Literature DB >> 25610337

Four new species of hangingflies (Insecta, Mecoptera, Bittacidae) from the Middle Jurassic of northeastern China.

Sulin Liu1, Chungkun Shih1, Dong Ren1.   

Abstract

Two new species of Mongolbittacus Petrulevičius, Huang & Ren, 2007, Mongolbittacusspeciosus sp. n. and Mongolbittacusoligophlebius sp. n., and two new species of Exilibittacus Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012, Exilibittacusfoliaceus sp. n. and Exilibittacusplagioneurus sp. n., in the family Bittacidae, are described and illustrated based on five well-preserved fossil specimens. These specimens were collected from the late Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation of Daohugou, Inner Mongolia, China. These new findings enhance our understanding of the morphological characters of early hangingflies and highlight the diversity of bittacids in the Mid Mesozoic ecosystems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Daohugou; Exilibittacus; Insect fossil; Jiulongshan Formation; Mongolbittacus

Year:  2014        PMID: 25610337      PMCID: PMC4296484          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.466.8047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

, a large family of commonly called hangingflies, live mainly in the temperate or warm tropical climates. The fifth tarsomere of bittacids can be folded against the fourth with the only one claw at pretarsus (Petrulevičius et al. 2007). Since this special tarsi structure is shared by a sister group of (Archibald 2009; Yang et al. 2012a), it is suggested that this morphological character may be PageBreakan apomorphy. So far, there are 16 extant genera with about 270 described extant species (Krzemiński 2007; Yang et al. 2012b). For fossil records, there are 28 genera comprising 52 species as summarized by Li and Ren (2009b). Since then, two genera, Li & Ren, 2009 and Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012, with three species have been described (Li et al. 2009a, Yang et al. 2012b). In addition, up to date, about 20 genera have been described from the Jurassic (Handlirsch 1906, 1939; Ansorge 1993; Tillyard 1933; Ren 1993, 1997; Novokshonov 1993a, 1993b, 1997; Petrulevičius et al. 2007; Li et al. 2008, 2009a; Yang et al. 2012a, 2012b). The age distribution for these fossil genera suggests that the broadest diversity of occurred during the Jurassic, and the earliest fossil record of is Riek, 1955 from the Upper Triassic of Mt. Crosby, Australia (Riek 1955). Until now, 11 fossil genera of from the late Middle Jurassic to the Early Cretaceous have been recorded in China: Ren, 1993 from the Haifanggou Formation; Ren, 1997 and Sukatcheva, 1990 from the Yixian Formation; Handlirsch, 1906 from the Tuodian Formation; Novokshonov, 1993, Petrulevičius, Huang & Ren, 2007, Li, Ren & Shih, 2008, Li, Ren & Shih, 2008, Li & Ren, 2009, Novokshonov, 1997, and Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012, all from the Jiulongshan Formation. A list of 14 species in 11 genera is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.

A list of fossils described from China.

GenusSpeciesLocalityHorizon/Age
Megabittacus Ren, 1997Megabittacus beipiaoensis Ren, 1997Beipiao, LiaoningYixian Fm.,K1
Megabittacus colosseus Ren, 1997Beipiao, LiaoningYixian Fm.,K1
Megabittacus spatiosus Yang, Shih & Ren, 2012Beipiao, LiaoningYixian Fm.,K1
Sibirobittacus Novokshonov, 1993Sibirobittacus atalus Ren, 1997Beipiao, LiaoningYixian Fm., K1
Neorthophlebia Handlirsch, 1906Neorthophlebia yunnanensis Zhang & Hong, 2003Tuodian, YunnanTuodian Fm., J3
Decoribittacus Li & Ren, 2009Decoribittacus euneurus Li & Ren, 2009Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Decoribittacus stictus Li & Ren, 2009Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Exilibittacus Yang, Shih & Ren, 2012Exilibittacus lii Yang, Shih & Ren, 2012Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Exilibittacus plagioneurus sp. n.Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Exilibittacus foliaceus sp. n.Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Formosibittacus Li, Ren & Shih, 2008Formosibittacus macularis Li, Ren & Shih, 2008Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Jurahylobittacus Li, Ren & Shih, 2008Jurahylobittacus astictus Li, Ren & Shih, 2008Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Karattacus Novokshonov, 1997Karattacus longialatus Li & Ren, 2009Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Liaobittacus Ren, 1993Liaobittacus longantennatus Ren, 1993Beipiao, LiaoningHaifanggou Fm., J2
Preanabittacus Novokshonov, 1993Preanabittacus validus Yang, Shih & Ren, 2012Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Mongolbittacus Petrulevičius, Huang & Ren, 2007Mongolbittacus daohugoensis Petrulevičius, Huang & Ren, 2007Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Mongolbittacus speciosus sp. n.Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
Mongolbittacus oligophlebius sp. n.Ningcheng, Inner MongoliaJiulongshan Fm., J2
A list of fossils described from China. Herein we describe four new species of , based on five recently collected fossil specimens from the Jiulongshan Formation of Daohugou, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China. The section at Daohugou Village is composed of grey tuffaceous sandstone and sandy mudstone (Ren et al. 2002). This formation has yielded abundant and diverse insect fossils (Ren et al. 2010), such as (Zhang et al. 2013), (Ren et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2014), (Shih et al. 2010; Li et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2014), (Liu et al. 2012), (Wang et al. 2010) and many others insects (Gao et al. 2012).

