Literature DB >> 25610336

A taxonomic study of the genus Panesthia (Blattodea, Blaberidae, Panesthiinae) from China with descriptions of one new species, one new subspecies and the male of Panesthiaantennata.

Xiudan Wang1, Zongqing Wang1, Yanli Che1.   

Abstract

One new species Panesthiaguizhouensis sp. n. and one new subspecies Panesthiastellataconcava ssp. n. are described and illustrated. The male of Panesthiaantennata Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893 and its brachypterous form are described and illustrated for the first time. Panesthiastrelkovi Bey-Bienko, 1969 is redescribed and illustrated. Three known species, Panesthiabirmanica Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, Panesthiasinuata Saussure, 1839 and Panesthiaangustipenniscognata Bey-Bienko, 1969 are illustrated. In addition, a key to all species of the genus Panesthia from China is presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Salganea; Wing polymorphism; brachypterism; illustration; key

Year:  2014        PMID: 25610336      PMCID: PMC4296483          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.466.8111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

The wood-feeding cockroach genus was established by Serville (1831), belonging to the subfamily of the family . Brunner von Wattenwyl (1893) presented 16 species and Saussure (1895) recorded 33 species in this genus. Bey-Bienko (1969) described three species of this genus from China. More recently, Roth (1977, 1979) recognized 55 species and nine subspecies of worldwide, of which 15 species and two subspecies were reported for the first time. In this latter work, Roth also stated that by Bey-Bienko (1950) from mainland China should be . From then on, no new valid taxon in this genus was published. Asahina (1988) established the subspecies , which was split from the subspecies ; but Maekawa et al. (1999) disagreed with his view based on molecular data. Feng and Woo (1990) reported two species from China, i.e., Feng & Woo, 1990 and Feng & Woo, 1990; the former had been synonymized with Roth, 1979, while the latter was transferred to (Wang et al., 2014). At the same time, they also recorded , and as distributed in China. Up to now, there were 55 species and nine subspecies of reported worldwide, including eight species and two subspecies from China. In this paper, we report one new species and one new subspecies, and also provide a key including nine species and three subspecies of the from China. We also take this opportunity to report the male and the brachypterous form of for the first time.

Materials and methods

The terminology of the head, body and male genitalia used in this paper mainly follows Roth (1977, 1979, 2003). Measurements are based on materials examined. Measurement of body length is without the tegmen. The genital segments of the examined specimens were macerated in 10% NaOH and observed in glycerin jelly using a Motic K400 stereomicroscope. All drawings were made with the aid of a Motic K400 stereomicroscope. Photographs of the specimens were made using a Canon 50D plus a Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro lens with the aid of Helicon Focus software. We considered adults and nymphs collected from the same colony with similar external characters to be one species. Nymphs were identified mainly based on markings on the mesonotum and metanotum as well as their holes in terga, lateral margin of terga and hind margin of supra-anal fig. Type specimens are deposited in the Institute of Entomology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, China (SWU) and the Museum of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei Province, China (HBU). We also borrowed specimens from the Museum of Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China (SWFU) and Dali University, Dali, Yunnan Province, China (DLU) as indicated.

