Literature DB >> 25609805

Antibody titer has positive predictive value for vaccine protection against challenge with natural antigenic-drift variants of H5N1 high-pathogenicity avian influenza viruses from Indonesia.

David E Swayne1, David L Suarez2, Erica Spackman2, Samadhan Jadhao2, Gwenaelle Dauphin3, Mia Kim-Torchetti3, James McGrane4, John Weaver4, Peter Daniels5, Frank Wong5, Paul Selleck5, Agus Wiyono6, Risa Indriani6, Yuni Yupiana7, Elly Sawitri Siregar8, Teguh Prajitno9, Derek Smith10, Ron Fouchier11.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Vaccines are used in integrated control strategies to protect poultry against H5N1 high-pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI). H5N1 HPAI was first reported in Indonesia in 2003, and vaccination was initiated in 2004, but reports of vaccine failures began to emerge in mid-2005. This study investigated the role of Indonesian licensed vaccines, specific vaccine seed strains, and emerging variant field viruses as causes of vaccine failures. Eleven of 14 licensed vaccines contained the manufacturer's listed vaccine seed strains, but 3 vaccines contained a seed strain different from that listed on the label. Vaccines containing A/turkey/Wisconsin/1968 (WI/68), A/chicken/Mexico/28159-232/1994 (Mex/94), and A/turkey/England/N28/1973 seed strains had high serological potency in chickens (geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition [HI] titers, ≥ 1:169), but vaccines containing strain A/chicken/Guangdong/1/1996 generated by reverse genetics (rg; rgGD/96), A/chicken/Legok/2003 (Legok/03), A/chicken/Vietnam/C57/2004 generated by rg (rgVN/04), or A/chicken/Legok/2003 generated by rg (rgLegok/03) had lower serological potency (geometric mean HI titers, ≤ 1:95). In challenge studies, chickens immunized with any of the H5 avian influenza vaccines were protected against A/chicken/West Java/SMI-HAMD/2006 (SMI-HAMD/06) and were partially protected against A/chicken/Papua/TA5/2006 (Papua/06) but were not protected against A/chicken/West Java/PWT-WIJ/2006 (PWT/06). Experimental inactivated vaccines made with PWT/06 HPAI virus or rg-generated PWT/06 low-pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) virus seed strains protected chickens from lethal challenge, as did a combination of a commercially available live fowl poxvirus vaccine expressing the H5 influenza virus gene and inactivated Legok/03 vaccine. These studies indicate that antigenic variants did emerge in Indonesia following widespread H5 avian influenza vaccine usage, and efficacious inactivated vaccines can be developed using antigenic variant wild-type viruses or rg-generated LPAI virus seed strains containing the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes of wild-type viruses. IMPORTANCE: H5N1 high-pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) virus has become endemic in Indonesian poultry, and such poultry are the source of virus for birds and mammals, including humans. Vaccination has become a part of the poultry control strategy, but vaccine failures have occurred in the field. This study identified possible causes of vaccine failure, which included the use of an unlicensed virus seed strain and induction of low levels of protective antibody because of an insufficient quantity of vaccine antigen. However, the most important cause of vaccine failure was the appearance of drift variant field viruses that partially or completely overcame commercial vaccine-induced immunity. Furthermore, experimental vaccines using inactivated wild-type virus or reverse genetics-generated vaccines containing the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes of wild-type drift variant field viruses were protective. These studies indicate the need for surveillance to identify drift variant viruses in the field and update licensed vaccines when such variants appear.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25609805      PMCID: PMC4403412          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00025-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  65 in total

1.  Inactivated North American and European H5N2 avian influenza virus vaccines protect chickens from Asian H5N1 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus.

Authors:  David E Swayne; Chang-Won Lee; Erica Spackman
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.378

2.  Humoral antibody responses to different H5N1 and H5N2 vaccination regimes: implications for the development of autogenously based vaccines.

Authors:  Salama A S Shany; Magdy F El-Kady; Bahaa T M Eid; Eman R Hassan; Ahmed S Abdel-Moneim
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  New approach to delist highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses from BSL3+ Select Agents to BSL2 non-select status for diagnostics and vaccines.

Authors:  Samadhan J Jadhao; David L Suarez
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.577

4.  Cross reactive cellular immune responses in chickens previously exposed to low pathogenic avian influenza.

Authors:  Darrell R Kapczynski; Karen Liljebjelke; Gururaj Kulkarni; Henry Hunt; Hai Jun Jiang; Daniel Petkov
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2011-06-03

5.  Evolution and adaptation of H5N1 influenza virus in avian and human hosts in Indonesia and Vietnam.

Authors:  G J D Smith; T S P Naipospos; T D Nguyen; M D de Jong; D Vijaykrishna; T B Usman; S S Hassan; T V Nguyen; T V Dao; N A Bui; Y H C Leung; C L Cheung; J M Rayner; J X Zhang; L J Zhang; L L M Poon; K S Li; V C Nguyen; T T Hien; J Farrar; R G Webster; H Chen; J S M Peiris; Y Guan
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  Structure of antigenic sites on the haemagglutinin molecule of H5 avian influenza virus and phenotypic variation of escape mutants.