Material and methods

The fossil specimens were examined with a Leica M165C dissecting microscope and illustrated with the aid of a camera lucida attached to the microscope; drawings were scanned into a computer by EPSON5100 and were edited with Adobe Photoshop® CS3. Photographs of the specimens and magnified images of the details were taken with a digital camera system attached to the Leica M165C. Specimens were at times treated with ethanol (95%) on the surface to enhance the clarity and contrast. All type specimens are deposited in the Key Lab of Insect Evolution and Environmental Changes, the College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China (CNUB, Ren Dong, Curator). The wing venation nomenclature follows Byers (1979). The term of ‘bittacid cross’ is defined as the crossveins of [R4+5-M1+2, M1+2-M3] (Bechly and Schweigert 2000).

Systematic paleontology

Order Packard, 1886 Infraorder Willmann, 1977 Family Handlirsch, 1906

Petrulevičius, Huang & Ren, 2007

Type species.

Petrulevičius, Huang & Ren, 2007

Included species.

Type species, sp. n., and sp. n.

sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/442F8176-318C-4671-8BA1-83B449A8F4C7 Figs 1 , 2 , 3 , 4
Figure 1.

sp. n., holotype, CNU-MEC-NN2013008 P/C. A photo of part B line drawing of part C photo of counterpart D photo of legs, under alcohol. Scale bars represent 3 mm in A–C, 0.5 mm in D.

Figure 2.

sp. n., holotype, CNU-MEC-NN2013008 P/C. Line drawings of part. A left forewing D right forewing E left hind wing H right hind wing. Line drawings of counterpart B right forewing C left forewing F right hind wing G left hind wing. Scale bars represent 1 mm in A–H.

Figure 3.

sp. n., holotype. A line drawing of forewing, composite of right and left forewings of part and counterpart B line drawing of hind wing, composite of right and left hind wings of part and counterpart. Scale bars represent 1 mm in A–B.

Figure 4.

sp. n., holotype, photos under alcohol and a line drawing. A genitalia in lateral view B head C line drawing of genitalia in lateral view D vein M forking proximad of Rs forking in left forewing E anal field of left forewing; F thorax; Scale bars represent 0.5 mm in A, C, 1 mm in B, D–F. Abbreviations: c, cercus; epi, epiandrium; gx, gonocoxite; prc, procitiger.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is derived from a Latin word of speciosus (showy), highlighting the well-preserved wings in the holotype.

Holotype.

A male specimen well-preserved, CNU-MEC-NN2013008 P/C, part and counterpart. Body 8.8 mm long; forewing 11.3 mm long with a maximal width of 3.0 mm; hind wing 9.1 mm long with a maximal width of 3.0 mm.

Horizon and locality.

Jiulongshan Formation, late Middle Jurassic, Daohugou Village, Shantou Township, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China.

Diagnosis.

In forewing, Sc reaching the anterior margin proximad of the forking of Rs; one crossvein between C and R1; 1A and 2A fusing at base; and 2A sharply curving to the posterior margin.

Description.