Taxonomy

Family Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1865

Subfamily Kirby, 1904

Serville, 1831 Serville, 1831: 38; Costa, 1866: 5. Type species: Butler, 1882: 387. Type species:
Diagnosis
(mainly following ). Coloration dark reddish brown or black. Size ranging from 15 mm to over 50 mm. Body strongly sclerotized with a coarse surface, densely covered with punctations. Vertex foveolar or not, slightly exposed. Pronotum transversal ovate, anterior margin slightly convex, with a variable excision in the midline, or entire. If excised, the corners of the concavity protruding or not. Lateral margins of pronotum arched and the hind margin almost straight or slightly concave. The surface of the pronotum granular on variably depressed anterior half with a pair of oblique grooves and often with two disc tubercles on the posteriorly punctate half. Tegmina and wings unicoloured or not, fully developed (sometimes mutilated terminally or only leaving the basal portion of the tegmina and wings), or reduced, or tegmina reduced but wings absent, or both tegmina and wings absent. The tarsi of legs with five segments, pulvilli are present on segments 1–4. The hind metatarsus is shorter than the remaining segments combined. Claws symmetrical, without arolia. Abdominal terga with punctate surface, and the hind margins without spines, tubercles or teeth. Anterolateral corners of terga rarely with holes and without setae, or just tergum six (PageBreakPageBreakT6) and tergum seven (T7) with holes. Lateral margins of T6 smooth, and laterocaudal angles not produced, or with a spine and directed caudally. Lateral margins of T7 straight and not crenulate, laterocaudal angles sometimes produced and usually directed caudally. Lateral margins of sternite seven (S7) with a feeble and short ridge or without ridge. In the male, the hind margin of the last sternite is truncate or concave, and the subgenital fig is slightly exposed. In the female, the hind margin of the last sternite is convex and rounded. Both sexes are without styli. Supra-anal fig punctate, with uneven or rounded hind margin, and cerci are short and broad basally. Paraprocts are asymmetrical, the left one in ventral view with a finger-like projection lacking in the right one. Anterior margin and lateral margins of subgenital fig concave and the hind margin is rounded. Four genital phallomeres as follow: first sclerite of the left phallomere (L1) figd; second ventromedial sclerite of left phallomere (L2vm) rod-like; second dorsal sclerite of the left phallomere (L2d) variable; second sclerite of the right phallomere (R2) well developed or reduced, if developed, it is often hook-like and curved to right side in dorsal view.
Remarks.
The genus is recognized by both T6 and T7 having smooth lateral margins, their hind margins without tubercles; the hind angles of T7 spine-like, but T6 not. Some species in this genus may have individuals with mixed characters resembling the genus Stål, 1877, Shaw, 1925 or Saussure, 1895 (Roth 1982: 71). The first two genera can be distinguished from by the anterolateral angles of terga usually with holes or grooves with associated setae, but species of often lack holes, or if with holes in T6 and T7, the holes without setae. The last genus , has a hind metatarsus that is usually close to or longer than the combined length of the remaining tarsal segments; however, the hind metatarsus is shorter than the remaining segments in .
Distribution.
Oriental Region, Australian Region, a few locations in the Palaearctic Region (China, Japan). 1–2 Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, male: 1 dorsal view 2 ventral view 3–4 Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, nymph: 3 dorsal view 4 ventral view 5–6 brachypterous form of Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, male: 5 dorsal view 6 ventral view 7–8 brachypterous form of Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, nymph: 7 dorsal view 8 ventral view 9–10 ssp. n., male: 9 holotype, dorsal view 10 same, ventral view 11–12 ssp. n., nymph: 11 paratype, dorsal view 12 same, ventral view 13–14 sp. n., male: 13 holotype, dorsal view 14 same, ventral view 15–16 sp. n., nymph: 15 paratype, dorsal view 16 same, ventral view. Scale bars = 1.0 cm. 17–18 Bey-Bienko, 1969, male: 17 dorsal view 18 ventral view 19–20 Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, male: 19 dorsal view 20 ventral view 21–22 Saussure, 1895, male: 21 dorsal view 22 ventral view 23–24 Bey-Bienko, 1969, female: 23 dorsal view 24 ventral view 25–26 Bey-Bienko, 1969, nymph: 25 dorsal view 26 ventral view. Scale bars = 1.0 cm. Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893 Figs 1–8 , 27 –38
Figures 1–16.

1–2 Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, male: 1 dorsal view 2 ventral view 3–4 Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, nymph: 3 dorsal view 4 ventral view 5–6 brachypterous form of Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, male: 5 dorsal view 6 ventral view 7–8 brachypterous form of Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, nymph: 7 dorsal view 8 ventral view 9–10 ssp. n., male: 9 holotype, dorsal view 10 same, ventral view 11–12 ssp. n., nymph: 11 paratype, dorsal view 12 same, ventral view 13–14 sp. n., male: 13 holotype, dorsal view 14 same, ventral view 15–16 sp. n., nymph: 15 paratype, dorsal view 16 same, ventral view. Scale bars = 1.0 cm.

Figures 27–36.

Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893 27 vertex and pronotum 28 tegmen 29 hind wing 30 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 31 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 32 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 33 subgenital fig, dorsal view 34 left phallomere (L1) 35 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 36 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 27, 30–33), 2.0 mm (Figs 28–29), 0.5 mm (Figs 34–36).

Figures 37–38.

brachypterous form of Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893 37 tegmen 38 hind wing. Scale bars = 1.0 mm.

Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893: 50;
Description.
Male. Body black or dark brown (Figs 1, 5). Face black with brown eyes, ocelli and upper lip yellowish brown. Antennae black, with apical segments pale yellow. Sternites and legs reddish brown or black, tarsal pulvilli pale (Figs 2, 6). Vertex punctate, with a small foveola in dorsal view, which is exposed to the excision of pronotum in anterior margin (Fig. 27). Face punctulate, ocelli distinct. Pronotum transverse, anterior margin with a U-shaped excision in the middle, lateral corners of the indentation incrassate and upturned; lateral margins convex and the widest point below the middle; hind margin straight; anterior 1/3 of pronotum weakly depressed and the floor granular, with two rounded grooves, remaining surface punctate and with two tubercles medially (Fig. 27). Tegmina and wings fully developed (Figs 28–29) and reaching or extending beyond the end of abdomen (Fig. 1), sometimes mutilated. In brachypterous form, tegmina and wings reduced (Figs 37–38) with tip just reaching the hind margin of segment two to segment four of abdomen (Fig. 5), sometimes mutilated terminally. Caudal edge of the hind wing wave-shaped (Fig. 38). Anterior ventral margin of front femur with 0–2 spines and distal spine absent, hind margin with a large distal spine. Abdominal tergites densely punctate, the punctations denser caudally, anterolateral corners without holes. Caudal angles of T6 rounded; lateral margins of T7 smooth, posteriolateral angles extended caudally and with subacute apex (Fig. 30). Abdominal sternites densely punctate, hind margin of S7 concave (Fig. 31) and subgenital fig slightly exposed. Supra-anal fig densely punctate, the surface coarser than on abdominal tergites; hind margin crenulate, with 7–10 small teeth in middle, caudal angles small, similar to or slightly bigger than the largest one between them (Fig. 32). Cercus fin-shaped, setaceous ventrally, dorsal surface without setae (Fig. 32). Posterior part of subgenital fig flabellate (Fig. 33). Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893 27 vertex and pronotum 28 tegmen 29 hind wing 30 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 31 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 32 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 33 subgenital fig, dorsal view 34 left phallomere (L1) 35 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 36 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 27, 30–33), 2.0 mm (Figs 28–29), 0.5 mm (Figs 34–36). brachypterous form of Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893 37 tegmen 38 hind wing. Scale bars = 1.0 mm. Male genitalia. Genital phallomere L1 well developed but slightly sclerotized (Fig. 34); L2vm rod-like, L2d with an elongate projection at the apex (Fig. 35); R2 developed and hook-shaped (Fig. 36). Female. Similar to male, but hind margin of S7 rounded. In all specimens observed, the anterior margin of pronotum with an excision. In brachypterous form, tegmina and wings also reduced similar to males. Nymph. Body black and punctate, with two yellowish brown marks on the mesonotum and metanotum without marks (Figs 3–4, 7–8). Measurements. Male, body length: 29.1–32.0 mm; pronotum: length/width: 6.5–6.9/9.6–10.5 mm; width of excision of anterior margin of pronotum: 1.7–2.0 mm; distance between disc tubercles: 1.5–2.0 mm; tegmen: 22.7–26.4 mm. In brachypterous form, body length: 28.5–35.5 mm; pronotum: length/width: 6.8–7.1/9.8–11.3 mm; width of excision of anterior margin of pronotum: 2.0–2.5 mm; distance between disc tubercles: 1.9–2.5 mm; tegmen: 13.5–16.7 mm. Female, body length: 29.7–32.6 mm; pronotum: length/width: 6.5–7.0/10.1–10.3 mm; width of excision of anterior margin of pronotum: 1.7–2.0 mm; distance between disc tubercles: 1.9–2.0 mm; tegmen: 23.0–26.8 mm. In brachypterous form, body length: 32.0–32.5 mm; pronotum: length/width: 6.1–7.1/9.6–11.1 mm; width of excision of anterior margin of pronotum: 1.6–2.5 mm; distance between disc tubercles: 2.0–2.4 mm; tegmen: 12.6–16.0 mm.
Material examined.
Two males, two females and one nymph, China: Yunnan Prov., Tengchong County, Mt. Gaoligong, 9 August 2005, coll. Benyong Mao (HBU); 13 males, six females and 32 nymphs, Yunnan Prov., Tengchong County, Lingjiapu, 13–14 August 2006, coll. Biao Liu (SWFU). In brachypterous form, one male and one female, China: Yunnan Prov., Tengchong County, Mt. Gaoligong, Baihualing, 30 July 2012, coll. Jishan Xu and Lingxiao Chang (HBU); two males, two females and one nymph, Yunnan Prov., Longling County, Longxin Village, Mt. Hei, 2300m, 23–25 July 2008, coll. Jishan Xu and Zhenhua Gao (HBU); one male and one female, China: Yunnan Prov., Nanjian County, Mt. Wuliang, 8–9 July 2006, coll. Benyong Mao and Juntong Lang (HBU); one male and one nymph, China: Yunnan Prov., Nanjian County, Mt. Wuliang, 17 July 2003, coll. Benyong Mao (HBU); three males and five nymphs, China: Yunnan Prov., Longchuan County, Mt. Ping, 1800m, 6 November 2003, coll. Jinxin Song (SWFU); one male, China: Yunnan Prov., Lijiang, Snow Mt. Yulong, Yuanbinping, 3228m, 31 October 2007, coll. Biao Liu (SWFU); one male and one female, China: Yunnan Prov., Tengchong County, Dahaoping, 2000m, 3 May 2002, coll. Jinxin Song and Yingxian Situ (SWFU); one male, China: Yunnan Prov., Baoshan City, Baihualing, 1980m, 12 April 2002, coll. Yingxian Situ (SWFU); one male and one nymph, Yunnan Prov., Mt. Wuliang, 2000m, 17 July 2003, coll. Benyong Mao (DLU). China (Yunnan); Myanmar.

ssp. n.