Authors:  Nikolai V Kaverin; Irina A Rudneva; Natalia A Ilyushina; Natalia L Varich; Aleksandr S Lipatov; Yuri A Smirnov; Elena A Govorkova; Asya K Gitelman; Dmitri K Lvov; Robert G Webster
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.891

7.  Removal of real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) inhibitors associated with cloacal swab samples and tissues for improved diagnosis of Avian influenza virus by RT-PCR.

Authors:  Amaresh Das; Erica Spackman; Mary J Pantin-Jackwood; David L Suarez
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.279

8.  Efficacy of a commercial inactivated H5 influenza vaccine against highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 in waterfowl evaluated under field conditions.

Authors:  M Rudolf; M Pöppel; A Fröhlich; T Mettenleiter; M Beer; T Harder
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.181

9.  Vaccination of chickens against H5N1 avian influenza in the face of an outbreak interrupts virus transmission.

Authors:  Trevor M Ellis; Connie Y H C Leung; Mary K W Chow; Lucy A Bissett; William Wong; Yi Guan; J S Malik Peiris
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.378

Review 10.  Influenza virus hemagglutinin stalk-based antibodies and vaccines.

Authors:  Florian Krammer; Peter Palese
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 7.090

View more
  16 in total

1.  Role of vaccination-induced immunity and antigenic distance in the transmission dynamics of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1.

Authors:  Ioannis Sitaras; Xanthoula Rousou; Donata Kalthoff; Martin Beer; Ben Peeters; Mart C M de Jong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  The evolution of seasonal influenza viruses.

Authors:  Velislava N Petrova; Colin A Russell
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Avian influenza H5N1 vaccination efficacy in Egyptian backyard poultry.

Authors:  Ahmed Kandeil; Ahmed Mostafa; Rabeh El-Shesheny; Ahmed Nageh El-Taweel; Mokhtar Gomaa; Hussein Galal; Ghazi Kayali; Mohamed A Ali
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Is seasonal vaccination a contributing factor to the selection of influenza epidemic variants?

Authors:  Yong Chong; Hideyuki Ikematsu
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Field effectiveness of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 vaccination in commercial layers in Indonesia.

Authors:  Simson Tarigan; Michael Haryadi Wibowo; Risa Indriani; Sumarningsih Sumarningsih; Sidna Artanto; Syafrison Idris; Peter A Durr; Widya Asmara; Esmaeil Ebrahimie; Mark A Stevenson; Jagoda Ignjatovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Attenuation of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses in Indonesia following the reassortment and acquisition of genes from low pathogenicity avian influenza A virus progenitors.

Authors:  Ni Luh Putu Indi Dharmayanti; Sharmi W Thor; Natosha Zanders; Risza Hartawan; Atik Ratnawati; Yunho Jang; Marisela Rodriguez; David L Suarez; Gina Samaan; C Todd Davis
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 7.163

Review 7.  Evolution, global spread, and pathogenicity of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5Nx clade 2.3.4.4.

Authors:  Dong-Hun Lee; Kateri Bertran; Jung-Hoon Kwon; David E Swayne
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 1.672

8.  Antibody responses to avian influenza viruses in wild birds broaden with age.

Authors:  Sarah C Hill; Ruth J Manvell; Bodo Schulenburg; Wendy Shell; Paul S Wikramaratna; Christopher Perrins; Ben C Sheldon; Ian H Brown; Oliver G Pybus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.530

9.  Genetic and antigenic characterization of influenza A/H5N1 viruses isolated from patients in Indonesia, 2008-2015.

Authors:  Hana A Pawestri; Arie A Nugraha; Alvin X Han; Eka Pratiwi; Edyth Parker; Mathilde Richard; Stefan van der Vliet; Ron A M Fouchier; David H Muljono; Menno D de Jong; Vivi Setiawaty; Dirk Eggink
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.332

10.  Comparison of Chicken Immune Responses after Inoculation with H5 Avian Influenza Virus-like Particles Produced by Insect Cells or Pupae.

Authors:  Dean Huang; Yu-Chan Chao; Zhengbing Lv; Jia-Tsrong Jan; Yu-Chih Yang; Pei-Wen Hsiao; Chia-Ying Wu; Chiu-Hsun Liao; Tzu-Hsien Wu; Lih-Chiann Wang
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.744

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.