Literature DB >> 25609862

Life cycle costing as a decision making tool for technology acquisition in radio-diagnosis.

Abhijit Chakravarty1, Jyotindu Debnath2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Life cycle costing analysis is an emerging conceptual tool to validate capital investment in healthcare.
METHODS: A preliminary study was done to analyze the long-term cost impact of acquiring a new 3 T MRI system when compared to technological upgradation of the existing 1.5 T MRI system with a view to evolve a decision matrix for correct investment planning and technology management. Operating costing method was utilized to estimate cost per unit MRI scan, costing inputs were considered for the existing 1.5 T and the proposed 3 T machine. Cost for each expected year in the life span of both 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scan options were then discounted to its Net Present Value. Net Present Value thus calculated for both the alternative options of 1.5 T and 3 T MRI machine was charted along with various intangible but critical Figures of Merit (FOM) to create a decision matrix for capital investment planning. RESULT: Considering all fixed and variable costs contributing towards assumed operation, unit cost per MRI procedure was found to be Rs. 4244.58 for the 1.5 T upgrade and Rs. 6059.37 for the new 3 T MRI machine. Life Cycle Cost Analysis of the proposed 1.5 T upgrade and new 3 T machine showed a Net Present Value of Rs. 42,148,587.80 and Rs. 27,587,842.38 respectively.
CONCLUSION: The utility of life cycle costing as a strategic decision making tool towards evaluating alternative options for capital investment planning in health care environment is reiterated.

Keywords:  1.5 T/3 T MRI; Life cycle costing; Radiodiagnosis; Technology acquisition

Year:  2014        PMID: 25609862      PMCID: PMC4297844          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  3 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Will Brindle; Ana M Casado; Kirsten Shuler; Moira Henderson; Brenda Thomas; Jennifer Macfarlane; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Katherine Lymer; Zoe Morris; Cyril Pernet; William Nailon; Trevor Ahearn; Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni; Carlos Mugruza; John McLean; Goultchira Chakirova; Yuehui Terry Tao; Johanna Simpson; Andrew C Stanfield; Harriet Johnston; Jehill Parikh; Natalie A Royle; Janet De Wilde; Mark E Bastin; Nick Weir; Andrew Farrall; Maria C Valdes Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Economic evaluation and health care. What does it mean?

Authors:  R Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-11

3.  Diagnostic relevance of high field MRI in clinical neuroradiology: the advantages and challenges of driving a sports car.

Authors:  Mike P Wattjes; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Technology acquisition in radiodiagnosis: Pros and cons.

Authors:  R Ravikumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-02-16

2.  Letter to the editor.

Authors:  Giriraj Singh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-04

3.  Life cycle costing of MRI machine at a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Authors:  Anupam Sahu; H Vikas; Nishant Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.