Figs 9–12 , 39–48
Figures 39–48.

ssp. n. 39 vertex and pronotum 40 tegmen 41 hind wing 42 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 43 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 44 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 35 subgenital fig, dorsal view 46 left phallomere (L1) 47 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 48 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 39, 42–45), 2.0 mm (Figs 40–41), 0.5 mm (Figs 46–48).

Male. Body black (Fig. 9). Eyes, ocelli and upper lip yellowish brown. Antennae black, with terminal segments yellow. Legs black, tarsal pulvilli pale yellowish (Fig. 10). Vertex and face punctate, the former exposed and without foveola (Fig. 39). Ocelli small with indefinite borders. Pronotum transverse, anterior margin concave, thickened and with a V- or U-shaped excision in the middle, the corners of the excavation slightly incrassate and upturned; lateral margins rounded with the widest point behind the midline; hind margin almost straight; anterior 1/3 of pronotum depressed with two arched grooves, the surface granular; posterior half densely punctate, with two middle tubercles (Fig. 39). Tegmina and wings well developed (Figs 40–41), extending to or beyond the end of the abdomen (Fig. 9). Anterior ventral margin of front femur with zero, two or four spines (most commonly two) and a small distal spine, hind margin with a large distal spine. Abdominal tergites densely punctate, the anterolateral corners of tergites without hole; caudal angles of T6 rounded; lateral margins of T7 smooth, caudal angles oblique and subacute (Fig. 42). Abdominal sternites densely punctate, hind margin of S7 truncate and rear edge of subgenital fig exposed (Fig. 43). Supra-anal fig roughened and densely punctate, coarser than abdominal tergites; hind margin with 8–10 subobsolete teeth and with margin uneven; lateral angles larger than the medial tooth (Fig. 44). Cercus without setae dorsally, ventral surface convex with dense hairs (Fig. 44). Anterior margin of subgenital fig concave, anterolateral corners rounded; lateral margins concave (Fig. 45). ssp. n. 39 vertex and pronotum 40 tegmen 41 hind wing 42 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 43 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 44 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 35 subgenital fig, dorsal view 46 left phallomere (L1) 47 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 48 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 39, 42–45), 2.0 mm (Figs 40–41), 0.5 mm (Figs 46–48). Male genitalia. Genital phallomere L1 well developed (Fig. 46); L2vm rod-like, L2d short and apex round (Fig. 47); R2 well developed and hook-shaped (Fig. 48). Female. Essentially similar to male, differs with the anterior margin of pronotum weakly concave as well as S7 with rounded hind margin. Nymph. Body black and punctate, with a broad yellow band on the mesonotum which extends to the middle of the metanotum, hind border of the mark concave (Figs 11–12). Measurements. Male, body length: 27.0–32.5 mm; pronotum: length/width: 5.9–7.3/9.4–11.2 mm; width of excision of anterior margin of pronotum: 1.3–2.0 mm; distance between disc tubercles: 1.6–2.1 mm; tegmen: 22.1–26.7 mm. Female, body length: 28.5–32.5 mm; pronotum: length/width: 6.5–7.1/10.3–11.0 mm; width of excision of anterior margin of pronotum: 1.0–1.3 mm; distance between disc tubercles: 1.5–2.0 mm; tegmen: 23.8 mm. Holotype, male, China: Xizang Prov., Chayu County, Shangchayu Town, 8 August 2013, coll. Xinglong Bai and Junsheng Wang (HBU). Paratypes, four males, one female and four nymphs, same data as holotype (HBU); one male, two females and two nymphs, Sichuan Prov., Dege County, Gengqing Town, 3270m, 19 July 2009, coll. Guodong Ren (HBU); one female, China: Xizang Prov., Chayu, 2000m, 24 August 1973, coll. Fusheng Huang (SWU). This subspecies is close to Saussure, 1895, but can be distinguished by the following characteristics: 1) nymph with broad yellowish band on mesonotum and metanotum, nymph of with two yellowish markings on mesonotum and without markings on metanotum; 2) anterior margin of pronotum with an excision in both sexes and the corners of the excision upturned in male; anterior margin of pronotum entire or slightly concave in both sexes of . Feng and Woo (1990) identified the material collected by Fusheng Huang as Saussure, 1895. But after our critical examination, it should be treated as a new subspecies.
Etymology.
The subspecific epithet is derived from the Latin word “concavus” which refers to the hind margin of the yellowish mark on nymphs being concave.

sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/D22FF5CD-A07D-43E6-A7E8-0EDBAAEC0CFC Figs 13–16 , 49–58
Figures 49–58.

sp. n. 49 vertex and pronotum 50 tegmen 51 hind wing 52 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 53 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 54 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 55 subgenital fig, dorsal view 56 left phallomere (L1) 57 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 58 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 49–55), 0.5 mm (Figs 56–58).

