| Literature DB >> 25610476 |
Xufang Zhang1, Chen Fan2, Yin Xiao2, Xueli Mao3.
Abstract
Periodontitis is an inflammatory disease that causes osteolysis and tooth loss. It is known that the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signalling pathway plays a key role in the progression of inflammation and osteoclastogenesis in periodontitis. Parthenolide (PTL), a sesquiterpene lactone extracted from the shoots of Tanacetum parthenium, has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory properties in various diseases. In the study reported herein, we investigated the effects of PTL on the inflammatory and osteoclastogenic response of human periodontal ligament-derived cells (hPDLCs) and revealed the signalling pathways in this process. Our results showed that PTL decreased NF-κB activation, I-κB degradation, and ERK activation in hPDLCs. PTL significantly reduced the expression of inflammatory (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) and osteoclastogenic (RANKL, OPG, and M-CSF) genes in LPS-stimulated hPDLCs. In addition, PTL attenuated hPDLC-induced osteoclastogenic differentiation of macrophages (RAW264.7 cells), as well as reducing gene expression of osteoclast-related markers in RAW264.7 cells in an hPDLC-macrophage coculture model. Taken together, these results demonstrate the anti-inflammatory and antiosteoclastogenic activities of PTL in hPDLCs in vitro. These data offer fundamental evidence supporting the potential use of PTL in periodontitis treatment.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25610476 PMCID: PMC4290145 DOI: 10.1155/2014/546097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Primers used in qRT-PCR.
| Gene: | Primers: forward (F) & reverse (R) |
|---|---|
| IL-1 (H) | F: 5′-TTACAGTGGCAATGAGGATGAC-3′ |
| R: 5′-TGCTGTAGTGGTGGTCGGAGA-3′ | |
|
| |
| IL-6 (H) | F: 5′-AGGAGACTTGCCTGGTGAAA-3′ |
| 5′-CAGGGGTGGTTATTGCATCT-3′ | |
|
| |
| TNF- | F: 5′-CCTGGTATGAGCCCATCTATC-3′ |
| R: 5′-GGTTGGATGTTCGTCCTCCTC-3′ | |
|
| |
| RANKL (H) | F: 5′-AGAGCAGAGAAAGCGATGGTG-3′ |
| R: 5′-GAACCAGATGGGATGTCGGT-3′ | |
|
| |
| OPG (H) | F: 5′-CGCTCGTGTTTCTGGACATCT-3′ |
| R: 5′-CACACGGTCTTCCACTTTGC-3′ | |
|
| |
| M-CSF (H) | F: 5′-AGCATGACAAGGCCTGCGTC-3′ |
| R: 5′-AAGCTGTTGTTGCAGTTCTTGC-3′ | |
|
| |
| MMP-2 (H) | F: 5′-CCGTCGCCCATCATCAA-3′ |
| R: 5′-AGATATTGCACTGCCAACTCT-3′ | |
|
| |
| MMP-9 (H) | F: 5′-TCGTGGTTCCAACTCGGTTT-3′ |
| R: 5′-GCGGCCCTCGAAGATGA-3′ | |
|
| |
| 18s (H) | F: 5′-TTCGGAACTGAGGCCATGAT-3′ |
| R: 5′-CGAAC CTCCGACTTCGTTC-3′ | |
|
| |
| RANK (M) | F: 5′-GCAGCTCAACAAGGATACGG-3′ |
| R: 5′-GGTGCAGTTGGTCCAAGGTT-3′ | |
|
| |
| Calcitonin Receptor (M) | F: 5′-CTTAGCTGCCAGAGGGTGAC-3′ |
| R: 5′-TGCAACTTATAGGATCCCGCC-3′ | |
|
| |
| Carbonic Anhydrase II (M) | F: 5′-AGCAGCGAGCAGATGTCTC-3′ |
| R: 5′-TGAGCTGGACGCCAGTTG-3′ | |
|
| |
| MMP-9 (M) | F: 5′-GGGCGTGTCTGGAGATTCG-3′ |
| R: 5′-CACCTGGTTCACCTCATGGTC-3′ | |
|
| |
| Cathepsin K (M) | F: 5′-CCAGTTTTACAGCAGAGGTGTG-3′ |
| R: 5′-CTTGCTTCCCTTCTGGGTG-3′ | |
|
| |
| TRAP (M) | F: 5′-CACTCCCACCCTGAGATTTGT-3′ |
| R: 5′-CATCGTCTGCACGGTTCTG-3′ | |
|
| |
|
| F: 5′-CATACCCAAGAAGGAAGGCTGG-3′ |
| R: 5′-GCTATGTTGCTCTAGACTTCGAGC-3′ | |
Figure 1Effect of PTL on hPDLC proliferation. hPDLCs were exposed to PTL (1, 5, 10, and 20 μM) for 1, 3, and 7 days. Cell proliferation was measured using the MTT assay. The data are expressed as the percentage of the control (containing medium only). Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). * P < 0.05 versus the control.
Figure 2Effects of PTL on signalling pathways in hPDLCs. hPDLCs were pretreated with PTL 1 μM for 1 hour and then stimulated by LPS for 15, 30, and 60 min. Protein abundance was determined by Western blot. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). # P < 0.05 versus the blank group while * P < 0.05 versus the LPS group.
Figure 3Effect of PTL on the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9. (a) Expression of MMP-2; (b) expression of MMP-9. hPDLCs were treated with PTL (1 and 5 μM) for 1 and 3 days and then total protein and RNA were collected. The abundance of proteins was detected by Western blot. GAPDH was included as a loading control. The intensities of the bands were measured with densitometry and first normalized to GAPDH and then further converted to the percentage of the control (containing medium only). Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). # P < 0.05 versus the control while * P < 0.05 versus the LPS group.
Figure 4Effect of PTL on hPDLC gene expression. (a) Expression of inflammatory genes (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α); (b) expression of osteoclastogenic genes (M-CSF, RANKL, and OPG). hPDLCs were treated with PTL (1 and 5 μM) for 1 and 3 days and then total RNA was collected. After RNA extraction, first strand cDNA was synthesized. The cDNA sample was then amplified using qRT-PCR. The expression of the target gene was first normalized to 18S and then further converted to the percentage of the control (containing medium only). Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). # P < 0.05 versus the control while * P < 0.05 versus the LPS group.
Figure 5TRAP staining of osteoclasts cocultured with hPDLCs. (a) TRAP-positive staining in RAW 264.7 cells. TRAP staining of RAW 264.7 cells was performed using assay kit. Images were captured using a Nikon ECLIPSE TS100 microscope with a 10x camera. Representative images are depicted from three patients. (b) Percentage of TRAP-positive MNCs in RAW 264.7 cells. Three randomly selected images were recorded in each treatment group and the number of MNCs was counted. The final data was the average cell number of nine different images from three different patients. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). # P < 0.05 versus the control while * P < 0.05 versus the LPS group.
Figure 6Effect of PTL on osteoclast gene expression. After coculturing with differently treated hPDLCs, total RNA was collected from RAW 264.7 cells. Gene expression was measured by RT-PCR and the expression of the target gene was first normalized to β-actin and then further converted to the percentage of the control (coculture with hPDLCs only). Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). # P < 0.05 versus the control while * P < 0.05 versus the LPS-treated hPDLCs group.
Figure 7The underlying mechanisms of the effects of PTL treatment on hPDLCs and RAW 264.7 cells.