| Literature DB >> 25610914 |
Mattia Comotto1, Alessandro Alberto Casazza1, Bahar Aliakbarian1, Valentina Caratto2, Maurizio Ferretti2, Patrizia Perego1.
Abstract
The influence of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (pure anatase and 15% N doped anatase) on the growth of Chlorella vulgaris, Haematococcus pluvialis, and Arthrospira platensis was investigated. Results showed that pure anatase can lead to a significant growth inhibition of C. vulgaris and A. platensis (17.0 and 74.1%, resp.), while for H. pluvialis the nanoparticles do not cause a significant inhibition. Since in these stress conditions photosynthetic microorganisms can produce antioxidant compounds in order to prevent cell damages, we evaluated the polyphenols content either inside the cells or released in the medium. Although results did not show a significant difference in C. vulgaris, the phenolic concentrations of two other microorganisms were statistically affected by the presence of titanium dioxide. In particular, 15% N doped anatase resulted in a higher production of extracellular antioxidant compounds, reaching the concentration of 65.2 and 68.0 mg gDB (-1) for H. pluvialis and A. platensis, respectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25610914 PMCID: PMC4291162 DOI: 10.1155/2014/961437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1XRPD spectra of samples of anatase (red) and TiO2 15% N doped anatase (blue) and anatase Pearson's crystal data (green).
Figure 2Transmission electron microscopic image of TiO2 anatase nanoparticles (a, 300x) and TiO2 15% N doped anatase (b, 300x).
Figure 3Effect of TiO2 NPs on the growth of Chlorella vulgaris (a), Arthrospira platensis (b), and Haematococcus pluvialis (c). (gDB L−1 = grams of dried biomass per litre of media).
Effect of different TiO2 NPs on growth and kinetic parameters of different microorganisms.
| Sample |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth inhibition |
| Growth inhibition |
| Growth inhibition |
| |
| (%) | (days−1) | (%) | (days−1) | (%) | (days−1) | |
| Control | — | 0.14 ± 0.00a | — | 0.30 ± 0.01b | — | 0.19 ± 0.00a |
| TiO2 15% N doped | 7.20a | 0.14 ± 0.00a | 6.77a | 0.28 ± 0.02ab | 32.94a | 0.17 ± 0.00a |
| TiO2 anatase | 17.01b | 0.14 ± 0.00a | 18.10a | 0.27 ± 0.01a | 74.09b | 0.07 ± 0.02b |
Means (n = 3) ± standard deviation with different letters (a and b) in the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05).
μ = specific growth rate.
Figure 4The effect of TiO2 NPs on cell morphology showed by phase contrast microscopic images. (a) and (b) show images of Chlorella vulgaris (100x); (c) and (d) show images of Haematococcus pluvialis (40x); (e) and (f) show images of Arthrospira platensis (40x and 100x, resp.). Left columns (a, c, and e) show the images for control tests of each microorganism while right columns (b, d, and f) show images of TiO2 NPs treated microorganisms. Arrow marks indicate the cellular aggregations and cellular wall degradation.
Total polyphenols content both in the medium (extracellular) and inside the cells (intracellular) and polyphenols productivity (υ ) for each kind of photosynthetic microorganism treated with TiO2 NPs.
| Sample |
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extracellular concentration | Intracellular concentration |
| Extracellular concentration | Intracellular concentration |
| Extracellular concentration | Intracellular concentration |
| |
| (mg gDB −1) | (mg gDB −1) | (mg gDB −1) | (mg gDB −1) | (mg gDB −1) | (mg gDB −1) | ||||
| Control | 12.41 ± 1.20a | 4.76 ± 1.14a | 10.14 ± 0.60a | 94.97 ± 7.06b | 2.50 ± 0.91a | 13.02 ± 0.12a | 12.31 ± 0.72a | 5.10 ± 0.14a | 2.26 ± 0.06b |
| TiO2 15% N doped | 11.54 ± 1.60a | 3.71 ± 0.23a | 8.54 ± 0.22a | 65.22 ± 1.59a | 6.60 ± 0.93b | 9.01 ± 0.25b | 67.98 ± 1.97c | 1.30 ± 0.09c | 1.04 ± 0.04c |
| TiO2 anatase | 11.36 ± 0.65a | 3.95 ± 0.34a | 8.31 ± 0.22a | 116.13 ± 3.76c | 2.20 ± 0.24a | 13.01 ± 0.52a | 27.97 ± 5.19b | 3.90 ± 0.82b | 5.87 ± 0.06a |
Means (n = 3) ± standard deviation with different letters (a–c) in the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Mg gDB −1 = milligrams per gram of dried biomass.