Male. Body dark brown or black (Fig. 13). Face black, eyes brown or black, ocelli pale yellowish and upper lip yellowish brown. Antennae black, terminal segments light brown. Abdominal sternites reddish brown with the middle of anterior three sternites brown (Fig. 14). Legs reddish brown with coxae and trochanter brown, tarsal pulvilli pale (Fig. 14). Vertex slightly punctate, exposed (Fig. 49). Face punctulate, ocelli small, round. Pronotum transverse ovate and flat; anterior margin convex or straight, center weakly concave, lateral corners of the indentation slightly incrassate and upturned; lateral margins convex and widest at or before the midline; hind margin straight; anterior 1/3 of pronotum shallowly depressed and delineated by two grooves, the surface sparsely granular; posterior half flattened and punctate densely, with two small disc tubercles (Fig. 49). Tegmina and wings well developed (Figs 50–51), extending to or surpassing the tip of abdomen (Fig. 13), few reaching to the hind margin of 6th tergite, sometimes mutilated terminally. Anterior ventral margin of front femur with 0–1 spine and with a small distal spine, hind margin with a large distal spine. Abdominal tergites punctate, with punctations denser caudally, anterolateral corners without holes. Caudal angles of 6th tergite weakly extended; lateral margins of 7th tergite smooth, caudal angles acute and directed caudally (Fig. 52). Abdominal sternites punctate, hind margin of the 7th sternite weakly concave and subgenital fig exposed (Fig. 53). Supra-anal fig punctate densely, hairless, hind margin smooth or slightly concave in the middle in dorsal view, with 5–7 small teeth medially or smooth in ventral view, caudal angles small (Fig. 55). Cercus fin-shaped with acute apex, dorsal surface without setae and hairy ventrally (Fig. 54). Hind margin of subgenital fig rounded (Fig. 55). sp. n. 49 vertex and pronotum 50 tegmen 51 hind wing 52 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 53 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 54 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 55 subgenital fig, dorsal view 56 left phallomere (L1) 57 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 58 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 49–55), 0.5 mm (Figs 56–58). Male genitalia. Genital phallomere well developed, L1 well sclerotized (Fig. 56); L2vm rod-like, L2d elongate (Fig. 57); R2 hook-shaped (Fig. 58). Female. Differs from male as follows: the anterior margin of pronotum weakly concave and the corners not upturned; the tubercles on surface smaller than in male. Hind margin of S7 rounded. Nymph. Body black and punctuate, with two yellowish brown marks on the mesonotum and metanotum without marks (Figs 15–16). Measurements. Male, body length: 24.5–27.0 mm; pronotum: length/width: 4.2–5.2/ 7.9–9.0 mm; width of excision of anterior margin of pronotum: 1.5–1.8 mm; distance between disc tubercles: 1.1–1.5 mm; tegmen: 22.0–25.6 mm. Female, body length: 26.8–31.5 mm; pronotum: length/width: 4.5–5.0/8.5–9.0 mm; width of excision of anterior margin of pronotum: 1.1–1.3 mm; distance between disc tubercles: 1.3–1.5 mm; tegmen: 21.2–23.2 mm. Holotype, male, China: Guizhou Prov., Zunyi City, Suiyang County, Kuankuoshui Natural Reserve, 14 August 2010, coll. Keliang Wu (SWU). Paratypes, five males, two females and five nymphs, same data as holotype (SWU); four males, 12 females and 13 nymphs, Guizhou Prov., Zunyi City, Suiyang County, Kuankuoshui Natural Reserve, 1–2 August 2013, coll. Xiudan Wang and Yuhong Zheng (SWU). This species is similar to , but can be distinguished by the following characteristics: 1) anterior margin of pronotum weakly concave in male, and without mesal elevation, male of latter with anterior margin broadly excised and with mesal elevation; 2) body length < 30 mm in most, or few surpassing 30 mm, body length of > 30 mm. The specific epithet is named after the locality of the holotype, Guizhou Province. Bey-Bienko, 1969 Figs 17–18 , 59–67
Figures 17–26.

17–18 Bey-Bienko, 1969, male: 17 dorsal view 18 ventral view 19–20 Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, male: 19 dorsal view 20 ventral view 21–22 Saussure, 1895, male: 21 dorsal view 22 ventral view 23–24 Bey-Bienko, 1969, female: 23 dorsal view 24 ventral view 25–26 Bey-Bienko, 1969, nymph: 25 dorsal view 26 ventral view. Scale bars = 1.0 cm.

Figures 59–67.

