Literature DB >> 25609815

A trans-dominant form of Gag restricts Ty1 retrotransposition and mediates copy number control.

Agniva Saha1, Jessica A Mitchell1, Yuri Nishida1, Jonathan E Hildreth1, Joshua A Ariberre2, Wendy V Gilbert2, David J Garfinkel3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus lack the conserved RNA interference pathway and utilize a novel form of copy number control (CNC) to inhibit Ty1 retrotransposition. Although noncoding transcripts have been implicated in CNC, here we present evidence that a truncated form of the Gag capsid protein (p22) or its processed form (p18) is necessary and sufficient for CNC and likely encoded by Ty1 internal transcripts. Coexpression of p22/p18 and Ty1 decreases mobility more than 30,000-fold. p22/p18 cofractionates with Ty1 virus-like particles (VLPs) and affects VLP yield, protein composition, and morphology. Although p22/p18 and Gag colocalize in the cytoplasm, p22/p18 disrupts sites used for VLP assembly. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) affinity pulldowns also suggest that p18 and Gag interact. Therefore, this intrinsic Gag-like restriction factor confers CNC by interfering with VLP assembly and function and expands the strategies used to limit retroelement propagation. IMPORTANCE: Retrotransposons dominate the chromosomal landscape in many eukaryotes, can cause mutations by insertion or genome rearrangement, and are evolutionarily related to retroviruses such as HIV. Thus, understanding factors that limit transposition and retroviral replication is fundamentally important. The present work describes a retrotransposon-encoded restriction protein derived from the capsid gene of the yeast Ty1 element that disrupts virus-like particle assembly in a dose-dependent manner. This form of copy number control acts as a molecular rheostat, allowing high levels of retrotransposition when few Ty1 elements are present and inhibiting transposition as copy number increases. Thus, yeast and Ty1 have coevolved a form of copy number control that is beneficial to both "host and parasite." To our knowledge, this is the first Gag-like retrotransposon restriction factor described in the literature and expands the ways in which restriction proteins modulate retroelement replication.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25609815      PMCID: PMC4403431          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.03060-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  93 in total

1.  The TY3 Gag3 spacer controls intracellular condensation and uncoating.

Authors:  Kristina Clemens; Liza Larsen; Min Zhang; Yurii Kuznetsov; Virginia Bilanchone; Arlo Randall; Adam Harned; Rhonda Dasilva; Kunio Nagashima; Alexander McPherson; Pierre Baldi; Suzanne Sandmeyer
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  BUD22 affects Ty1 retrotransposition and ribosome biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Arun Dakshinamurthy; Katherine M Nyswaner; Philip J Farabaugh; David J Garfinkel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Efficient homologous recombination of Ty1 element cDNA when integration is blocked.

Authors:  G Sharon; T J Burkett; D J Garfinkel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Inferences of evolutionary relationships from a population survey of LTR-retrotransposons and telomeric-associated sequences in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex.

Authors:  Gianni Liti; Antonella Peruffo; Steve A James; Ian N Roberts; Edward J Louis
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.239

5.  Chromatin-associated genes protect the yeast genome from Ty1 insertional mutagenesis.

Authors:  Katherine M Nyswaner; Mary Ann Checkley; Ming Yi; Robert M Stephens; David J Garfinkel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  The population biology and evolutionary significance of Ty elements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  C M Wilke; E Maimer; J Adams
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling.

Authors:  Nicholas T Ingolia; Sina Ghaemmaghami; John R S Newman; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  RNA degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisae.

Authors:  Roy Parker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Positional cloning of the mouse retrovirus restriction gene Fv1.

Authors:  S Best; P Le Tissier; G Towers; J P Stoye
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Protein kinase A regulates gene-specific translational adaptation in differentiating yeast.

Authors:  Pavanapuresan P Vaidyanathan; Boris Zinshteyn; Mary K Thompson; Wendy V Gilbert
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.942

View more
  40 in total

Review 1.  The challenges of predicting transposable element activity in hybrids.

Authors:  Mathieu Hénault
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 2.  Repetitive DNA loci and their modulation by the non-canonical nucleic acid structures R-loops and G-quadruplexes.

Authors:  Amanda C Hall; Lauren A Ostrowski; Violena Pietrobon; Karim Mekhail
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 4.197

Review 3.  Border collies of the genome: domestication of an autonomous retrovirus-like transposon.

Authors:  M Joan Curcio
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  Ty1 escapes restriction by the self-encoded factor p22 through mutations in capsid.

Authors:  Jessica M Tucker; David J Garfinkel
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2016-03-07

Review 5.  Measuring and interpreting transposable element expression.

Authors:  Sophie Lanciano; Gael Cristofari
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  Co-option of endogenous viral sequences for host cell function.

Authors:  John A Frank; Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 7.090

7.  Reliance of Host-Encoded Regulators of Retromobility on Ty1 Promoter Activity or Architecture.

Authors:  Alicia C Salinero; Simey Emerson; Tayla C Cormier; John Yin; Randall H Morse; M Joan Curcio
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-07-01

8.  The effect of hybridization on transposable element accumulation in an undomesticated fungal species.

Authors:  Mathieu Hénault; Souhir Marsit; Guillaume Charron; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  A self-encoded capsid derivative restricts Ty1 retrotransposition in Saccharomyces.

Authors:  David J Garfinkel; Jessica M Tucker; Agniva Saha; Yuri Nishida; Katarzyna Pachulska-Wieczorek; Leszek Błaszczyk; Katarzyna J Purzycka
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  Characterizing the functions of Ty1 Gag and the Gag-derived restriction factor p22/p18.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pachulska-Wieczorek; Leszek Błaszczyk; Julita Gumna; Yuri Nishida; Agniva Saha; Marcin Biesiada; David J Garfinkel; Katarzyna J Purzycka
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.