Literature DB >> 25609713

The same, only different - DNA damage checkpoints and their reversal throughout the cell cycle.

Indra A Shaltiel1, Lenno Krenning1, Wytse Bruinsma1, René H Medema2.   

Abstract

Cell cycle checkpoints activated by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are essential for the maintenance of the genomic integrity of proliferating cells. Following DNA damage, cells must detect the break and either transiently block cell cycle progression, to allow time for repair, or exit the cell cycle. Reversal of a DNA-damage-induced checkpoint not only requires the repair of these lesions, but a cell must also prevent permanent exit from the cell cycle and actively terminate checkpoint signalling to allow cell cycle progression to resume. It is becoming increasingly clear that despite the shared mechanisms of DNA damage detection throughout the cell cycle, the checkpoint and its reversal are precisely tuned to each cell cycle phase. Furthermore, recent findings challenge the dogmatic view that complete repair is a precondition for cell cycle resumption. In this Commentary, we highlight cell-cycle-dependent differences in checkpoint signalling and recovery after a DNA DSB, and summarise the molecular mechanisms that underlie the reversal of DNA damage checkpoints, before discussing when and how cell fate decisions after a DSB are made.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Keywords:  Adaptation; Competence; DNA damage checkpoints; Plk1; Recovery; Wip1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25609713     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.163766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  132 in total

1.  Transcriptome meta-analysis reveals dysregulated pathways in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Warut Tulalamba; Noppadol Larbcharoensub; Ekaphop Sirachainan; Aunchalee Tantiwetrueangdet; Tavan Janvilisri
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-02-28

Review 2.  DNA Repair in Drosophila: Mutagens, Models, and Missing Genes.

Authors:  Jeff Sekelsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Molecular Mechanisms of Arsenic-Induced Disruption of DNA Repair.

Authors:  Lok Ming Tam; Nathan E Price; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  The nuclear envelope: LINCing tissue mechanics to genome regulation in cardiac and skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Rachel Piccus; Daniel Brayson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Endogenous Replication Stress in Mother Cells Leads to Quiescence of Daughter Cells.

Authors:  Mansi Arora; Justin Moser; Harsha Phadke; Ashik Akbar Basha; Sabrina L Spencer
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  The DNA repair helicase RECQ1 has a checkpoint-dependent role in mediating DNA damage responses induced by gemcitabine.

Authors:  Swetha Parvathaneni; Sudha Sharma
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  MicroRNAomic Transcriptomic Analysis Reveal Deregulation of Clustered Cellular Functions in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells During in Vitro Passaging.

Authors:  Shuh-Wen Aung; Noor Hayaty Abu Kasim; Shamsul Azlin Ahmad Shamsuddin; Thamil Selvee Ramasamy
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.739

8.  Chromatin regulators and their impact on DNA repair and G2 checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Veronique A J Smits; Ignacio Alonso-de Vega; Daniël O Warmerdam
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Genome-wide Map of R-Loop-Induced Damage Reveals How a Subset of R-Loops Contributes to Genomic Instability.

Authors:  Lorenzo Costantino; Douglas Koshland
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Reduced kinase activity of polo kinase Cdc5 affects chromosome stability and DNA damage response in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Chetan C Rawal; Sara Riccardo; Chiara Pesenti; Matteo Ferrari; Federica Marini; Achille Pellicioli
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.