Bey-Bienko, 1969 59 vertex and pronotum 60 tegmen 61 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 62 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 63 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 64 subgenital fig, dorsal view 65 left phallomere (L1) 66 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 67 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 59, 61–62), 0.5 mm (Figs 60, 63–67).

Bey-Bienko, 1969: 834; Male. Body black (Fig. 17). Face black, eyes and ocelli brown, upper lip yellowish brown, antennae black with brownish apex. Legs dark brown, coxae and trochanter reddish brown (Fig. 18). Face punctulate, with weak ocelli; vertex slightly exposed (Fig. 59). Pronotum nearly semicircular, the widest near the truncate hind margin (Fig. 59). Anterior margin convex and incrassate, slightly concave in the middle, with two upturned tubercles (Fig. 59). Anterior half of pronotum depressed, the surface granular; posterior part punctate and elevated, with two tubercles on disc (Fig. 59). Tegmina reduced to sclerotized blades (Fig. 60) which are far separated on the lateral sides of the mesonotum respectively, with apex slightly surpassing hind margin of mesonotum; wings absent (Fig. 17). Anterior ventral margin of front femur with 2–3 spines and with one small distal spine, hind margin with one large distal spine. Abdominal tergites densely punctate, with punctures denser and larger caudally; lateral margins smooth; anterolateral corners without holes. PageBreakPageBreakT6 with small spine in the each hind angle, T7 with relatively large posteriolateral angles, with apexes acute and directed to the terminus (Fig. 61). Abdominal sternites equally punctate. Lateral margins of S7 oblique and protruded medially; hind margin straight (Fig. 62) and subgenital fig marginally exposed. The surface of supra-anal fig uniformly covered with large round punctations; hind margin with 5–7 small subacute teeth medially; the lateral teeth with acute apexes are larger than the teeth between them (Fig. 63). Cercus fin-shaped and pointed apically, swollen and hirsute in venter, but hairless dorsally (Fig. 63). Anterior angles of subgenital fig tapering to subacute apexes (Fig. 64). Bey-Bienko, 1969 59 vertex and pronotum 60 tegmen 61 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 62 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 63 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 64 subgenital fig, dorsal view 65 left phallomere (L1) 66 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 67 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 59, 61–62), 0.5 mm (Figs 60, 63–67). Male genitalia. L1 well developed (Fig. 65); L2vm stick-like and L2d slightly sclerotized, which is hairy in left side of dorsal view (Fig. 66); R2 hook-shaped with apex rounded (Fig. 67). Measurements. Male, body length: 29.0–37.0 mm; pronotum: length/width: 7.2–8.2/10.0–13.0 mm; width of excision of anterior margin of pronotum: 1.0–1.7 mm; distance between disc tubercles: 2.0–2.5 mm; tegmen: 3.6–5.5 mm. Two males, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Diaoluo, 12 May 1965, coll. Sikong Liu; one male, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, 17 April 1982, coll. Zhiqin Chen. (SWU) China (Hainan). Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893 Figs 19–20 , 68–73
Figures 68–73.

Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, female 68 vertex and pronotum 69 tegmen 70 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 71 hind wing 72 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 73 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view. Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 68–72), 0.5 mm (Fig. 73).

Brunner, 1893: 54; This species is distinguished from other species by its small body length, ranging from 22.5 mm to 28 mm; and also by pronotum virtually flattened, anterior margin slightly thickened, entire or weakly indented in male, entire and not thickened in female (Fig. 68); as well as the caudal angles of T7 acute and posteriorly directed (Fig. 71); hind margin of supra-anal fig smooth or slightly crenulate, with the lateral teeth acute in apexes (Fig. 73); anterior ventral margin of front femur with 0–3 spines and with small distal spine, and posterior ventral margin with a large distal spine. The caudal angles of T6 sometimes with an acute spine separately may confuse this species with species in the genus , but can be distinguished by the shorter hind metatarsus, as stated in the genus remarks. Roth (1979) determined that the tegmina and wings were polymorphic in this species since the specimens he examined had both the macropterous and brachypterous forms. The tegmina and wings are fully developed (Figs 19, 69–70) or mutilated on all material of this species we examined. Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893, female 68 vertex and pronotum 69 tegmen 70 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 71 hind wing 72 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 73 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view. Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 68–72), 0.5 mm (Fig. 73). One female, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, Tianchi, 6 July 1981, collector unknown; one female, China: Hainan Prov., Changjiang, Mt. Bawangling, 8–13 July 2006, coll. Jiliang Wang and Chao Gao; three females, China: Yunnan Prov., Xishuangbanna, Dadugang, 27 April 2014, Xinran Li. (SWU). China (Hainan, Yunnan); India; Myanmar; Vietnam; Thailand. Saussure, 1895 Figs 21–22 , 74–83
Figures 74–83.