A male specimen in lateral view. The head oviform with robust and slender chewing mouthparts. Compound eyes large and oval. Antennae almost complete, filiform, about 6.9 mm long, comprising about twenty antennomeres; the lengths of basal antennomeres almost the same, but several apical antennomeres shorter than the basal ones. Thorax divided into pronotum, mesonotum and metanotum from the lateral view (Figs 1A–C, 4B, F). sp. n., holotype, CNU-MEC-NN2013008 P/C. A photo of part B line drawing of part C photo of counterpart D photo of legs, under alcohol. Scale bars represent 3 mm in A–C, 0.5 mm in D. Legs. Long and slender in lateral view, densely covered with short setae. But all legs fragmented due to poor preservation. Mesocoxa, metacoxa, trochanter visible in lateral view. Mid tibia 4.4 mm; tibial spurs long and sharp. Tarsus with 5 tarsomeres and a single pretarsal claw, but the fifth tarsomere not folded against the fourth as preserved. In addition, the second and third tarsomeres covered with a few small spines (Fig. 1A–D). Forewing. No maculation, base of wing narrow. Sc short, one oblique subcostal crossvein (Scv) between Sc and R1; one crossvein between R1 and C; R1 smooth and reaching the dark pterostigmal area; Rs originating from R1 at an acute angle; one crossvein between R1 and R2+3, one crossvein between R2+3 and R4 and one crossvein between R4 and R5; the ‘bittacid cross’ not aligned, Z-shaped (in side view), and posterior part of ‘the ‘bittacid cross’ distad of the forking of M3+4; M with four branches and bifurcating proximad of the forking of Rs; one crossvein between R5 and M1, one between M1 and M2 and one between M2 and M3; M4 simple, one long and oblique crossvein between M4 and Cu1; Cu1 and M overlapping at base for a short distance; Cu2 curving sharply with a 90° angle, reaching the posterior margin; Cu1 and Cu2 almost parallel, with three crossveins between them, the first oblique crossvein located PageBreakat the base of the wing, the second at the level of Scv, and the third near the sharp bending of Cu2. Veins 1A and 2A fusing at base, 1A reaching the posterior margin proximad of the origination of Rs from R1; two crossveins between 1A and Cu2 (Figs 2A–D, 3A). sp. n., holotype, CNU-MEC-NN2013008 P/C. Line drawings of part. A left forewing D right forewing E left hind wing H right hind wing. Line drawings of counterpart B right forewing C left forewing F right hind wing G left hind wing. Scale bars represent 1 mm in A–H. sp. n., holotype. A line drawing of forewing, composite of right and left forewings of part and counterpart B line drawing of hind wing, composite of right and left hind wings of part and counterpart. Scale bars represent 1 mm in A–B. Hind wing. Sc short, reaching the anterior margin proximad of the forking of Rs; one crossvein between R1 and C; One subcostal crossvein (Scv) between Sc and R1, one crossvein between R1 and R2+3, and one short crossvein between R2+3 and R4; R4 sharply bending upwards, then parallel with R5, one crossvein between them; the ‘bittacid cross’ not aligned, Z-shaped; M forking proximad of the bifurcation of Rs; one crossvein between R5 and M1, one between M1 and M2, one between M2 and M3 and one oblique crossvein between M4 and Cu1; Cu1 and Cu2 almost parallel with two crossveins between them; Cu2 bending sharply with an 90° angle at the level slightly proximad of the forking of M3+4; one crossvein between Cu2 and 1A (Figs 2E–H, 3B). Abdomen. Abdomen 6.5 mm long, with 9 visible segments. The ninth tergum (T9) connecting gonocoxite with dense short setae at the apex, epiandrium well-preserved with long setae on the surface; procitiger and cercus present in lateral view (Figs 1A–C, 4A, C). sp. n., holotype, photos under alcohol and a line drawing. A genitalia in lateral view B head C line drawing of genitalia in lateral view D vein M forking proximad of Rs forking in left forewing E anal field of left forewing; F thorax; Scale bars represent 0.5 mm in A, C, 1 mm in B, D–F. Abbreviations: c, cercus; epi, epiandrium; gx, gonocoxite; prc, procitiger.

Remarks.

sp. n. (Figs 1–4) is assigned to the genus based on the following generic diagnostic characters: R4+5 plus R4 distinctively curved; M4 simple; the ‘bittacid cross’ not aligned; wide posterior anal field; and the forking of M proximad of the Rs forking. sp. n. is distinguished from the other two species of by veins of 1A and 2A fusing at base, and 2A sharply curving to the posterior margin, as shown in the key below. http://zoobank.org/D4B8FBAC-45F0-4A31-B805-108FB33AC7B1 Figs 5 , 6
Figure 5.

sp. n., holotype, CNU-MEC-NN-2013009 P/C. A photo of part B photo of counterpart C anal field of left forewing, under alcohol D photo of a leg, under alcohol E line drawing of right forewing of part. Scale bars represent 3 mm in A–B, 1 mm in C–E.

