diverse combinatorial libraries. At the same time, since only a very limited portion of sequence space can be experimentally constructed and tested, an attractive possibility is to use computational protein design to focus libraries on a productive portion of the space. We present a general-purpose method, called "Structure-based Optimization of Combinatorial Mutagenesis" (SOCoM), which can optimize arbitrarily large combinatorial mutagenesis libraries directly based on structural energies of their constituents. SOCoM chooses both positions and substitutions, employing a combinatorial optimization framework based on library-averaged energy potentials in order to avoid explicitly modeling every variant in every possible library. In case study applications to green fluorescent protein, β-lactamase, and lipase A, SOCoM optimizes relatively small, focused libraries whose variants achieve energies comparable to or better than previous library design efforts, as well as larger libraries (previously not designable by structure-based methods) whose variants cover greater diversity while still maintaining substantially better energies than would be achieved by representative random library approaches. By allowing the creation of large-scale combinatorial libraries based on structural calculations, SOCoM promises to increase the scope of applicability of computational protein design and improve the hit rate of discovering beneficial variants. While designs presented here focus on variant stability (predicted by total energy), SOCoM can readily incorporate other structure-based assessments, such as the energy gap between alternative conformational or bound states.
© 2015 The Protein Society.

Keywords:  cluster expansion; combinatorial library; high-throughput screening; protein design space; structure-based protein design

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25611189      PMCID: PMC4420537          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  69 in total

1.  The penultimate rotamer library.

Authors:  S C Lovell; J M Word; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

2.  Protein design is NP-hard.

Authors:  Niles A Pierce; Erik Winfree
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2002-10

Review 3.  Force fields for protein simulations.

Authors:  Jay W Ponder; David A Case
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

4.  Coarse-graining protein energetics in sequence variables.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Gevorg Grigoryan; Steve R Lustig; Amy E Keating; Gerbrand Ceder; Dane Morgan
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Algorithms for selecting breakpoint locations to optimize diversity in protein engineering by site-directed protein recombination.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Xiaoduan Ye; Alan M Friedman; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf       Date:  2007

6.  The molecular structure of green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  F Yang; L G Moss; G N Phillips
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Random GFP::cDNA fusions enable visualization of subcellular structures in cells of Arabidopsis at a high frequency.

Authors:  S R Cutler; D W Ehrhardt; J S Griffitts; C R Somerville
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A divide-and-conquer approach to determine the Pareto frontier for optimization of protein engineering experiments.

Authors:  Lu He; Alan M Friedman; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-12-16

9.  Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity.

Authors:  Christine E Tinberg; Sagar D Khare; Jiayi Dou; Lindsey Doyle; Jorgen W Nelson; Alberto Schena; Wojciech Jankowski; Charalampos G Kalodimos; Kai Johnsson; Barry L Stoddard; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Comparison of random mutagenesis and semi-rational designed libraries for improved cytochrome P450 BM3-catalyzed hydroxylation of small alkanes.

Authors:  Mike M Y Chen; Christopher D Snow; Christina L Vizcarra; Stephen L Mayo; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 1.650

View more
  8 in total

1.  Depletion of T cell epitopes in lysostaphin mitigates anti-drug antibody response and enhances antibacterial efficacy in vivo.

Authors:  Hongliang Zhao; Deeptak Verma; Wen Li; Yoonjoo Choi; Christian Ndong; Steven N Fiering; Chris Bailey-Kellogg; Karl E Griswold
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2015-05-21

2.  Computationally optimized deimmunization libraries yield highly mutated enzymes with low immunogenicity and enhanced activity.

Authors:  Regina S Salvat; Deeptak Verma; Andrew S Parker; Jack R Kirsch; Seth A Brooks; Chris Bailey-Kellogg; Karl E Griswold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Pareto Optimization of Combinatorial Mutagenesis Libraries.

Authors:  Deeptak Verma; Gevorg Grigoryan; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  EpiSweep: Computationally Driven Reengineering of Therapeutic Proteins to Reduce Immunogenicity While Maintaining Function.

Authors:  Yoonjoo Choi; Deeptak Verma; Karl E Griswold; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

5.  Enriching Peptide Libraries for Binding Affinity and Specificity Through Computationally Directed Library Design.

Authors:  Glenna Wink Foight; T Scott Chen; Daniel Richman; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

6.  Globally deimmunized lysostaphin evades human immune surveillance and enables highly efficacious repeat dosing.

Authors:  Hongliang Zhao; Seth A Brooks; Susan Eszterhas; Spencer Heim; Liang Li; Yan Q Xiong; Yongliang Fang; Jack R Kirsch; Deeptak Verma; Chris Bailey-Kellogg; Karl E Griswold
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Application of fourier transform and proteochemometrics principles to protein engineering.

Authors:  Frédéric Cadet; Nicolas Fontaine; Iyanar Vetrivel; Matthieu Ng Fuk Chong; Olivier Savriama; Xavier Cadet; Philippe Charton
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A machine learning approach for reliable prediction of amino acid interactions and its application in the directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes.

Authors:  Frédéric Cadet; Nicolas Fontaine; Guangyue Li; Joaquin Sanchis; Matthieu Ng Fuk Chong; Rudy Pandjaitan; Iyanar Vetrivel; Bernard Offmann; Manfred T Reetz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.