Saussure, 1895 74 vertex and pronotum 75 tegmen 76 hind wing 77 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 78 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 79 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 80 subgenital fig, dorsal view 81 left phallomere (L1) 82 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 83 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 74–78), 0.5 mm (Figs 79–83).

Saussure, 1895: 318; This species is similar to , but can be distinguished by body length (19–29 mm), which is commonly smaller than the latter (34–42 mm). In male of , the anterior margin of pronotum is broadly concave and the corners of the indentation upturned (Fig. 74), while the latter is merely concave and without corners in small individuals about 34 mm. The anteroventral margin of front femur often bears 0–1 spine in , but more than two spines in . Roth (1979) described this species as similar to , but the male of the latter had no mesal elevation of the anterior margin of pronotum. Saussure, 1895 74 vertex and pronotum 75 tegmen 76 hind wing 77 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 78 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 79 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 80 subgenital fig, dorsal view 81 left phallomere (L1) 82 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 83 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 1.0 mm (Figs 74–78), 0.5 mm (Figs 79–83). Two males and one female, China: Yunnan Prov., Xishuangbanna, Menghai, 1200–1600m, 26 July 1958, coll. Shuyong Wang; one male, China: Yunnan Prov., Xishuangbanna, 1050–1080m, 9 June 1958, coll. Fuji Pu. (SWU) China (Yunnan, Guangdong); Vietnam; Laos; Malaysia. Bey-Bienko, 1969 Figs 23–26 , 84–93
Figures 84–93.

Bey-Bienko, 1969 84 vertex and pronotum 85 tegmen 86 hind wing 87 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 88 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 89 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 90 subgenital fig, dorsal view 91 left phallomere (L1) 92 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 93 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 2.0 mm (Figs 84–90), 0.5 mm (Figs 91–93).

Bey-Bienko, 1969: 833; , This subspecies resembles , and it is difficult to distinguish adults. Roth (1979) stated had a deflexed hind margin of the supra-anal fig and appeared to be entire dorsally, not deflexed and with teeth visible dorsally in . Despite this character being variable, some of the populations were sufficiently different, and distinct on average. It is significant that L2d of median phallomere in is short with variable apex, but elongate and tapering to a round apex in . Nymphs of have a broadly yellowish marking on mesonotum and metanotum (Fig. 25) while is with or without two markings on mesonotum, and without any markings on metanotum. Bey-Bienko, 1969 84 vertex and pronotum 85 tegmen 86 hind wing 87 abdominal tergum 7, dorsal view 88 abdominal sternite 7, ventral view 89 supra-anal fig and paraprocts, ventral view 90 subgenital fig, dorsal view 91 left phallomere (L1) 92 median phallomere (L2vm and L2d) 93 right phallomere (R2). Scale bars = 2.0 mm (Figs 84–90), 0.5 mm (Figs 91–93). One nymph, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, 29 June 1981, coll. Kegang Hu; one nymph, China: Hainan Prov., Ledong County, 25 December 1963, coll. Yuliang Luo; one nymph, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, Tianchi, 24 February 1982, Ruilin Pan; one female, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, 24 November 1981, Ruilin Pan; one nymph, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, 8 July 1981, collector unknown; one nymph, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, Tianchi, 8–10 May 1964, coll. Hui Ren; one nymph, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, 11 May 1981, collector unknown; one female, China: Hainan Prov., Ledong County, Mt. Jianfengling, 1050m, 6–7 December 2007, coll. Weiwei Zhang; one female, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, Tianchi, 26 July 1983, coll. Lishen Hua; one nymph, China: Hainan Prov., Wanning City, Xinglong, 23 February 1964, coll. Sikong Liu; one female, China: Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling, 9 May 1964, coll. Sikong Liu; one nymph, China: Yunnan Prov., Menglun, 1 August 2009, coll. Zongqing Wang; one nymph, China: Yunnan Prov., Yingjiang County, Tongbiguan, 1450m, 30 July 2009, coll. Benyong Mao; one male, China: Guizhou Prov., Liping County, Mt. Taiping, 27 July 2009, coll. Yang; two males, one female and one nymph, China: Xizang Prov., Motuo, 1100m, 5 January 1983, coll. Yinheng Han; one female, China: Xizang Prov., Motuo, 700-1050m, 23 June 1983, coll. Yinheng Han; one male, China: Xizang Prov., Chayu County, Songgu, 23 July 1972, coll. Fusheng Huang. (SWU). One male, one female and one nymph, China: Guangxi Prov., Hechi City, Tian'e County, 14–19 September 2002, coll. Ming Bai. (HBU) China (Hainan, Guangxi, Guizhou, Yunnan, Xizang); India; Sikkim; Myanmar; Vietnam; Laos; Thailand.