Figure 6.

sp. n., paratype, CNU-MEC-NN-2013014. A photo B line drawing of part C line drawing of left forewing of part; Scale bars represent 2 mm in A–B, 1 mm in C.

The specific name oligophlebius denotes the wing venation is simple with only a few crossveins. CNU-MEC-NN-2013009 P/C, part and counterpart. Forewing 12 mm long with a maximal width of 3.5 mm.

Paratype.

CNU-MEC-NN-2013014. Jiulongshan Formation, late Middle Jurassic, Daohugou Village, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China. The posterior part of the “bittacid cross’ coinciding with the forking of M3+4; one oblique crossvein between R2+3 and R4 at the bifurcation of R2+3; and length of R3 0.9 times as long as R2+3. Poorly preserved with only one complete forewing and the basal part of one hind wing. But the mid-tibia with two long spurs and five tarsomeres well-preserved, covered by dense short setae (Fig. 5A, B, D). sp. n., holotype, CNU-MEC-NN-2013009 P/C. A photo of part B photo of counterpart C anal field of left forewing, under alcohol D photo of a leg, under alcohol E line drawing of right forewing of part. Scale bars represent 3 mm in A–B, 1 mm in C–E. Forewing. Sc reaching the anterior margin proximad of the forking of Rs, one crossvein between C and R1; one subcostal crossvein (Scv) between Sc and R1; Rs bifurcating into four branches, one crossvein between R1 and R2+3 and one oblique crossvein between R2+3 and R4; Rs arising from R1 at an acute angle; length of R3 0.9 times as long as R2+3; one crossvein between R4 and R5; M with four branches and bifurcating proximad of the forking of Rs; the ‘bittacid cross’ not aligned; the posterior part of the ‘bittacid cross’ coinciding with the forking of M3+4; one crossvein between R5 and M1, one between M1 and M2 and one between M2 and M3; one crossvein between Cu1 and M4, Cu1 and Cu2 parallel with two crossveins between them; one crossvein between Cu2 and 1A; 1A reaching the posterior margin distad of the origination of Rs from R1; 2A bending sharply and reaching the posterior margin, a short crossvein between 1A and 2A (Figs 5C, E, 6C). sp. n., paratype, CNU-MEC-NN-2013014. A photo B line drawing of part C line drawing of left forewing of part; Scale bars represent 2 mm in A–B, 1 mm in C. sp. n. (Figs 5, 6) is assigned to the genus based on the following generic diagnostic characters: R4+5 plus R4 distinctively curved; M4 simple; the ‘bittacid cross’ not aligned; posterior anal field broad; and 2A bending sharply and reaching the posterior margin. This new species is differentiated from and sp. n. by characters as shown in the key below. Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012 Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012. Type species, sp. n., and sp. n.

Emended diagnosis.

Forewing: Sc reaching the anterior margin at the same level or proximad of the forking of R4+5; the ‘bittacid cross’ aligned, the posterior of the ‘bittacid cross’ distad of the bifurcation of M3+4; 1A terminating at the posterior margin at the same level or distad of the origination of Rs from R1. Hind wing: Rs with three or four branches, M with three branches and 2A absent. http://zoobank.org/98FF3AC2-E493-45B7-B351-27B42685200A Fig. 7
Figure 7.

sp. n., holotype, CNU-MEC-NN2013010. A photo B line drawing C line drawing of left forewing D line drawing of left hind wing E photo of genitalia in dorsal view, under alcohol F line drawing of genitalia in dorsal view. Scale bars represent 3 mm in A, B, 2 mm in C, D, 0.5 mm in E, F. Abbreviations: T9, the ninth tergum; T10, the tenth tergum; c, cercus; spa, supraanale.