Discussion

Gregarious, xylophagous cockroaches of the blaberid genus exhibit little variation in morphology. They have dark, hard, rigid and pitted exoskeletons. Body sizes range from 15 mm to over 50 mm. They usually live in decaying wood, fallen leaves, rubbish, cracks in rocks, or in some kind of debris, and feed on wood (Feng and Woo 1990). Members of live not only inside decaying logs but also under logs (Rugg and Rose 1989). During our collection in Guizhou Province in August, 2013, we obtained a colony of sp. n. from rotten wood near a large pool, comprised of 52 adults and at least 60 nymphs of different instars. When the wood was split, all of them fled away quickly (Wang X.D., pers. obs.). Nymphs of have two morphs. One has a pair of large reddish spots on mesonotum (Roth 1979: Fig. 20B) and is from Taiwan, China and Yayeyama Island, Japan. The other is uniformly colored without spots on mesonotum (Roth 1979: Fig. 20A) and is from Taiwan and Japan except Yayeyama Island. Asahina (1988) separated from in view of the nymph having a reddish marked mesonotum. Maekawa et al. (1999) analyzed the molecular phylogenetic relationships of and based on the COII gene. formed a monophyletic clade, which was embedded in the clade of ; this suggests should be returned to . After examination of a large quantity of nymphs of , we think it is not reasonable and adequate to accurately distinguish subspecies only according to the difference in marks of the nymph. For example, there are also different nymph morphs in (Roth 1979: Figs 2B–K). Therefore, we hereby agree with the decision by Maekawa et al. (1999) that should be treated as the synonym of . is the only genus of the subfamily in which several species and subspecies have tegmina and wings which are fully developed or variably reduced (Roth 1982), i.e., include wing polymorphic species. There are five species and four subspecies of with variable reduction of tegmina and wings in both sexes (Roth 1982). From a , which was recorded with mutilated tegmina and wings, Roth (1979) inferred that a developed winged morph may have existed. But after checking specimens collected from Yunnan Province, we have identified and discovered 15 males and eight females of with tegmina and wings about or beyond the end of abdomen, and 11 males and five females with tegmina and wings apparently short, only reaching between the second segment and the fourth segment of the abdomen. Given the above, can also be treated as a wing polymorphic species. The reason for wing polymorphism in cockroaches is still unknown. Roth (1977, 1979) observed that some species of PageBreak with reduced-wing forms were not commonly collected. We record 16 adult specimens of in brachypterous form collected (39 specimens in all). To be unambiguous, this brachypterous form does not just occur by accident or gene mutation in rare specimens, but rather in large numbers. Species with both macropterous and brachypterous forms possess a higher fitness (Roff, 1986) and this seems reasonable in as well. However further investigation will be required to confirm this reasoning.
1Tegmina and wings absentPanesthia larvata
Tegmina and wings present, or tegmina present and wings absent2
2Tegmina reduced (Fig. 17) and wings absentPanesthia strelkovi
Tegmina and wings well developed or reduced3
3Tegmina with more than one colour in the form of spotsPanesthia transversa
Tegmina unicoloured without spots4
4Laterocaudal angles of T6 acute and posteriorly directedPanesthia birmanica
Laterocaudal angles of T6 not acute5
5Anterior margin of pronotum broadly excavated and with a projection mesally in male, slightly concave and without projection in female6
Anterior margin of pronotum slightly concave and without middle projection in both sexes8
6Body length < 30 mm, anteroventral margin of front femur with 0–1 spinePanesthia sinuata
Body length > 30 mm, anteroventral margin of front femur with two spines or more (Panesthia angustipennis complex)7
7Hind margin of supra-anal fig entire dorsally or weakly undulate; median phallomere L2d elongate, tapering to a round apex (Roth 1979: Figs 19J, 20C–G)Panesthia angustipennis spadica
Hind margin of supra-anal fig undulate dorsally; median phallomere L2d short with variable apex (Fig. 92; Roth 1979: Figs 21H, 22E, 23A–X)Panesthia angustipennis cognata
8Hind margin of supra-anal fig slightly crenate in ventral view (Fig. 89) and entire in dorsal viewPanesthia guizhouensis sp. n.
Hind margin of supra-anal fig crenulate in ventral and dorsal view9
9Vertex with a foveola in dorsal view (Fig. 27), and teeth on supra-anal fig with smooth border (Fig. 32)Panesthia antennata
Vertex without foveola (Fig. 39), and teeth on supra-anal fig with uneven border (Fig. 44)Panesthia stellata concava ssp. n.
  2 in total

1.  Molecular phylogeny and geographic distribution of wood-feeding cockroaches in East Asian Islands.

Authors:  K Maekawa; N Lo; O Kitade; T Miura; T Matsumoto
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Revision of the genus Salganea Stål (Blattodea, Blaberidae, Panesthiinae) from China, with descriptions of three new species.

Authors:  Xiudan Wang; Yan Shi; Zongqing Wang; Yanli Che
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 1.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.