The Latin word of “foliaceus” means folliform, referring to the shape of the wings like leaves. Female, CNU-MEC-NN2013010, in dorsal view. Body length 12.9 mm, forewing 11.7 mm long and 2.9 mm wide; hind wing 9.7 mm long and 2.6 mm wide. Jiulongshan Formation, late Middle Jurassic, Daohugou Village, Shantou Township, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China. Forewing: pterostigmal crossveins (Pcv) absent, but 2A present. Hind wing: Rs with four branches and the bifurcation of Rs at the same level of the bifurcation of M. A female holotype preserved in dorsal view. Antenna filiform, scape, pedicel and part of other antennomeres preserved. The vertex of the head raised. Legs not well-preserved, covered with short setae; the fifth tarsomere folded against the fourth, a claw present (Fig. 7A, B). sp. n., holotype, CNU-MEC-NN2013010. A photo B line drawing C line drawing of left forewing D line drawing of left hind wing E photo of genitalia in dorsal view, under alcohol F line drawing of genitalia in dorsal view. Scale bars represent 3 mm in A, B, 2 mm in C, D, 0.5 mm in E, F. Abbreviations: T9, the ninth tergum; T10, the tenth tergum; c, cercus; spa, supraanale. Forewing. The base of wings narrow, pterostigma slightly dark. Sc terminating at the anterior margin proximad of the R4+5 forking; one subcostal crossvein (Scv) between Sc and R1; R1 running straight through pterostigma, without sagging; one crossvein between R1 and R2+3; Rs with four branches, R4 slightly curved at beginning and then parallel with R5; one crossvein between R2+3 and R4 and one crossvein between R4 and R5; M with four branches, M3+4 forking far proximad of the bifurcation of M1+2; the ‘bittacid cross’ aligned and gently curved, posterior part of the ‘bittacid cross’ reaching M3 distad of the M3+4 forking point; one crossvein between R5 and M1, one between M1 and M2 and one between M2 and M3; Cu1 and Cu2 almost parallel with two crossveins between them, one crossvein between M4 and Cu1; 1A and 2A simple and one crossvein between them; 1A reaching the posterior margin at the same level of the origination of Rs from R1; 2A reaching the posterior margin at the same level of the origination point of M (Fig. 7C). Hind wing. With the same shape as the forewing. R1 running smoothly through pterostigma; pterostigmal crossveins (Pcv) absent; Rs with four branches; one crossvein between R2+3 and R4 and one between R4 and R5; the ‘bittacid cross’ aligned; M divided into three branches; two crossveins between R5 and M1, one between M1 and M2, one between M2 and M3 and one between M3 and Cu1; Cu1 and Cu2 parallel and with one crossvein between them. Vein 1A reaching the posterior margin at the level slightly proximad of the Rs originating from R1, one crossvein between Cu2 and 1A (Fig. 7D). Abdomen. Abdomen 9.1 mm long, with ten visible segments. Female genital structure well-preserved from the dorsal view. Supraanale and cercus covered with small and short setae (Fig. 7A, B, E, F). sp. n. (Fig. 7) is assigned to the genus Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012 based on the following generic diagnostic characters: in forewing, Sc reaching the anterior margin proximad of the forking of R4+5 and the ‘bittacid cross’ aligned; and in hind wing, Rs with four branches while M with three branches. sp. n. is distinguished from the other two species as shown by the key below. http://zoobank.org/CCEF6E6E-B54D-43CB-8E24-F289597FB4C1 Figs 8 , 9
Figure 8.

sp. n., holotype, CNU-MEC-NN2013013 P/C, dorsal view. A photo of part B photo of counterpart C line drawing of part D photo of a hind leg, under alcohol. Scale bars represent 3 mm in A–C, 1 mm in D.

Figure 9.

sp. n., holotype. Line drawings of part. A right forewing of part B right hind wing of part C left forewing of part D left hind wing of part. Scale bars represent 1 mm in A–D.

From Greek “plagios” (oblique) and “neuron” (vein), referring to oblique crossveins of the wings. Female, CNU-MEC-NN2013013 P/C, in dorsal view. Abdomen length 8.3 mm, forewing length 9.3 mm with a maximal width of 2.3 mm; hind wing length 8.4 mm with a maximal width of 2.2 mm. Jiulongshan Formation, late Middle Jurassic, Daohugou Village, Shantou Township, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China. Forewing Sc terminating at the anterior margin at the same level of the R4+5 forking; Vein 1A terminating at the posterior margin distad of the origination of Rs from R1. Female, small-sized, head not preserved but mesothorax and metathorax preserved. Legs partially preserved, one hind leg with five tarsomeres present but the pretarsal claw not preserved, the fifth tarsomere folded against the fourth; the first and second tarsomeres with several spines. (Fig. 8A–D) sp. n., holotype, CNU-MEC-NN2013013 P/C, dorsal view. A photo of part B photo of counterpart C line drawing of part D photo of a hind leg, under alcohol. Scale bars represent 3 mm in A–C, 1 mm in D. Forewing. Wing narrow basally with obviously dark pterostigma. Sc long, reaching the anterior margin at the same level of the R4+5 forking; R1 not forking, one subcostal crossvein (Scv) between Sc and R1, Scv about 1/6 as long as the Sc length between Scv and the apex of Sc; one pterostigmal crossvein (Pcv) and one crossvein between R1 and R2+3; Rs with four branches, one crossvein between R3 and R4, one between R2+3 and R4 and one between R4 and R5; M with four branches, M4 base bending sharply; the ‘bittacid cross’ aligned, the posterior part of the ‘bittacid cross’ reaching M3 distad of the M3+4 forking point; two crossveins between R5 and M1, one between M1 and M2 and one between M2 and M3; Cu1 ending before the forking of R4+5, one crossvein between M4 and Cu1, one between Cu1 and Cu2; one short PageBreakcrossvein between Cu2 and 1A; 1A terminating at the posterior margin distad of the origination of Rs; 2A ending proximad of the originations of Rs and M, one crossvein between 1A and 2A (Fig. 9A, C). sp. n., holotype. Line drawings of part. A right forewing of part B right hind wing of part C left forewing of part D left hind wing of part. Scale bars represent 1 mm in A–D. Hind wing. Sc short, reaching the anterior margin before the forking of R4+5, one crossvein (Scv) between Sc and R1; R1 smooth and not sagging through the pterostigmal area; one pterostigmal crossvein (Pcv) present. Rs with three branches; one crossvein between R1 and R2, one between R2 and R3 and one between R3 and R4; M with three branches; two crossveins between R4 and M1, one between M1 and M2 and one between M2 and M3; the ‘bittacid cross’ not aligned; one between M3 and Cu1 and one between Cu1 and Cu2. Vein 1A terminating at the posterior margin distad of the origination of Rs, one crossvein between Cu2 and 1A (Fig. 9B, D). Abdomen. Ten segments visible, genital segments not preserved (Fig. 8A–C). sp. n. (Figs 8, 9) is assigned to Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012 based on the following generic diagnostic characters: in forewing, Sc reaching the anterior margin at the same level of the forking of R4+5 and the ‘bittacid cross’ aligned, and in hind wing, M with three branches. The new species is differentiated from and sp. n. by characters shown in the key below.
1Sc reaching the anterior margin proximad of the forking of Rs (Figs 3A, 5E)2
Sc reaching the anterior margin distad of the forking of RsMongolbittacus daohugoensis Petrulevičius, Huang & Ren, 2007
21A and 2A fusing at base (Fig. 3A)Mongolbittacus speciosus sp. n.
A short crossvein between 1A and 2A (Fig. 5E)Mongolbittacus oligophlebius sp. n.
1Rs with four branches in hind wing (Fig. 7D)Exilibittacus foliaceus sp. n.
Rs with three branches in hind wing2
21A terminating at the posterior margin of the forewing distad of the origination of Rs (Fig. 9A)Exilibittacus plagioneurus sp. n.
1A terminating at the posterior margin of the forewing proximad of the origination of RExilibittacus lii Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012
  5 in total

1.  Mid-Mesozoic flea-like ectoparasites of feathered or haired vertebrates.

Authors:  Tai-ping Gao; Chung-kun Shih; Xing Xu; Shuo Wang; Dong Ren
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Ancient pinnate leaf mimesis among lacewings.

Authors:  Yongjie Wang; Zhiqi Liu; Xin Wang; Chungkun Shih; Yunyun Zhao; Michael S Engel; Dong Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Jurassic mimicry between a hangingfly and a ginkgo from China.

Authors:  Yongjie Wang; Conrad C Labandeira; Chungkun Shih; Qiaoling Ding; Chen Wang; Yunyun Zhao; Dong Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A probable pollination mode before angiosperms: Eurasian, long-proboscid scorpionflies.

Authors:  Dong Ren; Conrad C Labandeira; Jorge A Santiago-Blay; Alexandr Rasnitsyn; ChungKun Shih; Alexei Bashkuev; M Amelia V Logan; Carol L Hotton; David Dilcher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  New fossil Lepidoptera (Insecta: Amphiesmenoptera) from the Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation of Northeastern China.

Authors:  Weiting Zhang; Chungkun Shih; Conrad C Labandeira; Jae-Cheon Sohn; Donald R Davis; Jorge A Santiago-Blay; Oliver Flint; Dong Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.